Overclock.net banner

[Engadget] Gurus develop way to shrink atomic clock... with lasers

1061 Views 14 Replies 12 Participants Last post by  vicious_fishes
Quote:

The world's most accurate clocks got even more accurate just a few years back, but now a team from the University of Nevada in Reno is looking to make the atomic clock way, way smaller. Housed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Boulder, Colorado, these so-called "fountain clocks" send out clouds of caesium atoms through a vacuum chamber in a magnetic field; from there, microwaves in the chamber excite the atoms and then emit light as they drop to a lower hyperfine state. All that rocket science aside, the real point here is that all that magic requires a chassis about the size of a modern day refrigerator. Andrei Derevianko and Kyle Beloy have conjured up the idea of "trapping atoms in place using lasers," which would obviously require far less space for the time telling to happen. Just think -- a chicken in every pot and an atomic clock on every wrist.
Source
See less See more
  • Rep+
Reactions: 1
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
caesium! totally fun at pool parties.
Quote:


Originally Posted by logo199
View Post

caesium! totally fun at pool parties.

And safe too because you can escape the death and destruction through the hole in the Earth you'd create by putting the cesium in the pool.
See less See more
Quote:


Originally Posted by logo199
View Post

caesium! totally fun at pool parties.

Nah Francium is way more fun.
See less See more
What's with all the lasers recently? First it was military, then private contracters to protect against the future AI revolution, then mosquito killers, and now this... which is arguably the coolest of all (not sarcasm, btw--I'm obsessed with timekeeping, lol).
Quote:


Originally Posted by AOwpr
View Post

What's with all the lasers recently? First it was military, then private contracters to protect against the future AI revolution, then mosquito killers, and now this... which is arguably the coolest of all (not sarcasm, btw--I'm obsessed with timekeeping, lol).

Well there much more efficient than wires. Less material being used, so much faster, able to hold more energy, we just have to harness it.
See less See more
That level of accuracy doesn't need to be on your wrist. I can see why you would like them smaller. But really no thank you on the part where you want me to pay up for an atomic wrist watch.
Quote:


Originally Posted by lolhax
View Post

Frickin' lasers!

See less See more
2
Quote:


Originally Posted by logo199
View Post

caesium! totally fun at pool parties.


lol...yeah, as long as it isn't your pool or your friends. The only proper everyday use for caesium is fishing.


As for the shrinking with lasers...old news....Wayne Szalinski did this in the 80's. There was a great documentary about him accidentally shrinking his children and then having to find them in his backyard. Brilliant man, that Szalinski.
See less See more
2
Quote:

Originally Posted by RaBidRaBit View Post
lol...yeah, as long as it isn't your pool or your friends. The only proper everyday use for caesium is fishing.


As for the shrinking with lasers...old news....Wayne Szalinski did this in the 80's. There was a great documentary about him accidentally shrinking his children and then having to find them in his backyard. Brilliant man, that Szalinski.
OMG! that sounds more fun then dynamite fishing!
See less See more
2
Quote:


Originally Posted by RaBidRaBit
View Post

lol...yeah, as long as it isn't your pool or your friends. The only proper everyday use for caesium is fishing.


As for the shrinking with lasers...old news....Wayne Szalinski did this in the 80's. There was a great documentary about him accidentally shrinking his children and then having to find them in his backyard. Brilliant man, that Szalinski.

I'm pretty sure that got an award at the Sundance Film Festival
See less See more
3
Pew, pew anyone?
anybody want the obligatory shoop-da-woop comment ?
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top