Overclock.net banner

1 - 10 of 10 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
6,776 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Source: <a href="http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4589" target="_blank">http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4589</a><br />
<br />
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="99%">
<tr>
<td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset">

Intel’s latest roadmap outlines plans for Conroe’s 2007 refresh. The upcoming refresh of Intel’s Core 2 Duo processor will arrive at the same time as the upcoming Bearlake 3 series of chipsets. This will be the first time Intel has refreshed its recently released Conroe architecture. The refresh is quite minor this time around. Nevertheless the Conroe refresh raises the front-side bus up to 1333 MHz and adds Intel Trusted Execution Technology.<br />
<br />
Intel Conroe Refresh Processor<br />
<b><br />
E6850 3 GHz 1333 MHz 4MB</b><br />
E6800 2.93 GHz 1066 MHz 4MB<br />
E6750 2.66 GHz 1333 MHz 4MB<br />
E6650 2.33 GHz 1333 MHz 4MB<br />
<br />
Three refreshed models will debut with the upcoming Bearlake 3 series chipsets. These models include the Core 2 Duo E6850, E6750 and E6650 clocked at 3 GHz, 2.66 GHz and 2.33 MHz respectively. At this point in time it doesn’t appear Intel has any plans for its Core 2 Extreme lineup, in terms of dual-core processors that is. Kentsfield Core 2 Extreme QX6700 will remain as Intel’s flag-ship enthusiast product.<br />
<br />
In addition to the refreshed Conroe Core 2 Duo lineup, Intel will release one more 1066 MHz front-side bus endowed Core 2 Duo product. The upcoming Core 2 Duo E6800 will arrive clocked at 2.93 GHz—similar to Intel’s Core 2 Extreme X6800. The processor is expected to be Intel’s flagship processor for mainstream segments. Aside from the locked multiplier, the Core 2 Duo E6800 is identical to the Core 2 Extreme X6800.

</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>Hey! I got me an E6850 <img src="/images/smilies/yessir.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Yessir" class="inlineimg" /><br />
My E6600 is doing 334x9fsb for a 3.0ghz on a 1333 fsb.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
17,110 Posts
So no x6900? =/
 

·
Starting to become a BOFH
Joined
·
10,471 Posts
Hehe... price drops on currnet C2Ds... Nice find Nas.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
5,844 Posts
This means that more boards are gonna release BIOS's with the 1333 strap <img alt="" class="inlineimg" src="/images/smilies/biggrin.gif" style="border:0px solid;" title="Big Grin">
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,996 Posts
OMG INTEL STOP IT! i can't decide what to get! first the xeon chips, then this?
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
4,543 Posts
I'm just getting an E6300 and I'm going to save for a quad core when I can get one for a good deal.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
7,245 Posts
I read somewhere those chips come in Q3 2007, not right now. Look at that:<br />
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="99%">
<tr>
<td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset">

<div>
Originally Posted by <strong>www.matbe.com</strong>

</div>
<div style="font-style:italic">Les processeurs E6650, E6750 et E6850 cadencés respectivement à 2.33, 2.66 et 3.0 GHz devrait voir le jour au troisième trimestre 2007.</div>

</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>Translation: The CPUs E6650, E6750 and E6850 at a frequency of 2.33, 2.66 and 3.0 GHz will see the light of day in the 3rd trimester of 2007.<br />
<br />
Link tor the whole artice <a href="http://www.matbe.com/actualites/14592/intel-core-2-duo-1333/" target="_blank">here</a>, can be translated with google.<br />
It seems to me there's still a while 'till we'll see any 1333FSB C2D and it also seems this launch is somehow connected with the launch of faster CPUs build with AMD's 65nm technology.<br />
<br />
*EDIT Forgot the link <img src="/images/smilies/tongue.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Stick Out Tongue" class="inlineimg" />
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,996 Posts
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="99%">
<tr>
<td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset">

<div>
Originally Posted by <strong>dragosmp</strong>

</div>
<div style="font-style:italic">I read somewhere those chips come in Q3 2007, not right now. Look at that:<br />
<br />
Translation: The CPUs E6650, E6750 and E6850 at a frequency of 2.33, 2.66 and 3.0 GHz will see the light of day in the 3rd trimester of 2007.<br />
<br />
Link tor the whole artice <a href="http://www.matbe.com/actualites/14592/intel-core-2-duo-1333/" target="_blank">here</a>, can be translated with google.<br />
It seems to me there's still a while 'till we'll see any 1333FSB C2D and it also seems this launch is somehow connected with the launch of faster CPUs build with AMD's 65nm technology.<br />
<br />
*EDIT Forgot the link <img src="/images/smilies/tongue.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Stick Out Tongue" class="inlineimg" /></div>

</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>*sigh* i guess i'll stick with buying a 6400 during chirstmas time and sell that off when those chips come out.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
6,776 Posts
Discussion Starter #10
Because it has a 1333fsb as opposed to 1066fsb. <br />
<br />
So 333x7 = 2.33ghz <br />
&<br />
266x9 = 2.39ghz<br />
<br />
Basically the difference is 60mhz decrease in clock speed but 266fsb increase which in some cases (not overclocking) the E6650 will be a better choice if price were to be the exact same but.......I'd still recommend the E6600 because of the higher ratio......and I'm at E6850 speeds.
 
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Top