Overclock.net banner

Minimum requirements for a home file server

7298 Views 13 Replies 10 Participants Last post by  shadowstrewn
4
Ok , I'm joining the army soon , and I'll be away from home 5/7 , I'll need a home file server. Why ? Because my PC downloads 24/7. And I want atleast 4TB or 5TB of room , to store all the files.

Now , I have an old Compaq P4 PC with 256MB RAM , a ( I think ) CD re-/writer. It also has an ' upgraded '
videocard for the days when this beast's stock videocard coulden't handle RollerCoaster Tycoon 3. Anyway , it has an ' upgraded ' nVidia GeForce FX5200 128MB GPU and a 220W Compaq PSU.

Will this all be enough ?

For the case , I'm looking for a large black case. With alot of ventilation and ofcourse alot of slots for HDD's. I prefer a case with at the front a full grill looking like the bottom part of this :



Or something like it. I'll make a paint drawing of my ideal case later on.


Thanks in advance.
See less See more
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
3
Ok I've drawn MY ideal server case :



Any good ?
Or does it look anyone familiar ? Which ( existing ) looks alot like ?

Nevermind my drawing skills.
See less See more
My buddy uses a Celeron 300mhz with two 1TB Seagates as a file server running Win2k.

You really don't need much.
The only thing you really should be worried about on a home file server is the amount of RAM. Get at LEAST 1-2GB in there. A dual core setup tends to work slightly better, but a single core will be more than enough as well. The biggest thing with a file server is the amount of RAM and HDD space.

EDIT:
My personal file server is a dual Pentium 3 machine with 1GB of ECC Registered SD RAM in it....just as a comparison. And it doesn't even hiccup at all.
Drop the video card. This will just draw power unnecessarily.

That 220w PSU can probably only handle maybe 6-8 hard drives total.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pioneerisloud View Post
The only thing you really should be worried about on a home file server is the amount of RAM. Get at LEAST 1-2GB in there. A dual core setup tends to work slightly better, but a single core will be more than enough as well. The biggest thing with a file server is the amount of RAM and HDD space.
256MB should be fine.... It depends more on what OS. If he's using XP/Vista, then 512MB-1GB would be recommended. Linux is fine on 256MB. Dual-core is never needed for a file server. Your HD and NICs are always the system bottleneck.
See less See more
Welcome to the armed forces! I'm U.S Navy, Active Duty, Submarine Service myself.
4
Quote:

Originally Posted by DuckieHo View Post
Drop the video card. This will just draw power unnecessarily.

That 220w PSU can probably only handle maybe 6-8 hard drives total.

256MB should be fine.... It depends more on what OS. If he's using XP/Vista, then 512MB-1GB would be recommended. Linux is fine on 256MB. Dual-core is never needed for a file server. Your HD and NICs are always the system bottleneck.
Duckie , I've read alot about Windows 2000. But I have a Windows XP Professional CD , can't I just install that on to the server ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEK3 View Post
Welcome to the armed forces! I'm U.S Navy, Active Duty, Submarine Service myself.
Uh , thanks.
You got any information on servers ?
See less See more
Quote:

Originally Posted by /Ben View Post
Duckie , I've read alot about Windows 2000. But I have a Windows XP Professional CD , can't I just install that on to the server ?
XP Pro has features to allow it to be set up as server... I don't know how off the top of my head though. If you're using XP, you might want to upgrade the RAM. Your other option is free Linux.
See less See more
3
Quote:

Originally Posted by /Ben View Post
Uh , thanks.
You got any information on servers ?

What sort of NIC does your system have? If it's mobo stock, you may want to look at the specs, and consider an upgrade if your router would have a higher rate.
See less See more
With my home file server its only got 512mb of ram and that's been more then enough, with Linux running on it, even when a gui was installed.
But I guess if your going to putting so much hard drive space in it, getting a gig or so of ram wont be a big deal.
I have 1.2 terabytes of storage (3 hard drives) running a P4 with XP Pro and 512mb of ram. Runs great.
Honestly a simple file server doesn't need to be any kind of beast. Get whatever dual-core processor is cheapest right now, I know the e4000 series were less than $100 recently and any of those should do just fine.
2.) Ram is so cheap right now you should go ahead and get 4gbs. You can get 2x2gb Corsair sticks for under $80.
3.)Storage. I recommend Seagate ES2 hdds to all my customers who want large amounts of data stored reliably. They do not cost significantly more than their regular desktop drives yet have double the MTBF rating.
Now of course I am assuming you are going to be using a RAID array, most likely RAID 5. Make sure you use a RAID controller card with dedicated hardware rather than relying on software RAID.
4.)I might also recommend going with slower rotational speed, power effecient, "green" drives. It'll save some power, some heat, and with the RAID you won't really notice much performance drop.
I'm turning my old HP a1209n into a server. 3.066Ghz Celeron D Single-Core processor. 512MB RAM, putting 1 TB into it when I get around to it. Single core is perfectly fine as long as it's only doing file transfering...
I use a RAID3 1TB on a PNY controller for storage. The card was only $39 when I bought it. I only have 5 X 250GB satas (4 X stripped 1 X parody) because i don't have enough money for 5 X 1TB drives. Just thinking about having 4TBs of secured data makes me salivate.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16816110002

The only bad part about the card is that because it's a PCI interface so you'll only get 96mb/s write and read out of the RAID3.
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top