[Nautilus]

I did not post quote from the source because it is in Turkish and Google translate is a joke but the picture above tells a lot. Also the title is original, not made up by me.

PS: AMD is allegedly pushing back the release date to October of the FX series. According to DH.

Source

 

[Devilmaypoop]

You'd think they'd clock the Quad and Hex cores higher..

 

[Atomfix]

Donaimhaber again? I wish Lulzsec where still around to vanish them forever

 

[Lampen]

Meh nothing new.

 

[eggs2see]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atomfix;14210787
Donaimhaber again? I wish Lulzsec where still around to vanish them forever

Be careful what you wish for.

 

[Mit Namso]

3.8 turbo from 3.6 on FX4100

thats pointless

probably not very much OC headroom left from 3.6

 

[Razi3l]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mit Namso 3.8 turbo from 3.6 on FX4100 thats pointless probably not very much OC headroom left from 3.6

Or maybe so its not faster than the more expensive products?...

 

[tout]

The whole chart doesn't seem very legit. Turbo core ranging from a useless 200 MHz up to 900 MHz depending on the CPU? I would guess within the same series chip the turbo core increase would be uniform instead of this mess.

 

[Fr0sty]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mit Namso 3.8 turbo from 3.6 on FX4100 thats pointless probably not very much OC headroom left from 3.6

how can a x8 turbo higher then a x4 ????

LOL dominhaber bullcrap again

Quote:

Originally Posted by tout The whole chart doesn't seem very legit. Turbo core ranging from a useless 200 MHz up to 900 MHz depending on the CPU? I would guess within the same series chip the turbo core increase would be uniform instead of this mess.

its just another one of those made up totally fake stuff ... amd themselves said the server version has a 500mhz turbo ... so i dont understand those 400mhz turbo or even a tiny 200mhz turbo ....

none of it make sense ....

 

[_GTech]

Everything I need to know is how each of those beast Over-Clock & How they perform on Benches Overclocked!

That's everything to me...

 

[InfernoReaper]

So apparently their flagship CPU, FX-8130, is just gone?

Seems that it was renamed to 8150

 

[Mit Namso]

does the general public computer user follow computer tech releases at all?

the only people I think follow it closely like OCers are

1)company types/schools/offices....... that need lots of PCs
2)computer stores

this is taking forever

 

[Chuckclc]

Yeah all the names changed and the clock speeds dont make since? I give this no credibility.

 

[45nm]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phantom123 HIGHLY doubt it is delayed to October. Maybe some SKU's are delayed like the 4 core FX but I doubt the 8 core and 6 core will be delayed. They already have the box art, and marketing set for the processors (since June). It is most likely misinformation. Mark my words, Bulldozer 6 and 8 core will be out by mid August.

September 3rd according to [H] Kyle Bennett.

 

[Obakemono]

Broken record. Again.

 

[Evil Penguin]

Quote:

Originally Posted by 45nm;14213943
September 3rd according to [H] Kyle Bennett.

I thought he said the 6th?
Anyway.
I highly doubt all of these listed CPUs have an unlocked multiplier like the graph implies.

 

[BlackVenom]

In before lock.

I WANTS BULLDOZER!!

 

[Jotun]

Quote:

Originally Posted by PoopaScoopa;14211082
IB4 lock and moved to rumors.

Not necessarily in that order. What would be the point of locking it and then moving it.

 

[TitaniumClocker]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jotun;14217242
Not necessarily in that order. What would be the point of locking it and then moving it.

How about we just straight away delete it.

 

[blackbalt89]

MORE delays? Jesus.

Just when I thought I was ready to give AMD a shot they decide to wait until LGA 2011 to release their Bulldozers.