[franz]

(nVidia)
Model: 9600GT
Shader (MHz): 1900MHz
OS: Vista 32
Driver: 182.08

Benchmarks:
353pt: 4013
384pt: 3420
420pt:
511pt: 2494
768pt: 3438
1888pt: 3405

Notes: 3 GPUs running 24/7 same rig. Not sure what difference that makes on results.

 

[franz]

Here are my results from the 182.50 driver. No noticeable difference from the 182.08, a few PPD here and there.

(nVidia)
Model: 9600GT
Shader (MHz): 1900
OS: Vista 32bit
Driver: 182.50

Benchmarks:
353pt:4013
384pt:3420
420pt:
472pt:3456
511pt:2439
768pt:
1888pt:3398

 

[franz]

Quote:

Originally Posted by mortimersnerd I need to update this. Currently the server that the files were hosted on was hacked to hell and back so I have to finish playing cleanup. After that, I will go though and update the .xls file and post a new SS as well as inbed it as a google doc.

Sorry to hear about that. I am glad you are still updating though, I appreciate the effort.

 

[franz]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaos Assasson up this should be stickied

It is in the folding essentials sticky.

 

[franz]

Quote:

Originally Posted by CravinR1 UPDATE Name: ECS 8800 GTS 512mb 5765: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:00:52 - 5,865.2 PPD 5766: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:00:52 - 5,865.2 PPD 5767: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:00:52 - 5,865.2 PPD 5768: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:00:52 - 5,865.2 PPD 5771: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:00:51 - 5,980.2 PPD 5772: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:00:53 - 5,754.6 PPD 6600: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:21 - 4,800.0 PPD 6602: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:18 - 4,984.6 PPD 6603: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:20 - 4,860.0 PPD 6604: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:17 - 5,049.4 PPD 6605: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:19 - 4,921.5 PPD 6606: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:17 - 5,049.4 PPD 10502: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:40 - 5,071.7 PPD 10504: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:38 - 5,175.2 PPD Name: EVGA 8800 GTS 320mb Superclocked 5765: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:17 - 3,960.9 PPD 5767: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:17 - 3,960.9 PPD 5768: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:17 - 3,960.9 PPD 5770: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:18 - 3,910.2 PPD 5905: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:08:25 - 3,230.2 PPD 6602: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:49 - 3,567.0 PPD 6603: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:49 - 3,567.0 PPD 6604: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:50 - 3,534.5 PPD 6606: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:49 - 3,567.0 PPD 10503: Avg. Time / Frame : 00:02:14 - 3,784.8 PPD

It would probably be easier for Zodac if you converted the projects into WUs. It is listed in the benchmark, but you can also reference the project database.

So:
5765-5770=353WU
5905=1888WU
6602-6604=450WU
10503=587WU

I think zodac already has enough work to do.

 

[franz]

Quote:

Originally Posted by paulharrison123 I only seem to get 611pt credit WUs can i get others with a higher pt value?

Not right now. The only projects currently being distributed are the 611 WUs. In a way that is good because your PPD will be very stable day to day.

Added my GTX 465 info.

EDIT: I messed up the chart Zodac!!!! I entered Vista 64 like a noob and now each entry is taking up two lines. U can haz editz?

 

[franz]

Quote:

Originally Posted by zodac Already done.

Sweet! I came back just to make you work harder.

I added my last entry for my 465s. I did it right this time.

 

[franz]

Updating my GTX 465 results with new WUs:

912 WU:
1400MHz 12900
1500MHz: 13800
1600MHz: 14600

925WU
1400MHz: 14000
1500MHz: 14800
1600MHz: 15700

 

[franz]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trigunflame Am I alone in finding that an increased memory OC offers little to no performance improvement for folding? I've been keeping my memory clocks @ stock, I didn't see any change whatsoever; even when going from 1900 to 2100.

You are not alone. GPU2 folding uses little GPU Ram (even less with GPU3) so memory OC has little or no affect on PPD. Leave it at stock and be happy.

 

[franz]

Updated info for GTX 560 Ti at 1800 and 1900MHz shader. Added new info for 2000MHz shader.

 

[franz]

Windows, and again, each project is different, some WU's have the 2060 putting out 1.7, seen it as low as 1.1 mil. I have gotten more out of it with an OC, but the newer betas do NOT like OCs at all, so its running stock. I'd say a good average without failed WU's is around 1.5 Million.

What are your stock clocks, is it a Super? My 2060 is only around 1.2 average with 1950MHz core, also on Windows.

 

[franz]

Added around 10 projects for the RTX 2060, non super variant. Nice little GPU that never goes below 1mil PPD and averages high 1.1mil PPD over multiple projects.