[HappycoreDJ]

Dude! I get like -150ping and like 10,000FPS!

CRY MORE!

 

[Twistacles]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lxcivic2k1 Alright so last week I told I guy he lagged (he teleported a bit due to the server most likely) and this is what he said. "I don't lag man, it's you. I'm playing at 450fps on a 55" TV" All I had to say was "Um, no your not, CS has a max of 300fps" along with 4 other people saying the same thing. He shut up after that, lol.

No, you go in console fps_max 1000(or more)

Now who's the idiot?

And besides, with a config its easy to hit numbers over a thousand on small maps

 

[Ecchi-BANZAII!!!]

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyHeaven This is what annoys me. "What, your only getting 80 fps? I'm getting over 200 fps so imagine how much better my game looks than yours." This is the reason why I haven't upgraded my gpu. It's not a difference we are going to see without using our imagination .

How can he say that since he will have so much worse case of screen tearing than yours...

 

[goobergump]

Whatever guys, I run a liquid nitrogen pc 23/7. that one hour is me bragging to the internet about my e-peen. I also get 50,000+fps because chuck norris said I could. I even have a self refrigerating mouse to cool my hands from kicking so much E-butt. My awesome ping is like negative 400, which means something I don't know what it means...

Probably means I need to stop doing drugs

 

[Lxcivic2k1]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Twistacles No, you go in console fps_max 1000(or more) Now who's the idiot? And besides, with a config its easy to hit numbers over a thousand on small maps

lol, anyone who puts in that command for actually playing.

Also these situations are on large maps in pub servers where most are getting 30fps. Don't try and be a smartass, it's not needed. This isn't about how people can exploit things to say they've hit that high it's about morons making up random **** about their computer.

 

[Domino]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Royaltramp ...And the lag has nothing to do with frames per seconds, it's all your latency. So no matter what values they said I would have laughed xD -Matt

What if your PC was so slow, that your CPU could not handle the code for networking and thus process the information slower. In turn, this can be seen as a low FPS amount and thus it can have a relation. A faster PC can help with networking, but how significant? I dunno, playing RA2 back in the day on a P2 and comparing that to an P4 build, the ping was lower on the P4 compared to the P2.

 

[eureka]

What kind of idiot allows their FPS to hit 1k?

I don't want fluctuations in FPS - I want a constant 100.

 

[Ecchi-BANZAII!!!]

Quote:

Originally Posted by eureka What kind of idiot allows their FPS to hit 1k? I don't want fluctuations in FPS - I want a constant 100.

I want constant 1:1 (FPS:Hz)(No tearing)

 

[Bonz(TM)]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ecchi-BANZAII!!! I want constant 1:1 (FPS:Hz)(No tearing)

+1

No sense (IMHO) to go over what your screen can show.

FPS:Hz makes the game look so much cleaner.

 

[TheSandman]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eski Cap mine at 150.. was scary moving form 70fps on the 4670 up to a 4870 and hitting the 200fps!! I'm sure thats normal for most of your guys, I I've sent years playing around 40fps until 2009 came along! whats the average amount of pinging people are used too? 15ms for me in the UK

dude your FPS was low on the 4670, on a 7600GT @ 12x10 I was doing around 110, 8800GS was breaking 180, and my 3870 was doing about 170FPS. Something else is wrong. My 4830 CF is pushing past 300, im just to lazy to change maxFPS

 

[DEC_42]

Or you can just set vSync on...

 

[pez]

Quote:

Originally Posted by AntiTalent at my folks house, half Mb BT Line with horrific attenuation, ~60-70ms previously had 8Mb to myself in London, usually about 10-20ms. Loved it. Though that was more to do with the raw downloading speed. Is CSS one of those games where ridiculous FPS is beneficial though (ala COD4?)

I don't think anyone's answered your question, but I don't think it's helpful like in CoD4 for any types of jumps or anything. IMO though, CSS is unplayable below ~50 FPS. 40 and below is def. unplayable to me. Sad thing is, Vista + a 2.5ghz dual core 939 amd CPU = minimum fps's of about 30, even with my card. Hopefully this Kuma can clock and not be fussy at about 3Ghz so that my minimum FPS won't be so low anymore

.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HappycoreDJ I like how you posted a screenshot of yourself looking at a dark wall. Who doesn't get high fps with anything dark? Go into a full server with a lot of action going on and post a screenshot. LOL

It was to merely say that you can get over 300 fps. Troll much?

 

[AntiTalent]

Quote:

Originally Posted by pez I don't think anyone's answered your question, but I don't think it's helpful like in CoD4 for any types of jumps or anything. IMO though, CSS is unplayable below ~50 FPS. 40 and below is def. unplayable to me. Sad thing is, Vista + a 2.5ghz dual core 939 amd CPU = minimum fps's of about 30, even with my card. Hopefully this Kuma can clock and not be fussy at about 3Ghz so that my minimum FPS won't be so low anymore .

If that's the case then having 400fps vs 60 doesn't really make any difference.

That's odd about your system's minfps - I'm anywhere between 40-130fps (though I don't do AA, HDR or fancy reflections). I'm always aware when I've got powersaving mode on though, since my CPU gets throttled to 1GHz, and I get ~18fps on CSS, about 8 on TF2.

As is widely known the source engine is really CPU reliant. So I think the Kuma will see you well. My X2 is a 2.6, but if I ratchet it up to 2.8 I find it does help with the occasional slowdown (software OCing Dell MBs ftw)

 

[pez]

Quote:

Originally Posted by AntiTalent If that's the case then having 400fps vs 60 doesn't really make any difference. That's odd about your system's minfps - I'm anywhere between 40-130fps (though I don't do AA, HDR or fancy reflections). I'm always aware when I've got powersaving mode on though, since my CPU gets throttled to 1GHz, and I get ~18fps on CSS, about 8 on TF2. As is widely known the source engine is really CPU reliant. So I think the Kuma will see you well. My X2 is a 2.6, but if I ratchet it up to 2.8 I find it does help with the occasional slowdown (software OCing Dell MBs ftw)

Yeah, I had a couple other members on her help me out with determining the problem. And we came to the conclusion with socket 939 dual core and Vista, clock speed is king. 40 FPS to me is still just laggy.

 

[DeadSkull]

Downloading cs:s right now. I want to see the fps I get with my Q9650 at 4.3 and an 8800 Ultra. I remember back on my x2 3800+ @ 2.95 I used to get maybe 80 avg fps?

 

[xJumper]

lol I have heard crazy **** on CSS, like one guy (obviously hacking) trying to convince me that he had a quad-monitor HD 1080p setup and that's how he could see me and pull 360 headshots.

 

[br3nd064]

I haven't read this whole thread, but to the OP - you can set the frame rate max to whatever you want (fps_max #).

My favorite CSS moment was probably when some kid was telling me about getting 800fps on his 9400gt...

 

[Antolen]

i like when people play at lowest setting to get that 400-500 fps lol i would rather get ~150 max out than 400 on low..

 

[Afrodisiac]

I like when kids on CSS talk about their "beast" AMD x2 3800 8600GT rigs.

 

[MarineRevenge]

Quote:

Originally Posted by DEC_42 Or you can just set vSync on...

You've never played a source engine game with Vsync enabled i guess.

Source + vsynce = massive mouse lag. Like, 1-2 second delays bad.