Overclock.net banner

1 - 20 of 37 Posts

·
Man with Fans
Joined
·
7,746 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Will the following setup run most modern games well?

i3 2100
Asrock U3S3
HD6850

1600x900 res. monitor
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,868 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by anubis1127;15337550
Yeah, at that point you might as well go for a 2500k though.
Couldn't agree more. At that price point there really isn't no reason to fork out that extra little bit of cash for the better chip.
 

·
Man with Fans
Joined
·
7,746 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
BF3 High/Medium @ 1600x900.

User not going to OC.

Recommendations for CPU and GPU please.

Will be using a P8P67/H67/Z68 mATX board.

GPU should be ATI only.
 

·
Watercooled Railgun
Joined
·
4,634 Posts
To everyone saying you need a "true" quad, not true. it might help, but not as much as you might think. Check my i3 vs i7's comparisons on my sig. My rig can run BF3 no issues with less GPU power. i3's are more than enough for gaming in single-card situations.

I do recommend you to get a H67 mobo tho. You'd be wasting the true potential of a P67/Z68 mobo as the i3 cannot be overclocked, plus it'll come cheaper.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
32,931 Posts
i3 is dual core with HT. So windows and programs will still see it as a quad core.

Honestly, the CPU is fine. The GPU is what's going to be holding back your gaming performance. That i3 2100 will do fine with any GPU setup you could want (within reason, obviously no tri SLI / tri fire high end cards).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
104 Posts
my i3-540 at stock speed bottlenecked my 6850 in bf3 so i had to oc it for the bottleneck move back to gpu.

take this in mind if you're not going to oc.
 

·
How many volts!?
Joined
·
3,430 Posts
Should work well. However if your kicking around the idea of a 2300/2400 i5, do yourself a favor and go ahead and get a 2500k. You'll have the future proof CPU and you'll have room to grow in terms of GPU upgrades.

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
 

·
Man with Fans
Joined
·
7,746 Posts
Discussion Starter · #16 ·
It's not a rig for me.
A customer wants it, and those are his specific instructions.
BF3 Medium to High, and at this resolution.

Will the i3 2100 and HD6850 handle this, or will I have to upgrade him to the i5 2400?

He wanted the HD6790 but I stopped him saying it wasn't something worth getting; get a HD6850 instead.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
9,896 Posts
Quote:


Originally Posted by Volvo
View Post

It's not a rig for me.
A customer wants it, and those are his specific instructions.
BF3 Medium to High, and at this resolution.

Will the i3 2100 and HD6850 handle this, or will I have to upgrade him to the i5 2400?

He wanted the HD6790 but I stopped him saying it wasn't something worth getting; get a HD6850 instead.

I think the i3 2100 + hd6850 should be OK for 1600x900 res. I still prefer the i3 5x0 chip over the i3 2100, they are both 32nm, and low power, but I like the OC ability of the i3 5x0 chip. I'm going to be doing another i3 5x0 comparison this week, comparing my i3 530 chip vs my i5 2500k with both a midrange(gtx470), and high end GPU (gtx580). BF3 will be one of the games tested eventually after it drops next week.
 

·
Watercooled Railgun
Joined
·
4,634 Posts
My rig can play BF3 on medium-high @ 1080p. A 6850 beats my 450 SLI, so it should be able to.
 
1 - 20 of 37 Posts
Top