Overclock.net banner
1121 - 1140 of 1165 Posts

·
Initializing...
Joined
·
24,062 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1,122 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by ExoticallyPure View Post

Titan V on top
Done added!
 

·
1689 Federalist
Joined
·
11,710 Posts
Still use this thread as a reference.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
24 Posts
Add nVidia Titan RTX, it should be on top of the list.
 

·
Initializing...
Joined
·
24,062 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1,132 ·
Sorry guys but I can't seem to update as I used to but since I'm busy with other things but for some reason I can't edit this thread anymore sadly.
 
  • Rep+
Reactions: Redwoodz

·
Lister
Joined
·
13,474 Posts
Sorry guys but I can't seem to update as I used to but since I'm busy with other things but for some reason I can't edit this thread anymore sadly.

It's a security feature to stop hot heads leaving in anger from deleting threads. Contact ENTERPRISE telling him of your need to be able to regularly edit the first post and he will have that editing ability restored.
 

·
Initializing...
Joined
·
24,062 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1,134 ·
Updated the list, If I missed something let me know thanks!
 

·
Initializing...
Joined
·
24,062 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1,136 ·
Will you be adding the RTX Super line to the list?
I didn't notice that there was Super line.

Ill add them up now.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
353 Posts
Ok, let's see.

1. HD 7970 GHz is the same thing as R9 280X, so they should be on par. That's a fact.

2. According to hardware unboxed this year's made benchmark, GeForce GTX 980 Ti = GTX 1070 = GTX 1660 Ti:


All of them should be on the same level, and all should be above R9 Fury X. In fact, GTX 1660 Ti seems to be the weakest, but it will catch up in 2020, so, that's a fact.

3. GTX 690 - a 2 GB frame buffer card would suffer tremendously these days. But i can not be sure, there are no comparative benchmarks to test GTX 690 vs. modern cards, every benchmark that i find in 2019 only reviews the card itself, with nothing else to compare, so perhaps i will have to check this myself in the future.

4. RX 580 has become way more potent in the last two years. It now constantly beats GTX 1060 6 GB. Two years ago they were equal, now RX 580 8 GB should be just below RX 590.

5. RX 480 8 GB = RX 570 8 GB = GTX 980 = GTX 1060 6 GB, but this is debatable.

6. RX 470 8 GB = RX 570 4 GB = R9 390X = R9 290X 8 GB (yes, there is an R9 290X with 8 GB VRAM)

7. RX 470 4 GB = GTX 780 Ti = R9 290X = GTX 970 = R9 390

8. GTX 1650 is 10 % slower than GTX 1060 3 GB, but still, that's definitely enough to put it above GTX 780 3 GB, but perhaps below GTX 780 6 GB. Questionable though...


Basically what i am trying to say is AMD has moved forward since 2017, I am basing these observations on gamer's nexus and hardware unboxed benchmarks.

I've noticed that GTX 1080 Ti is now below RTX 2070 Super? What latest tests prove this?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,750 Posts
When the 7900 GTX was released, it had stability issues from the vRam running to fast. The original batches saw very high RMA's and finally Nvidia admitted to using inferior vRam IC's. There was a "recall" and the later batches of the 7900 GTX used a faster Samsung IC for the vRAm. These recalled 7900 GTX's were re-branded as the GTO and resold at a lower price point.

These should be swapped (or just remove the GTO):

224: GeForce 7900GTO 512MB
225: GeForce 7800GTX 512MB
 
1121 - 1140 of 1165 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top