I agree that his is extremely opinionated, but he also seems to be right more than wrong. I think it is more a reflection of the OCN members on how they filter his BS as oposed to it being posted or not. I would rather see them get rid of some of the other "news".
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
Quote:
+1
This and people can make up their own minds on things.
Originally Posted by dralb  I agree that his is extremely opinionated, but he also seems to be right more than wrong. I think it is more a reflection of the OCN members on how they filter his BS as oposed to it being posted or not. I would rather see them get rid of some of the other "news". |
This and people can make up their own minds on things.
I've got no problem with his articles being posted, but only under the following condition:
His article be backed with a second, reputable source saying the same thing.
Should take care of the problem at hand while still allowing any truth he speaks to come through.
Quote:
'
A pinch? Try a pound
![]()
His article be backed with a second, reputable source saying the same thing.
Should take care of the problem at hand while still allowing any truth he speaks to come through.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkmachine I do enjoy reading the INQ, even if you have to take it with a pinch of salt. |
A pinch? Try a pound
2
Quote:
Quote:
Indeed thats possible, but it doesnt exactly lessen the amount of posts/flaming that goes on. Dont get me wrong, I dont like charlie, but there is only so many times I can see a single person getting flamed, even if its his own fault.
Quote:
Indeed, but if I speculate as much as that place does, I am bound to randomly hit the target too ocasionally.
Quote:
This is a very good idea.
EDIT
http://www.overclock.net/hardware-ne...ia-losing.html
http://www.overclock.net/hardware-ne...backlog-2.html
These two articles kinda sorta display what I am talking about. After reading both, its clear Charlie has no clue what hes talking about, so we all sit around flaming him all day long.
Originally Posted by DuckieHo Why not just delete the OT posts in those threads instead? |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penicilyn This and people can make up their own minds on things. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by 0rion I have no problem with it. When I see the INQ Tags before the article, I realize its from the inquirer and probably has a lot of exaggeration in it. I dont see why people have such a problem with it. The inquirer might put out a lot of crap, but more times than not, they are right, and a lot of the times you hear about things from them first. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by TestECull I've got no problem with his articles being posted, but only under the following condition: His article be backed with a second, reputable source saying the same thing. Should take care of the problem at hand while still allowing any truth he speaks to come through. |
EDIT
http://www.overclock.net/hardware-ne...ia-losing.html
http://www.overclock.net/hardware-ne...backlog-2.html
These two articles kinda sorta display what I am talking about. After reading both, its clear Charlie has no clue what hes talking about, so we all sit around flaming him all day long.
4
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
