Added.I tried every trick I could think of with the ambient hardware I have last night.I used your score of 5403 (was the top score at the time I checked) as the target and went to work. A solid 9 hours or so later I finally said goodnight . . . at 5:19am ***
3dMark TimeSpy gpu score : 5404
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/10683750
Added.
Not added - no Benchmate.Hope this is valid
Added.
Added.all i could squeeze out of my chip
Added 2D, the 3D benchmarks were missing a Futuremark link.Hello Overclock.net Admin-Mod team,
I'm SArie_ (read as Arie_S)
And here's my submission
1) Time spy
2) Fire Strike
3) SuperPi 32M
4) Cinnebench R20
5) PiFast
I'm new to oc scene and learning up so please do bear with me
Added.SPi 32M and PiFast scores
Not added - HWInfo is not allowed in the rules.
Added.Hopefully, I will be able to optimize it some more tomorrow and fix anything if I missed anything.
I can't quite fit R20 on the screen fully.
Added.FS- 20106
https://www.3dmark.com/fs/21744112
TS-5568
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/10508175
CBR20 = 7183
Added.Last minute decision to enter
Not added - full 3D benchmarks not run and HWMonitor missing.
Added.Final scores, not sure any more is going to happen with the problems I had (moisture, dud memory and coldslow). Please excuse the rubbish rig pic, it's been a rough couple of days.
Extreme category
Timespy - 5233 - https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/44291003
Firestrike - 19449 - https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/44258998
Added.2D update with my 8086K Ambiente.
PiFast
-----------
32m
------------
Update
R20
-------
Update
RiG Pic
------------
Nice Comp, thanks for mods
Added.update 32m
250,679
Added.Small update pifast:
Added.Unfortunately between lack of time and gear dying I never got past the testing stage. Anyway here's a few test runs.
R20
Timespy
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/44331629
Firestrike
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/44331665
Rig Pic
Added.Well, where to start.
Had way to much trouble with the RX 580 on cold.
Had a first session with was pretty solid but the 2nd and so on it only gave me more issues.
Mem cold bug, degradation or something else , who knows.
Normally I enjoy taking gpu's cold but this one wasn't so much fun :-(
Here are my scores. could have done way better but due to lack of time and a wicked amount of work I didnt had room to improve.
Not going for the topspots and am happy if I get a random draw
I am not even sure if my screens are valid
I do always enjoy these comps and want to thank all those involved keeping this alive and making this possible.
Keep up the great work. I really appreciate your effort!
Als want to thank the sponsors for making it possible to distribute some of these awesome prizes!
Time Spy: 5598 Link: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/44331451
Fire Strike: 18806 Link: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/44331478
Cinebench R20: 6758
Spi 32M: 266.251s
Pifast: 11.61s
Added.CINEBENCH R20: 3716
Super_PI_32M: 261.971
pifast: 8.86
Not added - HWInfo not allowed in the rules.Firestrike update http://www.3dmark.com/fs/21939807 19073
Timespy ambient submission http://www.3dmark.com/spy/10803230 5120
Added.Firestrike 19060 ambinet
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/44336384?
2D added, 3D invalid as no Futuremark links.I liked this PC a lot better when it was a copper loop with a GTX 1080 lol. It was still fun to do something with it one last time before she gets parted out for good.
Added.Hi all
Last hour participation
Time Spy: 5249 Link: http://www.3dmark.com/spy/10792641
Fire Strike: 14670 Link: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/21931828
Cinebench R20 : 4555
PIFast : 18.98s
SuperPI : 514.506s
System
Added.Just my luck. I posted this last night; and I can't find it on the forum, so here it is again.
Here is all I have to show after hours of attempts these last weeks.
Cinebench R20 Score: 1287/4 = 321.75
Pifast Score: 17.04
SuperPi 32M Score: 469.360
I was going to use my Ryzen 2600 for this competition. I soon found out that my overclock that tested stable with games and some bench loads wasn't Cinebench R20 stable. I eventually gave up trying to find the highest overclock that would let CBR20 complete, and tried testing the RX580 I bought.
Whenever I tried running Firestrike or Timespy, the sytem info check would never complete. After turning system info off the benches would complete, so I knew the RX580 was good to go.
It was time to get out my trusty Z77 and 3570k to get the posted 2D benches and find the RX580's limits. A few Mhz later I found out that the 3DMark benches wouldn't complete with the core at much over 1420Mhz. I was going to mess with the memory timings anyway, so I figured I'd use the Bios mod to add more core voltage too. I tried many combinations of memory timings, voltages and power limits; but it didn't make much difference. Even with max power limits and 1.3V on the core, the 3dMark benches wouldn't complete once the core got near 1450Mhz or more.
No visible artifacts, just one of three things. Either a scene freeze or black screen flashes that return to a empty result window with error message, or black screen lockup. Other 3D benches would run and not show artifacts until the core was well over 1500Mhz. Temperature readings were in the 60s to low 70s at the most.
I kept trying night after night; and finally Timespy completed with the core at 1470Mhz and a memory timing tweak. I quickly got all the windows arranged for the screenshot and found out that this new version of 3DMark won't save the result without a license. Well, I didn't exactly rage quit; but I did run from the room screaming. When I came back I figured I may as well run Firestrike with the dialed in overclock. Firestrike didn't complete, and returned to the empty result window with error message. Ahh, insult to injury.
At least I'm in the lucky draw.
Thanks Mods.
Not added - edited after the deadline.Time Spy
6019
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/10718206
Fire Strike
21003
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/44344041
R20
7043
PiFast
8,90
32M
297,312
Should have been in first post, but fine.Forgot to post rig picture.
Hoping to get in on time![]()
Added.
Added 2D, 3D not valid as no GPUTemp.3D FS = 10468
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/44350182
3D TS = 4017
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/44350097
R20 = 2837
Spi32M = 552.985s
PiFast = 17.04s
All minimal requirements for an acceptable sub were available in Post #1 for you to see. Why ask someone else?****. Don't believe i used hwinfo instead of hwmonitor....
You now i almost asked someone to check my submissions just incase something was missing or wrong.
Unbelievable.
Yeah, i just mis-read HWinfo/HWmonitor.All minimal requirements for an acceptable sub were available in Post #1 for you to see. Why ask someone else?
Everyone needs to start somewhere.Yeah, i just mis-read HWinfo/HWmonitor.
Reason i almost asked is because they were fairly late submissions and being my first comp i was a little paranoid i'd maybe made a mistake. Which i did..lol
GtiJason posted an explanation to help you out.I specifically asked mod about this issue
Oops, will fix.Why i added after Deadline? It was postet at 29.02.2020 5:29 PM Pacific Time. You must look at your Server.
ah, geeze. Ask next time! We're here to help.Yeah, i just mis-read HWinfo/HWmonitor.
Reason i almost asked is because they were fairly late submissions and being my first comp i was a little paranoid i'd maybe made a mistake. Which i did..lol
you have a copy of BM0.11 I assume... can you test to verify the "fixes"?
On 1/14/2020 at 10:46 PM said:You are probably using a CPU that is currently not supported. The AES-NI instruction set is necessary for now to do fast file integrity checks.
The next version, BenchMate 0.11, won't need the instruction set and runs even on socket 775. That's the oldest platform I have here for testing. It will be available for download in the next couple of days (asap).