[Anth0789]

You guys got to tell me whats new to add on and where should it go...

 

[Varjo]

Pretty sure 3 GTX285s beat 2 295s, also pretty sure that tri fire 4890s beat 2x4870s Also, 4890x2 definitely beats gtx295

 

[paras]

4890x2 isnt even out how can it beat gtx 295?

 

[DeathTyrant]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anth0789 SLI/Crossfire [*]Geforce GTX295 Quad SLI [*]Geforce GTX285 Tri SLI [*]Radeon HD4890 Tri fire [*]Geforce GTX295 SLI [*]Radeon HD4890 Crossfire [*]Radeon HD4870X2 Crossfire [*]Geforce GTX280 Tri SLI [*]Geforce GTX 275 Tri SLI

I don't quite understand. What is going on here?
If you have 'GTX 295 Quad SLI', then GTX 295 SLI must be the single card, right?
If so, how on earth can it be listed higher than Tri-SLI 280s or 275s?

 

[Anth0789]

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeathTyrant I don't quite understand. What is going on here? If you have 'GTX 295 Quad SLI', then GTX 295 SLI must be the single card, right? If so, how on earth can it be listed higher than Tri-SLI 280s or 275s?

My mistake its fixed!

 

[jouno53]

No idea where a card like this would go, or if you even include non-reference, but where would this be placed?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814127433

I'm not sure if MSI is the only one to carry these, but I would suspect they outperform the 4870 1GB at 1080p or higher. What do you guys think? I don't have any benchies to provide.

 

[sLowEnd]

I'm quite sure the 7300GS is a little better than the 6200
(Though I lack benchmarks. They're 2 rarely compared cards.)

The 4750 isn't even out yet and considering how close the 4770 is to the HD4830, I would imagine that when it does come out, it's not better than the 8800GTX

EDIT:Oh and you're missing the HD4350 and HD4550. They're generally slower than the 9500GT it seems. (but usually faster than the 9400GT)

4550 reviews
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/HD_4550_passive
http://www.guru3d.com/article/ati-ra...-512mb-review/
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/801/
http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=15658

Mixed
http://www.motherboards.org/reviews/...re/1824_9.html
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3420

 

[Anth0789]

Quote:

Originally Posted by sLowEnd I'm quite sure the 7300GS is a little better than the 6200 (Though I lack benchmarks. They're 2 rarely compared cards.) The 4750 isn't even out yet and considering how close the 4770 is to the HD4830, I would imagine that when it does come out, it's not better than the 8800GTX EDIT:Oh and you're missing the HD4350 and HD4550. They're generally slower than the 9500GT it seems. (but usually faster than the 9400GT) 4550 reviews http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/HD_4550_passive http://www.guru3d.com/article/ati-ra...-512mb-review/ http://www.legitreviews.com/article/801/ http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=15658 Mixed http://www.motherboards.org/reviews/...re/1824_9.html http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3420

Yep thanks for info. Fixed! If something is missing or there is an error let me know.

 

[TF876]

HD 4650 needs to be on there, its above the 8600gts but below the 9600GSO, I think it would probably be faster than the 256mb version of the 3850. so just above i guess. Also I think the 4670 seems to be a little high.

http://www.techspot.com/article/125-...nce/page4.html
and
http://www.techspot.com/review/134-b...dup/page3.html

Also this website is awesome for comparing graphics cards for COD5, Fallout3 and Far Cry 2

 

[Anth0789]

Quote:

Originally Posted by TF876 HD 4650 needs to be on there, its above the 8600gts but below the 9600GSO, I think it would probably be faster than the 256mb version of the 3850. so just above i guess. Also I think the 4670 seems to be a little high. http://www.techspot.com/article/125-...nce/page4.html and http://www.techspot.com/review/134-b...dup/page3.html Also this website is awesome for comparing graphics cards for COD5, Fallout3 and Far Cry 2

Good stuff thanks I updated it.

 

[sLowEnd]

Are you sure the 4890 is better than the 4850X2?

The 4850X2 is essentially 4850 crossfire with more RAM

 

[gerikoh]

Quote:

Originally Posted by sLowEnd Are you sure the 4890 is better than the 4850X2? The 4850X2 is essentially 4850 crossfire with more RAM

4850x2 is faster than 285 and 4890. gtx275 is faster than gtx280.

3870 is faster than a 9600gt, 2900xt is faster than both cards.

i'm too busy at school to search for the links atm. but post the links sometime soon.

 

[Anth0789]

Quote:

Originally Posted by gerikoh 4850x2 is faster than 285 and 4890. gtx275 is faster than gtx280. 3870 is faster than a 9600gt, 2900xt is faster than both cards. i'm too busy at school to search for the links atm. but post the links sometime soon.

Imo the 4890 still outperforms the 4850X2.

 

[sLowEnd]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anth0789 Imo the 4890 still outperforms the 4850X2.

What makes you so sure?
It doesnt.

 

[Anth0789]

Quote:

Originally Posted by sLowEnd What makes you so sure? It doesnt.

The 2GB version does...

 

[BlackOmega]

I was looking at your lists and from what I gather the top is "single" cards. Why wouldn't the dual GPU cards be in the SLI/crossfire catagory? Since technically they need to have sli or crossfire enabled to function. I know for a fact that on a GTX295 if SLI is disabled it does REALLY poorly.
Maybe you should make a whole 'nother catagory for the dual GPU cards.

 

[j.woody]

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/radeon...w-31554-6.html
look at the table, Graphics Card Hierarchy Chart. it gives you a pretty good idea of which card performs better. also the 4850x2 is better than the 4890 but performs about the same as a gtx285. And also remeber that a 4850x2 is basically like having 2 cards.

 

[dcshoejake]

http://service.futuremark.com/result...&resultType=19
http://service.futuremark.com/result...&resultType=14
http://service.futuremark.com/result...&resultType=12
http://service.futuremark.com/result...&resultType=10

eVGA GTS 250 1GB

855|2058|1302

Informative post

 

[akeedthe]

whats was wrong with list 4???