Well that was quick
[IGN] Crytek Announces CryENGINE 3
- Status
1 - 20 of 211 Posts
Hopefully it'll be more efficient than CryEngine2
![]()
.
Quote:
Quote:
im sorry?
Originally Posted by killerhz  huh? |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Havegooda Wait wat? ~Gooda~ |
2
Quote:
the key to DX11 IS to use DX10 after all... they may implement it later, depending on the time it takes to develop the engine i think... to early to really say anything for sure, they just announced it. just my 2ct.
Originally Posted by DuckieHo No DX11? |
Quote:
Quote:
i assume that means DX11.
well i hope, for their sake, that CE3 is simpler than CE2 in the sense that it works and wont just bog down the system.
Originally Posted by DuckieHo No DX11? |
Quote:
| DX9/ DX10 and Next-Gen-Ready to be premiered at GDC 2009. |
well i hope, for their sake, that CE3 is simpler than CE2 in the sense that it works and wont just bog down the system.
Quote:
I believe DX11 specs are out? It is much easier to develop using the final specs then try to implement addition features later.
Originally Posted by ChielScape the key to DX11 IS to use DX10 after all... they may implement it later, depending on the time it takes to develop the engine i think... to early to really say anything for sure, they just announced it. just my 2ct. |
Quote:
It was made for consoles and then ported to PC, so obviously no DX11. The graphics will actually be worse than Cryengine 2, as there is no chance in hell Cryengine 2 would come remotely close to running above 5fps on a console.
Originally Posted by DuckieHo No DX11? |
Quote:
CE2 was very efficient. crysis had so much going on that your poor little e4300 couldn't cope with it though...
Originally Posted by Admiral Mudkipz Hopefully it'll be more efficient than CryEngine2
|
2
Does it support ray-Tracing? and this is soo going to rape our GPU
![]()
...
1 - 20 of 211 Posts
- Status
