I really starting to like Ati's naming scheme, the higher the number the higher the performance. Nice and straight forward
Keep it up Ati
Keep it up Ati
1 - 20 of 23 Posts
^ agree.
Gimme 30-50% increase in performance for the 5670 over the 4670 please
![]()
Worth it if only for the DX11 and cheap crossfire.
Gimme 30-50% increase in performance for the 5670 over the 4670 please
Quote:
shader-wise it makes sense so far too.
2x 5750s = 5850 shader count
2x 5770s = 5870 shader count
2x 5870s = 5970 shader count
![]()
Originally Posted by BLADEY  I really starting to like Ati's naming scheme, the higher the number the higher the performance. Nice and straight forward Keep it up Ati |
2x 5750s = 5850 shader count
2x 5770s = 5870 shader count
2x 5870s = 5970 shader count
2
Quote:
this
Originally Posted by DeadSkull Wake me up when Cypress XTX specs are out. |
Quote:
Fixed.
![]()
I want one so bad. I'm sure it'll be a while before they do that, though...same thing happened with the 4830.
Originally Posted by DeadSkull Wake me up when the 5830 is released. |
2
Quote:
simple, why do u buy the latest stepping CPU? because itsthe most refined of the lot.... the xx90s are the ones built after the refinement of all the processes involved. What i was told about my 4890 anyway, no i dont have proof
Originally Posted by rico2001 People love the HD XX90's for some reason. I don't understand the fascination. All the cards are good and the 5890 will just be another card in the 5800 line and fit the performance range between the 5870 and 5950. |
Quote:
Well 4850x2 completely sucked so I do not have high hopes for this gen either.
Fact of the matter is with HD 5870 ATI is not really trying.
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/gra...ure-analysis/4
Quote:
Beefed up pwms, 8+6pin power connectors and refined cores if not totally enhanced (think 2000 shaders / 40 ROPs, albeit original rumour at xbit was 1920 shaders but that just doesn't make sense considering how rv870 arch works) means we're looking at either 925 or 950Mhz stock core clocks.
Yea baby
![]()
Originally Posted by rico2001 People love the HD XX90's for some reason. I don't understand the fascination. All the cards are good and the 5890 will just be another card in the 5800 line and fit the performance range between the 5870 and 5950. |
Fact of the matter is with HD 5870 ATI is not really trying.
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/gra...ure-analysis/4
Quote:
One of the most impressive parts of the card is its power circuitry, which is entirely digital and spread across the PCB. The GPU is powered by four Volterra VT1157SF digital PWMs controlled by a Volterra VT1165MF voltage regulator. As if that's not enough, there are provisions for a fifth phase, should AMD release a faster version of the 5870 later down the line. |
Yea baby
2
Quote:
Everyone will love that price.
Originally Posted by DjiXas I want DX11 GPU for $49 |
Quote:
For $49 I wouldn't care which DX version it used, because I wouldn't be playing a game with a $49 GPU. How many "PC Gamers" would? Not flaming, just being honest.
Originally Posted by DjiXas I want DX11 GPU for $49 |
Quote:
Tons of gamers do that actually. Only a tiny minority bothers following up on latest pc hardware and gpu tech.
Originally Posted by lordikon For $49 I wouldn't care which DX version it used, because I wouldn't be playing a game with a $49 GPU. How many "PC Gamers" would? Not flaming, just being honest. |
1 - 20 of 23 Posts
