Overclock.net banner

Is it stable?

580 Views 17 Replies 6 Participants Last post by  ChrisB17
I ran IBT and I ran 200 turns of it. And it failed on 99.99% (199 of 200)
Am I stable or not?
See less See more
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
No, you are not completely stable.

Will you be able to run everyday programs, probably without problems? Yes you will. However, in the future you'll probably end up getting random crashes as your CPU gets stressed. If I were you, I would try to tweak the voltages and see if you can pass 100%.
Damn. I hate bumping vcore.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Noctred View Post
ibt?
Intel Burn Test
See less See more
People are saying 20 rounds are stable. Screw this how long should I run prime for?
I always recommend at least 200 for stability.
If your computer will be on 24 hours a day, run prime for 24 hours.
So 24hours of prime - 200 IBT?
Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisB17 View Post
So 24hours of prime - 200 IBT?
lol no, 15IBT runs usually means 24 hr p95 stability, 20 is way past that. I know that when I tested my Q6600 overclock at 3.861 and it passed 60IBT runs that equalled to 33 hrs of P95 stability, before I shut of p95 out of boredom.

Out of curiosity where did your IBT fail, towards the end?

Quote:

Originally Posted by sav5716 View Post
I always recommend at least 200 for stability.
If your computer will be on 24 hours a day, run prime for 24 hours.
200 IBT?
General concesus is that's extreme level of stability and if your oc can pass that you should bump up the fsb a notch. IBT generally puts a lot more stress on the cpu vcore settings, if that or other cpu voltage settings are too low you'll know right away. P95 is good for determining if your northbridge voltage settings are correct, IBT isn't as good at pinging northbridge / memory voltage settings.
See less See more
2
Well both test different things and IBT definitely pushes harder. 200 runs of IBT shouldn't take you 24 hours but it will find errors if you have them. Prime95 doesn't do as good of a job finding errors as IBT does, that's why you need to run it for so long. Sometimes errors don't come up until hour 20+. 200 runs and 24 hours don't equal each other. They are just the standard that people, at least myself, recommend for the different levels of stress that the different programs put on the CPU. Personally I would run IBT before P95 but it is all preference. If 24 hours in P95 passes and that proves to you that it's stable, then it's stable. In reality, every program does something different so you're bound to have an error or two on another program unless your overclock is completely stable. /rambling

*Edit* I know 200 is extreme but I've seen several people recommend it and I have learned to do the same. If 200 is for extreme stability, then I apologize for the mix up, but it still helps to know your system is perfect. =]
See less See more
i have no idea why it just failed. I didn't get a BSOD or anything. Just the detection went on and said "Sorry your PC has failed linkpack testing"
Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisB17 View Post
i have no idea why it just failed. I didn't get a BSOD or anything. Just the detection went on and said "Sorry your PC has failed linkpack testing"
Thats nothing to worry about, try running 120 IBT runs, at maximum memory setting.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sav5716 View Post
Well both test different things and IBT definitely pushes harder. 200 runs of IBT shouldn't take you 24 hours but it will find errors if you have them. Prime95 doesn't do as good of a job finding errors as IBT does, that's why you need to run it for so long. Sometimes errors don't come up until hour 20+. 200 runs and 24 hours don't equal each other. They are just the standard that people, at least myself, recommend for the different levels of stress that the different programs put on the CPU. Personally I would run IBT before P95 but it is all preference. If 24 hours in P95 passes and that proves to you that it's stable, then it's stable. In reality, every program does something different so you're bound to have an error or two on another program unless your overclock is completely stable. /rambling

*Edit* I know 200 is extreme but I've seen several people recommend it and I have learned to do the same. If 200 is for extreme stability, then I apologize for the mix up, but it still helps to know your system is perfect. =]
lol, I usually run IBT first as well to test out fsb / voltage settings. From my personal experience I found it to be a lot faster and yet as accurate (as p95) method at figuring out best fsb / voltage / ram settings. Usually I do 20 IBT runs for initial settings test, then 40 and 60 to finalize everything up. The most I ever do is 120 but IMO thats supposedly insures your overclock to be near lifetime stable. After that I run p95 or dual p95s for 24hrs+ for final testing and settings validation. Over at xs, the person who started the original IBT thread, his system was 40+ hrs p95 stable yet locked up in just two IBT runs.
See less See more
2
I would say that you are stable.
Quote:

Originally Posted by DeadSkull View Post
Thats nothing big, try running 120 IBT runs, at maximum memory setting.
The 200 was with maximum memory. I can do 150 easily. 199 not so much. This is so damn confusing.
See less See more
Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisB17 View Post
The 200 was with maximum memory. I can do 150 easily. 199 not so much. This is so damn confusing.
If you can get away with 150 Runs at maximum memory all matching up your pc should be extremely stable. Unless your northbirdge volts are bit too low you should be able to run p95 non stop for a week. You can always do that too if your really worried about it.
See less See more
I want to game not wait a damn week for prime to detect a error lol.
To be honest 200 is overkill...stable for me is 8-12 hour prime95 stable, gaming and just using programs.
I know its overkill. But I like to be safe then sorry. Also what is better Prime95 or the new OCCT?
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top