Did you like Crysis Warhead more than the original ?
1 - 20 of 27 Posts
Joined
·
14,362 Posts
Quote:
I liked it a lot, but the story felt a little jumbled. I enjoyed the original a lot and there was more replay value for me with the original.
That being said, Warhead is great game and I still enjoy playing it. My favorite part is when you ride the train. I like Wars personally, but others don't like it all that much.
Originally Posted by brian1337  I like it way more than the original Crysis, but then Warhead is too short compared to the original one. |
That being said, Warhead is great game and I still enjoy playing it. My favorite part is when you ride the train. I like Wars personally, but others don't like it all that much.
Joined
·
3,463 Posts
warhead is way too short, and feels like it was slapped together at the last minute.
the original, imo, was much longer and much more immerse gameplay. you actually get a sense of the storyline, which in warhead seems non-existent (just run-n-gun the whole time).
i liked the original better, personally.
the original, imo, was much longer and much more immerse gameplay. you actually get a sense of the storyline, which in warhead seems non-existent (just run-n-gun the whole time).
i liked the original better, personally.
Joined
·
16,927 Posts
Quote:
i can agree here. i was hoping for more open-ended play like crysis but it was too linear. it was fun, and well optimised, but it felt more like CoD 4 than Crysis tbh. Far Cry 2 disappointed me in that aspect as well, as the AI is ridiculous in it, and you can't jump to save your life
the graphics are better in warhead, the game is a lot faster, and the aliens are annoying in a fun and challenging way., get the game: really good.
haven't tried Crysis Wars though.
Originally Posted by IEATFISH I liked it a lot, but the story felt a little jumbled. I enjoyed the original a lot and there was more replay value for me with the original. That being said, Warhead is great game and I still enjoy playing it. My favorite part is when you ride the train. I like Wars personally, but others don't like it all that much. |
the graphics are better in warhead, the game is a lot faster, and the aliens are annoying in a fun and challenging way., get the game: really good.
haven't tried Crysis Wars though.
Joined
·
4,996 Posts
I have not played much of warhead yet!! But I like it so far.. I did like the first one, but thought it was to short..
I do hate EA's 3 install crap they put into warhead. I installed it only twice and it locked me out. I had to contact them to unlock it so I could play. They made it sound like they were doing me a favor by unlocking MY game..
Even if you reformat that counts as a new install.. I sure hope they don't use that crap in anymore of there games...
I do hate EA's 3 install crap they put into warhead. I installed it only twice and it locked me out. I had to contact them to unlock it so I could play. They made it sound like they were doing me a favor by unlocking MY game..
Even if you reformat that counts as a new install.. I sure hope they don't use that crap in anymore of there games...
Joined
·
221 Posts
I liked the original better than Warhead. The gameplay in the original felt much much more open than in Warhead. A lot of things in Warhead seemed over the top, kind of like Rambo. I guess that is what they were going for though. I think both games are very good, but I liked the original better.
i liked warhead, but something was off with the story. in crysis, i didn't like the part with the aliens, so i like warhead because you shoot a lot more KPA. but i thought the stup for firefights in crysis was better.
if i had to choose, i'd choose crysis until the zero-g part (i hate that part)
if i had to choose, i'd choose crysis until the zero-g part (i hate that part)
Joined
·
213 Posts
I'd say the original Crysis is a lot more fun.
Joined
·
7,501 Posts
Fk no. Warhead is a generic attempt at reviving the same story, and ended up being an extremely short and repetitious game because of it.
Joined
·
2,407 Posts
I am one of those who will tell you that Warhead was a complete waste of time.
It is very action packed, lots of gunning and running, and blah blah blah, but there is no substance beneath that action.
Crysis I felt had substance, warhead has none.
It is very action packed, lots of gunning and running, and blah blah blah, but there is no substance beneath that action.
Crysis I felt had substance, warhead has none.
Joined
·
1,230 Posts
I liked Warhead better.
- I didnt find the originals story to be deep in the first place so that didnt bother me with the second.
- They went a little overboard with the vehicle and rail levels. The game was too short for how long these were which leads to the linearity. The on foot sections were not anymore linear than the original.
- I didnt find the originals story to be deep in the first place so that didnt bother me with the second.
- They went a little overboard with the vehicle and rail levels. The game was too short for how long these were which leads to the linearity. The on foot sections were not anymore linear than the original.
Joined
·
2,383 Posts
The first story was like... nothing to me. Thanks, I guess I'll steer clear of this one til a big 'ol price drop in a year.
Joined
·
11,459 Posts
I am playing through Warhead SP right now and the storyline is a bit sub-par but the fact that it looks and runs amazing kinda distracts me from any would-be story line
1 - 20 of 27 Posts
Join the discussion
