Joined
·
7 Posts
Hey guys, so I am a little green to this overclocking thing, I'm use to easy one click overclocking on old mobos but now it seems I would have to do manual input on this new Gigabyte Aorus Master motherboard. I did not de-lid my cpu nor lapped it, although now i am considering getting this thing de-lidded or return to microcenter because it is so friggin hot. I did the spin test on a glass surface and it does not spin.
Settings used after having default load optimization :
https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/threads/9900k-5ghz-1-2v-guide-gigabyte-z390-master.18837783/
I had to set Dynamic Vcore (DVID) to +0.050 to be stable at 5 ghz. +0.035 for 4.9 ghz.
Pretty much used settings in the link as well as using XMP profile (Corsair Dominator Platinum 32 gb @ 3200 Mhz) - though in bios says its using 1.38 when ram should be at 1.35 from factory but oh well.
Same profile used on all test (5 ghz):
First CPU Cooler used:
H100i Pro + coollaboratory pro (LIQUID METAL) on surface of IHS and Cooler. under Cinebench I would hit 100C on 1 core with all other cores in mid 90's
I then heard that putting Liquid metal on IHS = bad so decided to switch
Second CPU Cooler used:
Noctua Nh-D15
Super quiet in my case however under Cinebench I was hitting 100C on 3 cores! I used Thermal Grizzley kryonaut All other cores max temps in high 90's
Third CPU Cooler
This is my current cooler:
Kraken x72 with push/pull config with radiator mounted on top. Under Cinebench: 1 core would reach 100C with all other cores maxing out around mid to high 90's...with exception of one being 88 degrees (What the?).
One thing of note: under HWmonitor/info i noticed about all of my cores under VID is sitting at over 2 volts....(Confused).
Was this a bad OC guide?
Gaming temps will hit 80 after maybe after an hour (Assassin's Creed Odyssey) , otherwise itll be mid 70's at most times on first boot. Beyond the hour maybe going into 2.5-3.5 hours, I'll start seeing spikes of temps to 90's at the corner of my screen and then I'll stop playing.
Liquid temp seems to get around low 40's to mid 40's after gaming.
Using 4.9 ghz i can game a little longer maybe 4-5 hours before even seeing it go pass 90 degrees.
Settings used after having default load optimization :
https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/threads/9900k-5ghz-1-2v-guide-gigabyte-z390-master.18837783/
I had to set Dynamic Vcore (DVID) to +0.050 to be stable at 5 ghz. +0.035 for 4.9 ghz.
Pretty much used settings in the link as well as using XMP profile (Corsair Dominator Platinum 32 gb @ 3200 Mhz) - though in bios says its using 1.38 when ram should be at 1.35 from factory but oh well.
Same profile used on all test (5 ghz):
First CPU Cooler used:
H100i Pro + coollaboratory pro (LIQUID METAL) on surface of IHS and Cooler. under Cinebench I would hit 100C on 1 core with all other cores in mid 90's
I then heard that putting Liquid metal on IHS = bad so decided to switch
Second CPU Cooler used:
Noctua Nh-D15
Super quiet in my case however under Cinebench I was hitting 100C on 3 cores! I used Thermal Grizzley kryonaut All other cores max temps in high 90's
Third CPU Cooler
This is my current cooler:
Kraken x72 with push/pull config with radiator mounted on top. Under Cinebench: 1 core would reach 100C with all other cores maxing out around mid to high 90's...with exception of one being 88 degrees (What the?).
One thing of note: under HWmonitor/info i noticed about all of my cores under VID is sitting at over 2 volts....(Confused).
Was this a bad OC guide?
Gaming temps will hit 80 after maybe after an hour (Assassin's Creed Odyssey) , otherwise itll be mid 70's at most times on first boot. Beyond the hour maybe going into 2.5-3.5 hours, I'll start seeing spikes of temps to 90's at the corner of my screen and then I'll stop playing.
Liquid temp seems to get around low 40's to mid 40's after gaming.
Using 4.9 ghz i can game a little longer maybe 4-5 hours before even seeing it go pass 90 degrees.