I want to bear ATi's children.
1 - 20 of 52 Posts
I get a warm fuzzy feeling looking at a 1Ghz clock speed on a GPU
![]()
wow 1GHz, feels soo 2000
![]()
I was going to get myself an 4850, but I might hold back and save abit more to get this
![]()
Jesus christ FUD has gone off the deep end. They release totally BS news articles about the RV790 every other freaking day. Other than minor modifications to the architecture to facilitate the move to a more matured version of the 55nm process (which equates to the higher clock speeds), the numerical specifications of the RV790 remain absolutely identical to the RV770, other than clock speeds of course.
And if FUD were posting similar news articles, except they were about nvidia, you can bet what kind of responses it would be met with on OCN. "Psh, it's just FUD, don't believe any of it".
![]()
Now I am not trying to paint the RV790 in a bad light. It will be a great move for ATI, especially if the clock speeds and overclocking potential hold up. Depending on how it performs and overclocks, I may get one myself.
The only thing I have a problem with is all the ridiculous claims that FUD has been spewing as of late, at an increasing rate to boot. If you will recall, they published an article claiming that the RV790 was going to be a brand new architecture with few similarities to the RV770. Was that met with questioning on OCN? I think you guys can guess. This is one of the most biased and hypocritical forums on the entire internets.
And if FUD were posting similar news articles, except they were about nvidia, you can bet what kind of responses it would be met with on OCN. "Psh, it's just FUD, don't believe any of it".
Now I am not trying to paint the RV790 in a bad light. It will be a great move for ATI, especially if the clock speeds and overclocking potential hold up. Depending on how it performs and overclocks, I may get one myself.
The only thing I have a problem with is all the ridiculous claims that FUD has been spewing as of late, at an increasing rate to boot. If you will recall, they published an article claiming that the RV790 was going to be a brand new architecture with few similarities to the RV770. Was that met with questioning on OCN? I think you guys can guess. This is one of the most biased and hypocritical forums on the entire internets.
Quote:
I was with you until you said "internets".
This card probably won't be in my budget for a very long time, but I do hope there are definitely other improvements than just clock speed, and that this article holds more credibility than 003 gives it.
Originally Posted by 003 ...entire internets. |
I was with you until you said "internets".
This card probably won't be in my budget for a very long time, but I do hope there are definitely other improvements than just clock speed, and that this article holds more credibility than 003 gives it.
Quote:
yes we all want to
Originally Posted by CuriouslyHigh I want to bear ATi's children. |
003 - i believe the phrase you are looking for is "fanboy loaded".
![]()
NB: fanboy is a synonym for "idiot", "delusional person" and "blind moron".
NB: fanboy is a synonym for "idiot", "delusional person" and "blind moron".
2
Allow me to pick this one apart...
Quote:
You seem to have better sources than FUD, care to share? Otherwise you're talking out of your ***.
Quote:
Here you go again with you subjective point of view of OCN. Maybe you just need to stay out of threads that deal with ATI or AMD for a while. Take a break big guy.
Quote:
ZOMG...there's more than one internet?!?!
Quote:
Originally Posted by 003 Other than minor modifications to the architecture to facilitate the move to a more matured version of the 55nm process (which equates to the higher clock speeds), the numerical specifications of the RV790 remain absolutely identical to the RV770, other than clock speeds of course. |
Quote:
And if FUD were posting similar news articles, except they were about nvidia, you can bet what kind of responses it would be met with on OCN. "Psh, it's just FUD, don't believe any of it".
|
Quote:
... on the entire internets. |
2
Quote:
fanboy they are called rumours, they get information and share it we will only know if it is true when the final product has been tested. didnt you all expected the 4850/4870 to have 600 shadrs? how much was it realesed with putting a kick to the throat of nvidia 800
another thing I notice is that you nvidia fanboys dont know what the meaning of the word biased or hypocrit.. how can the users be hypocrits and i asume most of them neither works for ati or nvidia?
Originally Posted by 003 Jesus christ FUD has gone off the deep end. They release totally BS news articles about the RV790 every other freaking day. Other than minor modifications to the architecture to facilitate the move to a more matured version of the 55nm process (which equates to the higher clock speeds), the numerical specifications of the RV790 remain absolutely identical to the RV770, other than clock speeds of course. And if FUD were posting similar news articles, except they were about nvidia, you can bet what kind of responses it would be met with on OCN. "Psh, it's just FUD, don't believe any of it".
Now I am not trying to paint the RV790 in a bad light. It will be a great move for ATI, especially if the clock speeds and overclocking potential hold up. Depending on how it performs and overclocks, I may get one myself. The only thing I have a problem with is all the ridiculous claims that FUD has been spewing as of late, at an increasing rate to boot. If you will recall, they published an article claiming that the RV790 was going to be a brand new architecture with few similarities to the RV770. Was that met with questioning on OCN? I think you guys can guess. This is one of the most biased and hypocritical[/B] forums on the entire internets. |
another thing I notice is that you nvidia fanboys dont know what the meaning of the word biased or hypocrit.. how can the users be hypocrits and i asume most of them neither works for ati or nvidia?
2
Quote:
Is the number of pins numerical specification?
![]()
Originally Posted by 003 the numerical specifications of the RV790 remain absolutely identical to the RV770, other than clock speeds of course. |
1 - 20 of 52 Posts
