Overclock.net banner
1 - 19 of 2329 Posts

· Fold on!
Joined
·
8,223 Posts
Quote:

Originally Posted by staryoshi View Post
GTS 450 does 12700 for me as a dedicated folder using the 925 WUs. It's at factory clocks (slight factory OC @ 822Mhz core).

It only did ~6600 PPD using standard GPU3 WUs... make sure to add -advmethods for great success!

It's amazing. That's more points than my stock GTX 460/470 pull... -_-

And I found out why! (See attachment for lolz) EVGA, you rapscallions.
I'm now 100% sure that I'll get a gts450, maybe 2
 

· Fold on!
Joined
·
8,223 Posts
I took a 3-5k impact on the cpu with 2 fermi's too. And thats an intel so it goes for both.
The problem is that 2 gpu3 clients with fermi's will use 10% cpu power. A few % for windows and you are using more than one core.

I'll try to cut down as much windows usage as possible to get the cpu at the full 7 cores doing bigadv and the gpu's at full power too.
 

· Fold on!
Joined
·
8,223 Posts
Project ID: 10928
Core: OPENMMGPU
Credit: 925
Frames: 100

Name: GTS450 1st rig
Path: C:\\Users\\Bastiaan\\AppData\\Roaming\\[email protected] e-gpu1\\
Number of Frames Observed: 300

Min. Time / Frame : 00:00:52 - 15,369.2 PPD
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:00:53 - 15,079.2 PPD

This goes for all the 925 units for the gts450.

EVGA GTS450 SuperClocked 925core 1850shaders 1900ram.
Drivers: 260.89 with win7 64 bit.
 

· Fold on!
Joined
·
8,223 Posts
Quote:

Originally Posted by lawrencendlw View Post
Well all 925 units for YOUR GTS 450 at the clock speeds that you have yours set too lol... Leave it to a dutchman to think that because his GTS 450 does so many points per day that ALL GTS 450 will only do so many PPD lol...
You got me wrong mate, I'm talking about my cards like that.
The GTS, the GTX and so on

I never meant it like every GTS will do that kind of points


Quote:

Originally Posted by denis6902 View Post
whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat GTS 450 doing 15kPPD???
dude thats crazy, i think i have been missing out this thread for some days now


I wonder when the dual GTX 460 comes out it should be doing at least 22K ppd


Thats crazy, almost doing the GTX 295 points with much less watts, crazy!
Yep, its doing 15kppd

And 2 gtx460's are doing 28-30k combined on 9xx units. A gtx275 at the same clocks as a 295 will do 50% of the points. So 2 gtx275's will do the same as a 295, at least thats what I had in my situation. I hope that the dual 460 will do at least 28k on 9xx units, otherwise I'll stick with the cooler and low watt 450's
 

· Fold on!
Joined
·
8,223 Posts
Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperXX View Post
I want to see what the GTX 460s do on these new work units. I am stuck trying to figure out if I should stick with my GTS 450s or go with 460s. :/
My 460's are doing 10-11kppd on the 6800 units at 875mhz core.
You can see some information here: http://bastiaannl.yourfreehosting.net/HFM/summary.html

Dont look at the 460 clocks there, I downclocked them a bit for problems, not enoug airflow around the gpu's
 

· Fold on!
Joined
·
8,223 Posts
Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperXX View Post
Thanks. Now to decide if 3k is work ~30-40 more per card. Why cant building folding rigs be simpler? lol
Do you care about the power draw? I would go for 450's cause they are really efficient. If you want to play a few games you could go for the 460, get the 1gb version
 

· Fold on!
Joined
·
8,223 Posts
Crazy power draw with core 22 WUs. 2x2080Tis:
:O
Really enjoy the PPD the core 22 gets (3.8mil on a stock 2080Ti).
In combination with the 7700k folding at 6 cores I see 550W from my wall powermonitor.
GPU-Z shows a little over 300W on the 2080Ti alone.
I'm not seeing the same PPD/power draw on all the 22 units though, there is some difference.
 

· Fold on!
Joined
·
8,223 Posts
Here is the link for when it's working properly.

And here is the whole database in txt format.
I copied it for myself just to look at it if the google doc is not working.
Code:
GPU Folding Projects - Performance
SummaryChartsSorted by Project #Sorted by GPUSorted by PPDSorted by OS
GPU                Core     VRAM     Shaders PPD         FP32 [GFlops]    uArch    Sample Size
GeForce GT 1030            1,850    3,453    384    67,729        1,421    Pascal    1
GeForce GT 630            1,636    2,174    96    2,530        314    Fermi    2
GeForce GT 740            1,059    667    384    13,928        813    Kepler    2
GeForce GTX 460            1,510    3,600    336    18,639        1,015    Fermi    7
GeForce GTX 470            1,308    3,348    448    28,631        1,172    Fermi    2
GeForce GTX 480            1,614    3,760    480    45,292        1,549    Fermi    15
GeForce GTX 560            1,774    4,072    336    30,233        1,192    Fermi    3
GeForce GTX 560 Ti        1,700    4,104    384    22,699        1,306    Fermi    2
GeForce GTX 560 Ti [448]    1,700    4,040    448    38,098        1,523    Fermi    5
GeForce GTX 570            1,820    3,200    480    39,939        1,747    Fermi    1
GeForce GTX 580            1,601    4,008    512    42,756        1,639    Fermi    10
GeForce GTX 650 Ti        1,119    5,400    768    29,534        1,719    Kepler    13
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost    1,052    6,177    768    48,146        1,616    Kepler    15
GeForce GTX 660            1,192    6,006    960    55,957        2,289    Kepler    4
GeForce GTX 660 Ti        1,233    6,008    1,344    75,760        3,314    Kepler    46
GeForce GTX 670            1,186    6,021    1,344    88,608        3,187    Kepler    16
GeForce GTX 680            1,268    5,955    1,536    106,878        3,896    Kepler    19
GeForce GTX 750 Ti        1,287    4,886    640    80,621        1,647    Maxwell    6
GeForce GTX 760            1,197    6,005    1,152    85,693        2,759    Kepler    3
GeForce GTX 770            1,245    7,301    1,536    105,907        3,824    Kepler    18
GeForce GTX 780            1,195    5,959    2,304    190,633        5,506    Kepler    41
GeForce GTX 780 Ti        1,163    6,658    2,880    268,072        6,701    Kepler    51
GeForce GTX 950            1,411    6,702    768    130,343        2,167    Maxwell    2
GeForce GTX 960            1,456    5,280    1,024    189,537        2,982    Maxwell    22
GeForce GTX 970            1,446    6,908    1,664    345,242        4,813    Maxwell    47
GeForce GTX 980            1,503    6,073    2,048    443,577        6,157    Maxwell    77
GeForce GTX 980 Ti        1,398    6,796    2,816    656,361        7,873    Maxwell    86
GeForce GTX 1050        1,870    6,205    1,129    166,086        4,275    Pascal    5
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti        1,894    6,968    768    201,208        2,910    Pascal    23
GeForce GTX 1050M        1,514    4,280    640    92,117        1,938    Pascal    2
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB        2,088    8,629    1,152    446,532        4,811    Pascal    1
GeForce GTX 1060 6GB        2,017    7,952    1,280    412,869        5,164    Pascal    29
GeForce GTX 1070        2,046    8,428    1,920    694,918        7,858    Pascal    146
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti        1,987    7,653    2,432    872,040        9,664    Pascal    59
GeForce GTX 1080        2,049    10,011    2,560    876,253        10,491    Pascal    1366
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti        2,002    10,054    3,584    1,310,317    14,352    Pascal    32
GeForce GTX 1650        1,905    8,002    896    262,989        3,414    Turing    1
GeForce GTX 1650 Super        1,905    5,750    1,280    343,439        4,877    Turing    3
GeForce GTX 1660        1,890    4,000    1,408    542        5,322    Turing    1
GeForce GTX 1660 Super        1,920    1,700    1,408    43,527        5,407    Turing    2
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti        1,898    4,088    1,536    710,604        5,829    Turing    6
GeForce GTX TITAN        1,045    7,000    2,688    183,518        5,618    Kepler    1
GeForce GTX TITAN X        1,225    3,177    3,072    866,836        7,528    Maxwell    386
GeForce P104-100        2,050    5,005    1,920    700,961        7,872    Pascal    1
GeForce P106-100        2,050    4,006    1,280    492,813        5,248    Pascal    1
GeForce RTX 2060        1,934    8,193    1,920    1,134,809    7,426    Turing    14
GeForce RTX 2060 Super        1,790    9,400    2,176    1,485,614    7,790    Turing    3
GeForce RTX 2070        1,961    11,531    2,260    1,372,399    8,865    Turing    12
GeForce RTX 2070 Super        1,935    1,410    2,304    1,523,276    8,916    Turing    1
GeForce RTX 2080        1,870    14,000    2,944    1,395,825    11,011    Turing    3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super        1,935    7,500    3,072    2,200,000    11,889    Turing    1
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti        1,941    6,738    4,352    3,017,989    16,892    Turing    2799
GeForce TITAN V            1,270    1,712    5,120    2,669,150    13,002    Tesla    13
GeForce TITAN X (Pascal)    1,993    9,026    3,584    1,422,412    14,289    Tesla    8
GeForce TITAN Xp        2,032    11,564    3,840    1,539,961    15,608    Pascal    10
Quadro K3100M            705    3,200    768    17,044        1,083    Kepler    1
Quadro P2200            139    405    1,280    129,761        356    Pascal    1
Radeon HD 5870            925    5,000    1,600    22,458        2,960    TeraScale 2    1
Radeon HD 7750            940    5,040    512    15,848        963    GCN 1.0    1
Radeon HD 7770            1,075    4,750    640    32,574        1,376    GCN 1.0    2
Radeon HD 7790            1,240    6,400    896    76,287        2,222    GCN 1.1    3
Radeon HD 7850            1,212    5,730    1,024    85,625        2,483    GCN 1.0    16
Radeon HD 7870            1,132    4,406    1,280    104,701        2,897    GCN 1.0    4
Radeon HD 7950            1,104    5,500    1,792    109,075        3,957    GCN 1.0    6
Radeon HD 7970            1,131    5,852    2,048    146,814        4,633    GCN 1.0    29
Radeon R7 370            1,020    5,940    1,024    74,749        2,089    GCN 1.0    5
Radeon R9 270            1,008    5,867    1,280    100,210        2,581    GCN 1.0    3
Radeon R9 270X            1,196    5,925    1,280    95,911        3,062    GCN 1.0    4
Radeon R9 280X            1,098    6,291    2,048    161,273        4,496    GCN 1.0    11
Radeon R9 290            1,072    5,153    2,560    260,723        5,486    GCN 1.1    102
Radeon R9 290X            1,057    5,040    2,816    258,002        5,954    GCN 1.1    17
Radeon R9 295X2            1,030    5,400    2,816    236,941        5,801    GCN 1.1    2
Radeon R9 380            980    5,700    1,792    177,103        3,512    GCN 1.2    1
Radeon R9 380X            1,128    3,750    2,048    99,146        4,618    GCN 1.2    2
Radeon R9 390X            1,105    6,000    2,816    372,471        6,223    GCN 1.1    2
Radeon R9 Fury            1,067    1,000    3,584    401,782        7,647    GCN 1.2    22
Radeon R9 Fury X        1,147    1,005    4,096    500,045        9,394    GCN 1.2    25
Radeon R9 Nano            1,005    1,000    4,096    338,755        8,233    GCN 1.2    8
Radeon RX 460            1,214    5,983    896    98,129        2,175    GCN 1.3    10
Radeon RX 470            1,262    6,733    2,048    267,158        5,170    GCN 1.3    18
Radeon RX 480            1,312    7,319    2,304    310,769        6,046    GCN 1.3    35
Radeon RX 560            1,206    7,148    1,024    113,718        2,469    GCN 1.3    5
Radeon RX 5700            1,690    1,750    2,304    856,448        7,788    RDNA 1.0    1
Radeon RX 5700 XT        1,955    1,769    2,560    1,167,190    10,008    RDNA 1.0    7
Radeon RX 580            1,405    7,598    2,304    330,995        6,475    GCN 1.3    46
Radeon RX 590            1,546    2,009    2,304    343,600        7,126    GCN 1.4    11
Radeon RX Vega 56        1,543    1,346    3,584    1,096,094    11,062    GCN 1.4    5
Radeon RX Vega 64        1,666    1,830    4,096    894,368        13,645    GCN 1.4    42
Radeon RX Vega 8        881    2,200    512    27,292        902    GCN 1.5    2
Radeon Vega FE            1,440    1,890    4,096    642,958        11,796    GCN 1.4    1
Radeon VII            1,812    2,161    3,840    1,822,436    13,913    GCN 1.4    39
 
1 - 19 of 2329 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top