Overclock.net banner

MSI GTX 1660 Super Gaming X

1104 5
Product Organism Font Screenshot Insect


Product Rectangle Font Software Screenshot


I set a UL record tonight, lol. Core +150, memory +600. Nice card.

It looked as though this was about the best option for matching up to a 7700K at 1080p without bottlenecking either way. There was also the 3050, but I couldn't get past it being gimped at x8, and this is just a spare midrange build mostly put together with parts left over from the ADL upgrades.

Edit: 1,000th post, woohoo...
1 - 6 of 6 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,240 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
What does it get for a timespy regular score at 1080p?
Rectangle Screenshot Font Software Operating system


I had to roll the core back to +140, +150 crashed on me twice in a row.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-7700K Processor,MSI Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78) (3dmark.com)

Here is a validated 1440p result, for comparison:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-7700K Processor,MSI Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78) (3dmark.com)

This one I think I had the core at +125.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
555 Posts
Ok. Not much farther behind 3060ti. I get 11600 on timespy regular with whatever settings the program is defaulted to. Card is also running stock speeds on core and mem.

edit I see some 3060ti getting 12000-12300 wonder if timespy easier to run a year ago? Ha maybe mine is poorer silicon.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,240 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
Strangest, most unexpected thing was the USB-C device that showed up in the device tree and needed a separate driver. Still trying to figure out what it's for -- I saw one Reddit post after some googling that stated you could connect a monitor to such a port on your motherboard if one was available, and there is one on this motherboard (MSI Z270 M5 Gaming), but probably something I'll never use. Just weird, though.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,389 Posts
Ok. Not much farther behind 3060ti. I get 11600 on timespy regular with whatever settings the program is defaulted to. Card is also running stock speeds on core and mem.

edit I see some 3060ti getting 12000-12300 wonder if timespy easier to run a year ago? Ha maybe mine is poorer silicon.
You need to check the second link. Your score for a 3060 ti is well within the norm.
 
  • Rep+
Reactions: tubs2x4
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
Top