In that case definitely timings you'll notice the difference in response. Make it easier on the imc as well.
MHz v. Timings? No clue which to go for
4
With my CPU I'm allowed between either 2:6 or 2:8 for the memory which sounds better?
a: 1270 MHz 6-6-6-18 1t
or b: 1690 MHz 7-8-7-20 1t
6-8-7-18 59 1t, an improvement over the last settings. Now only if I had a 2:10 multiplier
![]()
a: 1270 MHz 6-6-6-18 1t
or b: 1690 MHz 7-8-7-20 1t
6-8-7-18 59 1t, an improvement over the last settings. Now only if I had a 2:10 multiplier
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
Why don`t you just benchmark it with maxxmem or somthing.
I had some setting and i thought that there were better than before but the bench proved otherwise
![]()
I had some setting and i thought that there were better than before but the bench proved otherwise
Quote:
Good RAM, man~
Originally Posted by djsi38t It's all about speed.My ram at 2133 cas 9 beats any other configuration with lower timings. |
Quote:
Same here. Except I run Cas 8 at 2133.
Originally Posted by djsi38t It's all about speed.My ram at 2133 cas 9 beats any other configuration with lower timings. |
2
6-8-7-18 59 1t, an improvement over the last settings. Now only if I had a 2:10 multiplier
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
