Overclock.net banner
1 - 20 of 20 Posts

· Premium Member
Joined
·
15,303 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Well, I found out last weekend what my highest possible overclock is on my 3700, 2.95 with 1.65 vcore. Specs to follow:
2-2-2-5 Timings, I can do CAS 1.5, but apparently there's a performance hit associated with 1.5?
Vcore 1.65, Vdimm 3.5, Vchipset 1.6, LDT 1.2.

I'm able to do 3.0 ghz, 300*10, but it's not stable. I started to bump up the vcore, and in OCCT, I noticed that as vcore increased, the test failed closer to finishing, so I concluded that as I juiced it up more, stability did increase, but I was running 1.75 vcore before I backed off at 295*10 at 1.65 vcore, where I'm comfortable. Is there another route I should take besides trying to juice it up, or is this the limit of the chip?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
33 Posts
Loosen those timings for higher O/C I can reach DDR600 levels with my tccd on 2.8v and 3,4,4,8 1t remember to lower the LDT x3 recommended also I can go higher than DDR600 if I change my 1t to 2t and use a divider...

Still a nice O/C though for those tight of timings....
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
15,303 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
I'm certain that it's my CPU because my RAM will run up to 260 mhz at 1.5-2-2-5, and I'm on a divider which slows it down to 245.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
15,303 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
I dunno, there are different steppings that might overclock better than others, yours was a good one probably.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
15,303 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
Okay, I'm gonna have a lot of time tonight to fiddle with settings. I'm going to find the max HTT that my motherboard is able to handle, and I'll report back.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
15,303 Posts
Discussion Starter · #13 ·
Max HTT is 380...

Anyway, couldn't do it, no matter what combination I tried. Tomorrow, I'm going to try 328*9 with a 166 divider in an attempt to bring my RAM up to its max speed.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
15,625 Posts
Quote:


Originally Posted by tytlyf

why you using the x9 multi? Keep it with 11 or 10, not worth the 9. It's too bad it wont go any higher, I bet it could if you had cooler temps on the chip you could have a little room to play.

If you were entered into a blind study, I guarantee you wouldn't see any difference with 100 mhz.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
355 Posts
What are you idle and full load temps? You may need better cooling to break the 3.0ghz mark. If you're on air, a 1.65Vcore, may be pushing your temps a little high. I'm surprised noone has pointed this out yet...
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
15,625 Posts
Quote:


Originally Posted by tytlyf

the hell are you talking about?


I was talking about your comment when you said it's too bad he couldn't get to 3 ghz yet. I'm just saying that you wouldn't notice any difference in performance,that's all. To be honest, I've used my system on stock settings before and didn't even realize it until I opened PCWizard up. I know I've done it at least twice.
 
1 - 20 of 20 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top