the ball and maze game on my android has this

http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/news/comments/researchers-use-ipad-2-camera-to-create-glasses-free-3d-effectA group of French researchers has created a proof-of-concept app and video that demonstrates the iPad 2's ability to create glasses-free 3D effects. Jeremie Francone and Laurence Nigay of the Laboratory of Informatics of Grenoble, EHCI Research Group discovered that by using the device's front-facing camera to track the head of the user-and therefore determine the angle from which the user is looking at the device-they could create a spatially-aware display. Notably, the effect does not use the device's accelerometer, and instead relies solely on the front camera.
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/04/13/researchers-give-the-ipad-display-some-depth/?ref=technologyThe technique could be applied to a new type of interactive game, like a first-person shooter where bullets fly in the direction of the player.
That's the first thing I thought of, too. It seems to be the same demo.Originally Posted by Lime;13119269
Reminds me of the Wii headtracking from so long ago.
you're talking about this one.Originally Posted by aroc91;13119366
That's the first thing I thought of, too. It seems to be the same demo.
This requires glasses mounted infrared, and IMO doesn't look any better than the iPad's version, though the screen is larger.Originally Posted by PRloaded;13119430
you're talking about this one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd3-eiid-Uw
Way better implemented than the iPad demo.
If you're seeing a different image with both eyes, it's still not 'really' 3D. It's still just perception. An effect. To be truly 3D, it needs to have a real 3rd dimension. Impossible on a flat surface.Originally Posted by Coma;13122628
It's not really 3D... it just changes based on your perspective. You still see the same image with both eyes.
already been posted above you, but if you note - that requires headtracking of the wiimote using infrared. This doesn't which is what makes it cool - it's just the camera.Originally Posted by Viridian;13123678
This was done years ago using a customised Wii. Nothing new.
http://uk.gizmodo.com/#!337068/wii-headtracking-creates-3d-window-display
Sigh... it's a display, of course it's all about the "effect". That being said, your eyes are just sensors, it's possible to provide them with information that is identical to the information they would receive when looking at a 3d scene. Stereoscopic 3d attempts to do this, this "3d" effect does not. It's simulated perspective, nothing more.Originally Posted by damian5000;13123319
If you're seeing a different image with both eyes, it's still not 'really' 3D. It's still just perception. An effect. To be truly 3D, it needs to have a real 3rd dimension. Impossible on a flat surface.
Sighing out loud.Originally Posted by Varjo;13129993
Sigh... it's a display, of course it's all about the "effect". That being said, your eyes are just sensors, it's possible to provide them with information that is identical to the information they would receive when looking at a 3d scene. Stereoscopic 3d attempts to do this, this "3d" effect does not. It's simulated perspective, nothing more.