Overclock.net banner

1 - 9 of 9 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
7,143 Posts
Wish they would keep the model numbers as the quad core counterparts
Like....
X6 955
X6 965
 

·
PC Evangelist
Joined
·
46,962 Posts
95W X6 not bad.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,249 Posts
Quote:


Originally Posted by bobbyt2012
View Post

Title says "Clocks Leaked," yet there are no clocks to be found in this post for the Thuban series. Wikipedia has all this stuff anyway.

There is. They mentioned that Gigabyter put it up on their site, but we already knew this since it was posted a while ago.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,113 Posts
Quote:


Originally Posted by kaivorth
View Post

Wish they would keep the model numbers as the quad core counterparts
Like....
X6 955
X6 965

They changed the model numbers because the version with the "T" is based on the X6 model. Ex: the Phenom II X4 960T is actually a X6 with 2 disabled cores. I think the convention still follows that the higher the model number the "better" or "faster" the chip, so it would make sense for the X6 to get into the 1000s.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
4,807 Posts
Quote:


Originally Posted by Shadow_UGZ
View Post

They changed the model numbers because the version with the "T" is based on the X6 model. Ex: the Phenom II X4 960T is actually a X6 with 2 disabled cores. I think the convention still follows that the higher the model number the "better" or "faster" the chip, so it would make sense for the X6 to get into the 1000s.

T stands for turbo brah.

Anyways 1035T here I come.
 
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
Top