Overclock.net banner

I ocerclocked my 8450 to 3.08!!!!!!!!

4146 Views 54 Replies 32 Participants Last post by  ljason8eg
I will put up screen shots of this. Im currently at work right now. But I did 8450 2.1 to 3.08!!!!! with a gigabyte board am2+. ht freq at 1.4 ram at 790 mhz and multi at 10.5. fsb at 293 anything after that i fall into a hole of darkness. But i will settle at 3.08. Post any thoughts or questions!!!
1 - 20 of 55 Posts
Nice OC. CPU-Z validation pl0x?

Have you stress tested at all? What are your temps?
Yes, so far it is stable I play crysis on high settings for a couple of hours now. I also burned a cd while playing it. No shut downs yet. I will post my validation in cpu-z when i get home tonight.
So far my temps are at 40c idle and 55 on load. I got my cpu voltage at 1.25
ChrisB17 I will run prime too tonight when i get home. So far so good!!!
I'll be more impressed when it's stress-tested and stable. =) Good luck bro!
i doubt it'll be stress stable at 1.25v..but good OC nonetheless, so GL to you.
I understand the use of stress-tests less and less...if it works well for extended periods of time under the most stressful situations you put it through...isn't it stable?
I've only been able to get my 9600 up to 2.8GHz, and that was only stable long enough get cpu-z validated.
Quote:


Originally Posted by timw4mail
View Post

I understand the use of stress-tests less and less...if it works well for extended periods of time under the most stressful situations you put it through...isn't it stable?

It's definitely not a perfect system, but it's more or less a standard way of comparing stability. Someone might claim some outrageous overclocks and say it's "stable" on his system...but for all we know, that person might be doing word processing and Web browsing. Meanwhile, if anyone were to run a heavy app or game on that exact system, it might crash quickly.

If there's no way of standardizing stability (more or less), it'd be hard for people to know what to expect from their own overclocking. They might think something is wrong with their components, not knowing that someone else's definition of stable is way different.

**
BTW, I'm not saying this is the case for this guy...he tested with Crysis for hours...but just in general.
See less See more
Quote:


Originally Posted by timw4mail
View Post

I understand the use of stress-tests less and less...if it works well for extended periods of time under the most stressful situations you put it through...isn't it stable?

yea if he plays games and other stuff without crashing it is stable if you ask me
See less See more
As far as your OC that's outstanding, you're running up there with the 9950s, I hope that prime95 works out for you.

@ skugpezz I believe running something that can get all cores at 100% load for a minimum of 12 hours would be sufficient. You are gonna hit your high temps per core within that period, and without any core failures you know the system is stable to pretty much do anything you want with it. Thus, you have far less crashes on a system that is Prime95 "stable." I can boot @ 3.45 with my 9950 but have had troubles with prime95 stable anything over 3.107 @ 1.325 V.

Yes I can play games and surf the web @ higher clocks but don't feel comfortable unless it is prime95 stable.
  • Rep+
Reactions: 1
The problem of not stress testing is that a crash is more likely to happen then if you were so stress test it. It would be like a car manufacturer selling a car off the assembly line without a thorough inspection, sure it might run OK now, but you could lose power stearing a few months down the road and crash (or in the case of a PC, writing a term paper).

Plus stress testing puts everyones OCs on the same level. It helps set a standard which is universal for everyone to follow. I know with my system Prime 95 stable, I havent had a crash or BSOD since Nov of last year. That isnt to say I havent had the, "program has stopped responding" message (mostly with IE7) every now and again...
Quote:


Originally Posted by nakoni47
View Post

As far as your OC that's outstanding, you're running up there with the 9950s, I hope that prime95 works out for you.

@ skugpezz I believe running something that can get all cores at 100% load for a minimum of 12 hours would be sufficient. You are gonna hit your high temps per core within that period, and without any core failures you know the system is stable to pretty much do anything you want with it. Thus, you have far less crashes on a system that is Prime95 "stable." I can boot @ 3.45 with my 9950 but have had troubles with prime95 stable anything over 3.107 @ 1.325 V.

Yes I can play games and surf the web @ higher clocks but don't feel comfortable unless it is prime95 stable.

12hrs is overkill for stress testing, and you'll likely hit your max temps within 10min (unless your cooler isn't rated high enough for your TDP). I'm happy running 3DMark06/Vantage and playing some games to make sure my OC is stable. After all, if I can play games, nothing else really matters.
See less See more
Quote:


Originally Posted by FallenFaux
View Post

12hrs is overkill for stress testing, and you'll likely hit your max temps within 10min (unless your cooler isn't rated high enough for your TDP). I'm happy running 3DMark06/Vantage and playing some games to make sure my OC is stable. After all, if I can play games, nothing else really matters.

But it still isnt good OCing practice, you should stress test your OC to make sure it is stable. Prime95 isnt used to bring the temps up, it is used to stress the system to check for flaws.
See less See more
yeah ericeod has a number of good points here. I have three OCed systems here, and I regularly stress test each one. The initial test during step-to-step OCing is for about 15 min per step, and then when I am satisified and can call it quits, I do a final 18-hour stress test.

Some people would even call that cheap, as a number of people would only consider 24 hour tests, while others feel 8 is OK. I had an OC fail after 11 hours of intense Orthos blending. While I might not run it 24/7 at %100 load, there is always that chance that it could get unstable at any moment, even if not necessarily fully loaded.

Final point, ask anyone in the community, ask any major manufacturer.. you do NOT call something 'ready for use' before extensive testing. To disagree with this point will clearly define what inexperienced n00b really is.
See less See more
to be honest, i really hate stressing my comp
, i game for hours, using my comp for 2 months 24/7 straight, no probs, then i got some rendering project from a friend o mine.. boom, restarted itself when render using 3dsmax, i tried for second time, again restarted.. well, i'm not comfy with it.. i tweaked a bit, decided to run prime blend and smallfft for 4 hours each.. done.. run smoothly, now i can do anything, gaming, encoding, rendering,.. i feel so comfy


flo
See less See more
2
  • Rep+
Reactions: 1
1 - 20 of 55 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top