Overclock.net banner
1 - 7 of 84 Posts

· Banned
Joined
·
11,947 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Just when you thought the EA/Maxis SimCity saga couldn't get any crazier ...

EA Disabling User Accounts Because It Thinks Any Contact With Amazon Must Be A Refund Request
Quote:
Jeff says he was finally able to use the relay to talk to EA, and found out that indeed, he'd been banned from the game because Amazon had instituted a chargeback. Except, it didn't, because he never asked for a refund or chargeback of any kind. He adds that Amazon was nice enough to give him a $40 credit for the problems it hadn't caused, while EA simply gave him a 15% discount off his next Origin purchase and blamed Amazon for his troubles.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
11,947 Posts
Discussion Starter · #13 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by b.walker36 View Post

The article said amazon said that EA is aware and re-enabling peoples accounts. It is possible that EA requested from amazon anyone who was given money back due to the game and perhaps their systems were disabling accounts incorrectly. If EA is re-enabling accounts its just a mistake and not the end of the world. But if these people are actually getting refunds from amazon then their accounts should be disabled.

You cannot expect to keep the game after getting a refund.
Yes, but as the article said ...
Quote:
... because he never asked for a refund or chargeback of any kind.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
11,947 Posts
Discussion Starter · #64 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmasteR View Post

Yet majority of you will still buy EA Published video games even after all these issues.
rolleyes.gif


"Oh, but its Crysis 3!"

"Oh, but its BattleField 4!"

"Oh, but its insert AAA title published by EA"
Not me. I don't own a single title made by EA in the past 10 years.

[Edit]

Strike that, 11 years. The last EA game I bought was in 2002. Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit 2. After that, I didn't like Underground or the rest of the NFS games, so I stopped bothering with them.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
11,947 Posts
Discussion Starter · #72 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by -Apocalypse- View Post

By the time this was a news article EA was already fixing it. It was just an automated program getting triggered improperly. Perhaps QA could have caught it, however this is one company relying on another's systems when neither has access to the other. Cross company QA is nearly unheard of because of the cost.
Then maybe they shouldn't be banning people automatically if their QA system can't test it.
rolleyes.gif
 

· Banned
Joined
·
11,947 Posts
Discussion Starter · #76 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by -Apocalypse- View Post

It was almost assuredly tested. The problem is they didn't know that there was multiple conditions that send the same query from Amazon. Lack of communication between the companies was far more the problem than QA.
Like I said, then maybe they shouldn't AUTOMATICALLY ban people then. If you aren't going to communicate with one of your major distributors, then don't do it. That is the very definition of poor QA.
 
1 - 7 of 84 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top