Overclock.net banner

which processor?

  • E4300

    Votes: 29 59.2%
  • e6300

    Votes: 20 40.8%

e4300 vs e6300

4403 Views 33 Replies 18 Participants Last post by  luckii
well i need a processor for my new rig, currently in the making. now i want to be some what in touch with technology and have dual core
so do you think i should save some money with the e4300 or go with the e6300. i heard the e4300 are excellent overclockers, while the e6300 are decent when it comes to overclocking.

so what do you think?
See less See more
1 - 20 of 34 Posts
e4300 because it overclocks really well, cheaper price for the performance. Most bang for your buck in my opinion.
And E6320 would be better.......then again, the E6x50 are also coming soon, so, decisions, decisions, decisions.........

I'd say wait for the E6x50s.
4300 FTW, if you're in this forum we make up the cost difference for OCs... watercool with the savings...
Quote:

Originally Posted by H3||scr3am View Post
4300 FTW, if you're in this forum we make up the cost difference for OCs... watercool with the savings...
hmmm wise words. but what does FTW mean....
See less See more
An E6300 SL9SA has the same if not better OCing potential a 4300 has. I would go for an E6300 but make sure its SL9SA and not SL9TA.
drop multi to 8x and same chip. they oc to about the same thing.
Quote:

Originally Posted by luckii View Post
drop multi to 8x and same chip. they oc to about the same thing.
6400 has the 8x multi, 6300 is only a 7x
See less See more
The e6300 I meantioned has Tdiode enabled and also 22w Extended Halt Power instead of 12.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pheoxs View Post
6400 has the 8x multi, 6300 is only a 7x
He is talkign about 4300 which has 9X..
See less See more
hmm seems more people are going for the 4300. ill check up in the morning to see what the scores are. im most interested in best bang for the buck thing. i want to save some money so i can afford oter parts. but if one thing is more expensive and is 100x better then ill spend a little more
Quote:


Originally Posted by badreligion156
View Post

hmm seems more people are going for the 4300. ill check up in the morning to see what the scores are. im most interested in best bang for the buck thing. i want to save some money so i can afford oter parts. but if one thing is more expensive and is 100x better then ill spend a little more

i think the E4300 coses 2/3 of the E600 price.. not sure though >>
See less See more
E6300 is just harder to overclock. The E4300 is a better deal.
Quote:


Originally Posted by Namrac
View Post

E6300 is just harder to overclock. The E4300 is a better deal.

As long as he gets a good heatsink then OCing it will be quite normal. Well anyway just because of the price difference I would go fr the 4300.
See less See more
I am with Nasgul. E6320.

Between the E6300 and the E6320, that's a no-brainer. And I would pick the E6320 over the E4300 any day.

The E4300 doesn't clock as well as you think... a lot of people have trouble with just a little over 3.0GHz.
Stay away from E4xxx iam starting to think they are the PresHOTTs of C2D's, everyones having heat problems with them.
more than pleased with my 6300...

details in spec. could go a lot higher but i'm on intels fan...still a 1GHz overclock though, undervolted too
See less See more
2
Quote:


Originally Posted by technik
View Post

more than pleased with my 6300...

details in spec. could go a lot higher but i'm on intels fan...still a 1GHz overclock though, undervolted too


good chip u picked up there. but i believe that if u raised your fsb in order to hit 3.2 overall clock, that your vcore would have to be raised to possibly 1.4 like my 4300. i never tried overclocking with stock or lower vcore but it seems interesting.
See less See more
2
Quote:


Originally Posted by luckii
View Post

good chip u picked up there. but i believe that if u raised your fsb in order to hit 3.2 overall clock, that your vcore would have to be raised to possibly 1.4 like my 4300. i never tried overclocking with stock or lower vcore but it seems interesting.

temps are ok at 2.8. 40's idle in TAT and goes to low 50's when loaded. seems high, but is fine considering the default heatsink and compound. i'm sure i'd get 3GHz at less than default voltage and be able to run it ok on default heatsink as its currently a bit cooler round here at the moment. in a heatwave i wouldnt be trying it
See less See more
2
Quote:


Originally Posted by badreligion156
View Post

well i need a processor for my new rig, currently in the making. now i want to be some what in touch with technology and have dual core
so do you think i should save some money with the e4300 or go with the e6300. i heard the e4300 are excellent overclockers, while the e6300 are decent when it comes to overclocking.

so what do you think?

Its hard to recommend one over the other, you haven't provided enough background information. Do you have any of the other components for the build already purchased? If so what mobo? If you've picked up a mobo that can easily oc to 450 fsb I would be inclined to suggest the e6300. However if you have bought or are intent on purchasing a mobo that will struggle to break 400 fsb then clearly you would want a chip with a higher multiplier...

Another thing to consider would be that on average the newer production chips don't seem to OC nearly as well or at least as consistently.

IMHO, I would recommend:
1) As Nasgul suggested wait for the e6x50 series chips and/or 7/22 price drops
2) Maybe consider purchasing an e21x0 chip, If it ocs to 3.0ghz+ great if not sell it on ebay after awhile and pick up a new chip after price drops

just my 2 cents.
See less See more
1 - 20 of 34 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top