Overclock.net banner

Faster Processor?

  • Intel Core i7 980x

    Votes: 101 71.1%
  • Intel Core i7 2600k

    Votes: 41 28.9%

  • Total voters
    142
1 - 20 of 34 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
547 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I read this article here:<br><br><a class="bbcode_url" href="http://www.kitguru.net/components/cpu/zardon/can-the-intel-core-i7-2600k-5-1ghz-slay-its-980x-goliath/" target="_blank">http://www.kitguru.net/components/cpu/zardon/can-the-intel-core-i7-2600k-5-1ghz-slay-its-980x-goliath/</a><br><br>
Saw the conclusion.. "Compared to the fastest desktop processor in the world, at stock speed, the 2600k is almost 30% behind. Using KitGuru’s building skills, we cranked the voltage to 1.6, rolled the clocks up to a steady 5.1Ghz and watched it breeze past the Extreme Edition by more than 10%."<br><br>
What do you guys think is the fastest processor overall?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
828 Posts
<div class="quote-container"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>Electric;11882422</strong> <br>
I read this article here:<br><br><a class="bbcode_url" href="http://www.kitguru.net/components/cpu/zardon/can-the-intel-core-i7-2600k-5-1ghz-slay-its-980x-goliath/" target="_blank">http://www.kitguru.net/components/cpu/zardon/can-the-intel-core-i7-2600k-5-1ghz-slay-its-980x-goliath/</a><br><br>
Saw the conclusion.. "Compared to the fastest desktop processor in the world, at stock speed, the 2600k is almost 30% behind. Using KitGuru’s building skills, we cranked the voltage to 1.6, rolled the clocks up to a steady 5.1Ghz and watched it breeze past the Extreme Edition by more than 10%."<br><br>
What do you guys think is the fastest processor overall?</div>
</div>
<br>
They arent running it like most normal overclockers would. I doubt many people would run it at 1.6v for every day overclock. It looks to be a great CPU though. I just wish they would run it with normal OC voltage.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
373 Posts
The 980x has 6 cores which makes it a better processor all things considered. Clock for clock the difference narrows quite a bit. If you are factoring cost then the 2600K is a better processor IMO. If you have a 1366 board I would go with the 980x, if you are starting from scratch then no question 2600k.
 

·
Not New to Overclock.net
Joined
·
1,887 Posts
What a lousy test...let's test processors at stock, then lets overclock one and compare it to the stock of the other...<br><br>
Even Intel is not dumb enough to put out a budget chip that can compete with it's top end chips. Clock for clock the hexa-cores will always thrash the SB chips.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,322 Posts
The 980x is an awsome processor!, but thats before you tell me the price,<br><br>
either way if the tooth fairy gave me $1000 id still buy a 2600k.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,944 Posts
Stupid poll. Overclock the 980x to 5.1ghz and watch what happens.<br><br>
[ame]<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wG5TAdvydw[/ame" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wG5TAdvydw[/ame</a>]<br><br>
EDIT: This video shows that a 4.5ghz 980x gets 11.50 points in Cinebench compared to the 9.86 points the 2600k gets at 5.1ghz. I think that answers your question OP.<br><br>
Whoever voted for the 2600k isn't very smart.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,975 Posts
Unfair comparisons? Who would run 1.6v on a 32nm chip 24/7 let alone on a 65nm Chip...<br><br>
980x easily wins at stock v stock.... Just imagine a 980x at 5ghz?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,944 Posts
It's silly to even compare a hexa core i7 vs a quad core i7 anyway. A more fair comparison would be the 980x vs. the upcoming LGA 2011 socket processors.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
44 Posts
<div class="quote-container"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>Pillz Here;11883025</strong> <br>
It's silly to even compare a hexa core i7 vs a quad core i7 anyway. A more fair comparison would be the 980x vs. the upcoming LGA 2011 socket processors.</div>
</div>
<br>
This... Although to be fair, the replacement for the i980 will be the 8 core ivy bridge so we may never really see true apples to apples<br><br>
To me these new parts are about bang for the buck more than outright perf gains over prior core i's. Sort of odd that the tech sites are crowing as if these parts are delivering transformational perf gains when they aren't. Perf per dollar definitely.<br><br>
When ivy bridge comes I'll certainly mothball my 980/1366, but I'm not chomping at the bit really based on SB.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
71 Posts
just like couple of guys said upthere, its not fair compare a quad core processor and a hexa core processor... im new at this overclocking world but what i know is the 980x takes the ***** out of the 2600 wish is very good and the performance is amazing compared to the prize!
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
9,168 Posts
<img alt="images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQbZqj5ngdzRET-NCTEHZEyI-3zkXa5UMxawvT_TzykcxIcVnK9Jg" class="bbcode_img" src="http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQbZqj5ngdzRET-NCTEHZEyI-3zkXa5UMxawvT_TzykcxIcVnK9Jg">
 

·
Initializing...
Joined
·
23,776 Posts
<a href="http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/287?vs=142&i=2.3.4.5.6.25.26.27.28.29.30.31.32.33.34.35.36.37.38.39.40.41.42.43.45.46.47.48.49.50.51.52.53.54.55.56.57.60.61.62.63.64" target="_blank">980x vs 2600k!</a>
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
83 Posts
why do you imagine 980x at 5 ghz<br />
<br />
it can't do that at daily usage while sb can do it<br />
<br />
also 980x is 1000 usd which makes it literally unbuyable <img src="/images/smilies/biggrin.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Big Grin" class="inlineimg" />
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,476 Posts
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="99%">
<tr>
<td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset">

<div>
Originally Posted by <strong>BallaTheFeared</strong>
<a href="showthread.php?s=18c9b6a381ea2c82787afc71db22dae8&p=12012878#post12012878" rel="nofollow"><img class="inlineimg" src="http://static.overclock.net//img/forum/go_quote.gif" border="0" alt="View Post" /></a>
</div>
<div style="font-style:italic"><img src="http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQbZqj5ngdzRET-NCTEHZEyI-3zkXa5UMxawvT_TzykcxIcVnK9Jg" border="0" alt="" onload="NcodeImageResizer.createOn(this);" /></div>

</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>Because a 1 week old thread is dead right? <img src="/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)" class="inlineimg" />
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,658 Posts
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="99%">
<tr>
<td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset">

<div>
Originally Posted by <strong>Pillz Here</strong>
<a href="showthread.php?s=18c9b6a381ea2c82787afc71db22dae8&p=11882940#post11882940" rel="nofollow"><img class="inlineimg" src="http://static.overclock.net//img/forum/go_quote.gif" border="0" alt="View Post" /></a>
</div>
<div style="font-style:italic">Stupid poll. Overclock the 980x to 5.1ghz and watch what happens.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wG5TAdvydw" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wG5TAdvydw</a><br />
<br />
EDIT: This video shows that a 4.5ghz 980x gets 11.50 points in Cinebench compared to the 9.86 points the 2600k gets at 5.1ghz. I think that answers your question OP.<br />
<br />
Whoever voted for the 2600k isn't very smart.</div>

</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>There's a video on you tube with a guy that ran his 980X at 4.9GHz and got 12.57 points in Cinebench 11.5.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
462 Posts
Well my 5ghz air cooled i7 2600k is faster in SuperP1 1m than an i7 980x at 5.3ghz water cooled<br />
<br />
#8 <a href="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/55790-official-superpi-1m-top-times.html#post592938" target="_blank">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarkin...tml#post592938</a><br />
<br />
Top 10 SuperPi 1M Times for INTEL Processors
 

·
 
Joined
·
12,971 Posts
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="99%">
<tr>
<td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset">

<div>
Originally Posted by <strong>DB006</strong>
<a href="showthread.php?s=18c9b6a381ea2c82787afc71db22dae8&p=12015326#post12015326" rel="nofollow"><img class="inlineimg" src="http://static.overclock.net//img/forum/go_quote.gif" border="0" alt="View Post" /></a>
</div>
<div style="font-style:italic">Well my 5ghz air cooled i7 2600k is faster in SuperP1 1m than an i7 980x at 5.3ghz water cooled<br />
<br />
#8 <a href="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/55790-official-superpi-1m-top-times.html#post592938" target="_blank">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarkin...tml#post592938</a><br />
<br />
Top 10 SuperPi 1M Times for INTEL Processors</div>

</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>Congratulations, I'm very impressed.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
371 Posts
It really depends on what things you will do with the processor... I think the 2600k is the better processor because of its price for performance, besides what programs do you know that use all 6 cores, let alone 4 cores besides benchmarking programs? The 2600k has better OC ability, better temperatures, and better price for performance. If I am going to pay 3 times as much for a 980x, I better get 3 times the performance.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,073 Posts
No choice here boys and girls gotta flame <br />
<br />
The fact that this thread even exists is an enbaresment to the site.<br />
<br />
980x will decimate this mainstreme platform everyday of the week and twice on Sundays <br />
<br />
This statment is not saying anything bad about SB. it simply is out of it's league.<br />
<br />
try this going quad to quad and it might even be readable <br />
<br />
<img src="/images/smilies/frown.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Frown" class="inlineimg" />
 
1 - 20 of 34 Posts
Top