before you know it any normal user will hit those with stock scores -_-
He's done it again 23000 3dmark06
1 - 20 of 21 Posts
Quote:
Yea, really! That test sure is a rapist!
Originally Posted by Syrillian  Wow! Kinda funny to me: Even with that amazing score, Red Valley was still < 4 fps |
This is one month old
![]()
pretty cool setup though, and easy to do... all he has to do is fill those copper pipe with liquid nitrogen and bingo... 23k in 3dmark06
Still he'd probably only get like 4000 in 3dmark07... and i'd be getting single digits
![]()
Still he'd probably only get like 4000 in 3dmark07... and i'd be getting single digits
Quote:
He's running with a X6800
![]()
Originally Posted by Cheetos316 wow..... and he says that those scores are from the gpu's at 70%??? Is the Kentsfield bottlenecking this operation? Always new a 4.8ghz Kentsfield is really slow..... |
2
Quote:
AFAIK he is actually running the QX6700. Here is the system configuration via Orb. Note the 1/4 cores.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=719731
Anyways, I would say those scores are all but unreachable for the X6800.
Originally Posted by gonX He's running with a X6800
|
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=719731
Anyways, I would say those scores are all but unreachable for the X6800.
2
1 - 20 of 21 Posts
