Overclock.net banner

1 - 5 of 5 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,679 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
is this a good score for my Raid 0 setup??<br><a href="http://assets.overclock.net.s3.amazonaws.com/8/8d/8d37ab34_vbattach34319.jpeg"><img src="http://www.overclock.net/image/id/616203/width/525/height/525/flags/LL"></a>
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
64,288 Posts
Doesnt seem to bad to me. However im no expert. Even if the RAID array wasnt functioning to its fullest you can still rest assured its a significant improvement over Non raid.<img src="/images/smilies/thumb.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Thumb" class="inlineimg" />
 

·
 
Joined
·
29,532 Posts
For raptors, I've seen higher. It is still a kickass speed though.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
24,372 Posts
Run HD Tach and ATTO and compare/post here:<br />
<a href="http://www.overclock.net/hard-drives-storage/111116-official-hd-database-benchmark-raid-single.html?highlight=official+RAID%5C" target="_blank">http://www.overclock.net/hard-drives...ficial+RAID%5C</a><br />
<br />
Links provided in that thread.<br />
<br />
Also, check my RAID performance FAQ.... your score definately seems low for Raptors... I'd expect over 250 MB/s<br />
<br />
When I had my quartet in RAID0 for testing, I got 216 MB/s in HDTach and even more 248 MB/s in SiSandra (which is a bit skewed since it relies more on Windows, while HDTach is more directly communicating with the hard disk itself, bypassing any kind of cache in RAM)
 
1 - 5 of 5 Posts
Top