Intel X25 - 3 months later
1 - 19 of 19 Posts
Joined
·
1,828 Posts
Nice!
I tossed all my pre-RAID single drive tests but I guess Intel's G1 pre-TRIM "clean and orderly" stuff is working just fine.
![]()
I tossed all my pre-RAID single drive tests but I guess Intel's G1 pre-TRIM "clean and orderly" stuff is working just fine.
Joined
·
1,828 Posts
Quote:
I generally don't keep folders, just drive images and I probably deleted that folder to make a smaller image and then deleted that image while cleaning my WHS storage.
AAR, I've always read that the G1 drives didn't need TRIM and your screenshots add validation.
Originally Posted by eflyguy  I was cleaning up my storage drive and found a folder with all my original HDTune benches (although they are also posted in the sticky at the top of this forum..) ..a |
AAR, I've always read that the G1 drives didn't need TRIM and your screenshots add validation.
Joined
·
1,828 Posts
Quote:
And you know his aren't?
Originally Posted by DuckieHo G1 need TRIM if heavily used. |
Joined
·
2,648 Posts
Three months usage would explain the whole thing. Non-trim speed degredation issues happen over a longer timeline. Update this thread in a year.
![]()
Joined
·
1,986 Posts
Quote:
This is correct. Before I updated my firmware on my Vertex's, I lost performance in the write tests not the read test.
Originally Posted by -n7- CrystalDiskMark. Read tests are a good way to show nothing. Writes are what degrades... |
Joined
·
1,828 Posts
I must be the lucky one....I lost both write and read!
![]()
Quote:
It's performance degrading due partially filled sectors... not corrupted sectors.
Also, there are absolutely bad sectors on your Samsung drive. It just internally remaps them to reserved space so you don't see them.
Originally Posted by Nautilus Wow SSDs degrade really fast. I have Samsung 60GB/7200rpm more than 6 years old and still chugs. No sign of bad sector or anything. |
Also, there are absolutely bad sectors on your Samsung drive. It just internally remaps them to reserved space so you don't see them.
Joined
·
9,229 Posts
Quote:
Where did you work that out from? His results show nothing as its the write performance that decreases, but using TRIM stops that from being much of a problem.
Originally Posted by Nautilus Wow SSDs degrade really fast. I have Samsung 60GB/7200rpm more than 6 years old and still chugs. No sign of bad sector or anything. |
Joined
·
3,934 Posts
Quote:
Oh, i misevaluated the benchmark comparisons then.
@Duckieho, I know SSDs have shorter life cycle than mechanical drives. I read it before. And my good ol Samsung drive, i run HD Tune bad sector test on it results were fine.
Originally Posted by Fusion Racing Where did you work that out from? His results show nothing as its the write performance that decreases, but using TRIM stops that from being much of a problem. |
@Duckieho, I know SSDs have shorter life cycle than mechanical drives. I read it before. And my good ol Samsung drive, i run HD Tune bad sector test on it results were fine.
Joined
·
4,503 Posts
Joined
·
3,186 Posts
Quote:
raid 0 doesn't support trim so it degrades faster. just your writing
Originally Posted by PeterWar So would you guys say that one x-25M Gen2 will eventually outperform two x-25M Gen2 Raid 0 due to degredation? (No trim support on RAID by Intel 
|
1 - 19 of 19 Posts
