Conroe floods 2007

Quote:
This must have been some mistake. It doesn't even look right. The updated # shouldn't be at a slower clock. Although It would be nice to have an E6650 at 2.40GHz with a 1333fsb.

Quote:
Only when overclocked.....by 300mhz.

But even so, all of these additions should fit in nicely. In about a year when I build a new rig, maybe quad cores will become more affordable

Quote:
When you clock that guy up, I think for that price it will cut it and I bet you that it takes out the FX-62.

Let's see.

9 X multi and 1.8GHz stock at 200MHz FSB (800MHz Quad Pumped)
9 X multi and 3.6GHz at 400MHz FSB (1600MHz Quad Pumped)
9 X multi and 3.83GHz at 425Mhz FSB (1700MHz Quad Pumped)

You don't think that will take out the FX-62? With the lower fsb one can have a higher GHz with less thermal output. I can see a very likely possibility of 3.8 on good air. It will, in my opinion, tromp the FX-62 all around the block and back and for how much?

Care to wager?

Quote:
425 mhz fsb isn,t that too much for that chip , I mean at 400 mhz that would be 100% overclock which would be amazing if it happens but I don,t think it,s possible to go higher than that ( at least not on air )

Quote:
The Asus P5B Deluxe can hit 500MHz+ FSB.

Quote:
I know the mobo can do that , i meant the cpu 400 would be 100% overclock for the cpu so more than that would be diffecult

Quote:
425MHz X 4 (Quad Pumped) = 1700MHz FSB

Quote:
The architecture of the 800MHz FSB Allendales are the same as the core of the Conroes. The FSB has been "Dummied Down" to 800 from 1066. My opinion is that they very likely will have the same basic headroom as the Conroe. Time will bear this out or not.

Quote:
I already knew what 425 meant , just confused about it being soo high
I hope you r right about the headroom , it would be 1 of the best overclockers ever

Quote:
I agree and I hope I am right also. It stands to reason that the silicon fab process maturation of the Conroe will follow to the Allendale. This is more to deal with creating a chip so that disabling of the cache is not necessary. Previously all Allendales (misnomer, I know) were cache disabled Conroe CPU's and yes, some might have been errored cache but considering the volume of sales with Allendale it leads to the extension that as the maturation process moves along there will be less disable of cache due to cache errors than disable of healthy cache to keep up with volume sales.

The cores of both will be the same. The upcoming Allendale (True Allendale) will have 2MB of shared cache with NO disable. The Core2 is fully matured considering that 65nm was fully matured before the creation of Core2. Now we just wait to see

This is also to gain a strangle-hold in the low end market. We enthusiasts are only a few percent of that marketplace.

Quote:
We shall see Nasgul. Keep in mind that the E6300 is stock at 1066MHz FSB and the 4300 will be stock at 800MHz FSB. This is a major difference and with a higher multiplier and lower FSB there could well be higher overclocks on the 4300 than the 6300 considering Core Frequencies.

The FSB is a major hurdle in getting the E6300 pastd 3.4Ghz or so and this will not be the case in the 4300 certainly.

Time will tell though, won't it? I bet it clocks very well on air. Certainly I believe it will clock higher (Pure Core MHz) than the E6300.

Regarding the FSB of 400Mhz. I believe that this will be no issue whatsoever and I am willing to bet good money on this. On high end air I think that this will be obtainable. So if you want to put a few dollars on this, PM me and we can discuss details over the phone my friend

Both Core2 cpu's I have need less than 1.4V to make the 400Mhz fsb. I think that most Allendales can take 400MHz with low core voltage and remember that the Allendale is a 2MB part not the higher multiplied 4MB Conroe.

R