Overclock.net banner

1 - 12 of 12 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
46 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Hi Guys<br><br>
I got the 805D chip @ 3.6 and it's pretty good for games, I was wondering what's the better chip out of these 2 for games and apps?<br><br>
Intel Core 2 E6300 these chips can go to 3GHZ $280AU to buy<br>
Pentium D 945 3.40Ghz I heard these chips can get pass 4GHZ $250 AU<br><br>
I just want something to max my MSI X1900XT out.<br><br>
Cheers
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
24,372 Posts
E6300 by far. No competition from the D945. You'll need way over 5GHz on a D9xx CPU to match an E6300 at 3.0 GHz. Also, the E6300 can hit over 3.0 easily (I've seen 3.5GHz on air)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
46 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="99%">
<tr>
<td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset">

<div>
Originally Posted by <strong>Chozart</strong>

</div>
<div style="font-style:italic">E6300 by far. No competition from the D945. You'll need way over 5GHz on a D9xx CPU to match an E6300 at 3.0 GHz. Also, the E6300 can hit over 3.0 easily (I've seen 3.5GHz on air)</div>

</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>Thanks for that looks like I might have to go with a E6300.<br />
<br />
Mainly into gaming and using a program called MAME <br />
<a href="http://www.mame.net" target="_blank">www.mame.net</a> this program is very CPU hungry.<br />
<br />
Does anyone know if a 945 @ 4.0GHZ would be a lot faster in mame then a E6300 @ 3.0GHZ?
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
24,372 Posts
Trust me. The E6300 at 3.0 GHz would beat the D945 at 4.0 GHz in any application you can imagine. The architecture is just so superior.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
6,776 Posts
Personally, I think it's a bad idea to put an E6300 on that 945P chipet mobo. <br />
Even though it'll work, I'm not sure if I've ever seen a 945P chipset as high as 300fsb.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
24,372 Posts
It'll still run better than the D945
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
4,976 Posts
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="99%">
<tr>
<td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset">

<div>
Originally Posted by <strong>Nasgul</strong>

</div>
<div style="font-style:italic">Personally, I think it's a bad idea to put an E6300 on that 945P chipet mobo. <br />
Even though it'll work, I'm not sure if I've ever seen a 945P chipset as high as 300fsb.</div>

</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>I agree nasgul.<br />
<br />
If you want to get an E6300 (which would be a VERY good idea). I suggest you trade/sell your board and get a Gigabyte S3 motherboard. And you'll be good to go.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
46 Posts
Discussion Starter #8
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="99%">
<tr>
<td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset">

<div>
Originally Posted by <strong>lightsource</strong>

</div>
<div style="font-style:italic">I agree nasgul.<br />
<br />
If you want to get an E6300 (which would be a VERY good idea). I suggest you trade/sell your board and get a Gigabyte S3 motherboard. And you'll be good to go.</div>

</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>Hi<br />
<br />
Yeah I was thinking of getting a Gigabyte 965 S3 board, cause I heard these can go as high as 450 FSB.<br />
<br />
I think the one I have atm the 945P S3 only goes to 360FSB.<br />
<br />
If I set a divider on my memory I should be able to get 3GHZ with a 965 S3 board.<br />
<br />
If the super PI test's are quicker with the E6300 then a 945 then MAME will run great.<br />
<br />
Cheers<br />
<br />
Josh
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
6,776 Posts
945P as high as 360fsb? I've never seen it that high, come to think of, I think I've seen the 945P only one single time doing upto 300fsb but that's it, only ONE single time. And yes it was stable from what I saw and it was in this forum but who's rig was it? I can't remember.<br />
<br />
IMO, your best bet will be the GIGABYTE P965 S3.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
16,364 Posts
Look on Anandtec for some good SiSandra scores on c2 chips. Their Integer and floating point calulations are far above any other cpu before them. In retrospect look at my cpu scores for a comparison of the c2's ability to 'feed' a GPU.<br />
<br />
PD805 @ 3.2ghz-> Integer 8x iSSE4= 38,755<br />
Floating-point x4 iSSE2= 32,354<br />
<br />
E6700 @ 2.75ghz-> Integer 8x iSSE4= 150,366<br />
Floating-point x4 iSSE2= 81,491<br />
<br />
E6700 @ 3.4ghz-> Integer 8x iSSE4= 186,614<br />
Floating-point x4 iSSE2= 100,767<br />
<br />
Here you can see, as far as graphical calculations go...C2D's are roughly 2-3x as 'potent' as the previous gen Dual Cores. These scores even stomp the 955XE into the ground, as 'they' typically tested in the high 40's- low 50 thousands.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,102 Posts
Right now I'm running Orthos on both cores @ 3.01GHz... on stock cooling. Hontestly, I don't know how much the D945 would bottleneck your GFX card, but if you're considering this purchase as a long term investment, I strongly suggest the E6300.<br />
<br />
Another option: Get an E6600... and skip the motherboard for now.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
24,372 Posts
I don't think the E6600 is worth the extra money. I'd settle for the E6400, which is only $40 over the E6300 and has the advantage of the higher multi. The E6600 is a bigger jump in price, however, and not worth it (I would not have gotten it again)
 
1 - 12 of 12 Posts
Top