[Anth0789]

You guys got to tell me whats new to add on and where should it go...

 

[Anth0789]

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeathTyrant I don't quite understand. What is going on here? If you have 'GTX 295 Quad SLI', then GTX 295 SLI must be the single card, right? If so, how on earth can it be listed higher than Tri-SLI 280s or 275s?

My mistake its fixed!

 

[Anth0789]

Quote:

Originally Posted by sLowEnd I'm quite sure the 7300GS is a little better than the 6200 (Though I lack benchmarks. They're 2 rarely compared cards.) The 4750 isn't even out yet and considering how close the 4770 is to the HD4830, I would imagine that when it does come out, it's not better than the 8800GTX EDIT:Oh and you're missing the HD4350 and HD4550. They're generally slower than the 9500GT it seems. (but usually faster than the 9400GT) 4550 reviews http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/HD_4550_passive http://www.guru3d.com/article/ati-ra...-512mb-review/ http://www.legitreviews.com/article/801/ http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=15658 Mixed http://www.motherboards.org/reviews/...re/1824_9.html http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3420

Yep thanks for info. Fixed! If something is missing or there is an error let me know.

 

[Anth0789]

Quote:

Originally Posted by TF876 HD 4650 needs to be on there, its above the 8600gts but below the 9600GSO, I think it would probably be faster than the 256mb version of the 3850. so just above i guess. Also I think the 4670 seems to be a little high. http://www.techspot.com/article/125-...nce/page4.html and http://www.techspot.com/review/134-b...dup/page3.html Also this website is awesome for comparing graphics cards for COD5, Fallout3 and Far Cry 2

Good stuff thanks I updated it.

 

[Anth0789]

Quote:

Originally Posted by gerikoh 4850x2 is faster than 285 and 4890. gtx275 is faster than gtx280. 3870 is faster than a 9600gt, 2900xt is faster than both cards. i'm too busy at school to search for the links atm. but post the links sometime soon.

Imo the 4890 still outperforms the 4850X2.

 

[Anth0789]

Quote:

Originally Posted by sLowEnd What makes you so sure? It doesnt.

The 2GB version does...

 

[Anth0789]

Updated!!! So the GTS 250 1GB goes under GTX 260 Core 216 then?
http://www.overclockersclub.com/revi...s250_oc/13.htm

 

[Anth0789]

Hmm so is there any updates needed to be added or so on?

 

[Anth0789]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conley Put in the other thread since this one is apperently the dead one.

What its not dead there is no updated lately.

 

[Anth0789]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Narm hi ! Just a litlle mistake : the Voodoo4 4500 is better than the Voodoo3 3000. The VSA100 core is 20% better than Avenger core at the same clock so it is more : Voodoo3 3000<Voodoo3 3500< Voodoo4 4500

Okay fixed!

 

[Anth0789]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Afromee Am i mistaken or is this contradicting the 4th list which is also being updated daily ? How are we suppose to even remotely agree with 2 deferent lists ?

Well first off the 4th list was not being updated for a while so I asked some people if I should start my own thread and they said "Yes" but now he came back. He can have his thread back if he wants, really I don't care since I have other things to do anyway.

 

[Anth0789]

Quote:

Originally Posted by ItsTopher I'm just wondering what information this list is created from? And, no 4890 quadfire ...

Is there a 4890 Quadfire? If so ill add it.

 

[Anth0789]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mason92 Not sure but im guessing that 3x9800GTX+ In tri is faster than 8800Ultra in tri

Alright fixed.

 

[Anth0789]

Did a little update now there is a list for both ATI and Nvidia by order.

 

[Anth0789]

Quote:

Originally Posted by sLowEnd Why is the Geforce 7600GT 256MB above the Geforce 8600GT 256MB and the Geforce 7600GTS 256MB?

Fixed that. You never heard of 7600GTS:
http://www.motherboards.org/reviews/...re/1665_1.html

 

[Anth0789]

Little update I added the HD4730.

 

[Anth0789]

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSandman actully your dead wrong on placement on sevral levels, 8600GT even on launch drivers best the 7900GS, and the 8600GTS bested the 7950GT. the 7300GT should be lower, it was a tie with the 6600GT, unless your talking the DDR3 card then it was higher than the 7600GS. the X800GTO2 was a saphire card with 16pp, and would be placed higher than the x800/x850pro.

Okay got that fixed.

 

[Anth0789]

Fixed...

 

[Anth0789]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conley Why is the HD 4850X2 in front of the GTX 285, GTX 275, and HD 4890? Also, why are the 2GB variants rated higher? They only offer higher performance if you have super high res or lots of AA. Just use one variant of a card, otherwise you'll end up factoring all kinds of specifics in. EDIT: And GTX 275 SLi/Tri SLi should be ahead of GTX 280 SLi/Tri SLi

The 4850X2 1GB is around equal to the GTX 285 and does not beat the 4890 but the 4850X2 2Gb version does.

And for the GTX 275 and GTX 280 they around the same performance so its hard to judge whether which on is on top.