Overclock.net banner

1 - 5 of 5 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
424 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I have made the switch from using AIbooster and Nvidia Control Panel to Everest for temp monitoring. After a day of use I have noticed that Everest displays my cpu temp almost -4 to 5* C lower than Aibooster showed it at full load, and gpu comes in at almost-10* C lower than NVC shows it at during full and idle. Everst only shows 1 temp sensor for CPU (and its not diode) and 1 for GPU Diode. However it does show the case ambient (motherboard) as what it usually is from 28* - 32*C. Is Everest accurate or do I need to go back to using 2 progs to monitor temps. Here is a pic of temps while folding. It shows cpu @ 41* and unfortunately i don't have AI installed so I can't show it to you but I know it usually hovers around 45* after folding all night.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.overclock.net/attachment.php?s=4b5c745b70a061d0eb4ded62bba41b8f&attachmentid=33721" target="_blank" title="">Attachment 33721</a><br />
<br />
Any help is greatly appreciated because if these temps are RIGHT I can go for more on the card. I ran it last night @ 650/1750 playing oblivion for about 3 hrs and NVC showed temps over 80* but Everest showed less than 65*.<br />
<br />
Thanks again guys <img src="/images/smilies/biggrin.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Big Grin" class="inlineimg" /><br />
<br />
Shaggyt<img src="/images/smilies/thumb.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Thumb" class="inlineimg" /><br><a href="http://assets.overclock.net.s3.amazonaws.com/1/19/19fa9494_vbattach33721.jpeg"><img src="http://www.overclock.net/image/id/616662/width/525/height/525/flags/LL"></a>
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
7,351 Posts
Everest has always worked great for me and the temps that it shows is always the same as my other programs like speedfan and ITEGuardian so its pretty accurate <img src="/images/smilies/biggrin.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Big Grin" class="inlineimg" />
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
424 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
Why would it show different temps than the progs I was using??? I'm just a lil confused how these programs differ so much on temps and which ones I should trust before I cook my card and cpu going for more lol <img alt="" class="inlineimg" src="/images/smilies/eek.gif" style="border:0px solid;" title="EEK!"><br><br>
Shaggyt<img alt="" class="inlineimg" src="/images/smilies/thumb.gif" style="border:0px solid;" title="Thumb">
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
424 Posts
Discussion Starter #4
Ok I think cpu temp prob was the fact I had AIboost version from driver cd and installing newest aiboost temps match on cpu b ut on the gpu I still have a radical difference. Why is this??<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.overclock.net/attachment.php?s=7cbacc57dd35bcffd2623e1b5502316d&attachmentid=33775" target="_blank" title="">Attachment 33775</a><br />
<br />
There is 10*c difference between the two at idle(currently folding at the moment), like I said earlier I just want to know which temp to trust.<br />
<br />
Shaggyt<img src="/images/smilies/thumb.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Thumb" class="inlineimg" /><br><a href="http://assets.overclock.net.s3.amazonaws.com/c/c5/c55ab363_vbattach33775.jpeg"><img src="http://www.overclock.net/image/id/616622/width/525/height/525/flags/LL"></a>
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,926 Posts
In my case, I'd definitely trust Nvidia Control Panel. So I'm gonna take a stab at saying that Everest doesn't display the correct GPU temperature. [/sarcasm] I don't know what to trust. :S<br />
<br />
<a href="http://img152.imageshack.us/my.php?image=everestty3.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/8340/everestty3.th.jpg" border="0" alt="" onload="NcodeImageResizer.createOn(this);" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://img92.imageshack.us/my.php?image=everest2ep0.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://img92.imageshack.us/img92/3158/everest2ep0.th.jpg" border="0" alt="" onload="NcodeImageResizer.createOn(this);" /></a>
 
1 - 5 of 5 Posts
Top