Overclock.net banner

241 - 260 of 9961 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
360 Posts
<div class="quote-container" data-huddler-embed="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/210#post_26448053" data-huddler-embed-placeholder="false"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>ajc9988</strong> <a href="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/210#post_26448053"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif"></a><br><br>
The second link doesn't show anything related to your point. The first one does. But there is another factor there not considered, frequency of the CPU. Literally running 175MHz faster than my CPU, which would effect Memory read. Second, his other performance in benches is the direct same as mine scaled. My scores are roughly comparable to Chew's, give or take here or there. So, if the memory isn't fully translating into a massive change in benches that are memory sensitive, eh...<br><br>
Also, you are saying Chew's memory read is "just ok." Do you get your lack of understanding?<br><br>
<a href="http://www.overclock.net/t/1636550/amd-ryzen-threadripper-owners-club-1950x-1920x-1900x/2030#post_26418386">http://www.overclock.net/t/1636550/amd-ryzen-threadripper-owners-club-1950x-1920x-1900x/2030#post_26418386</a><br><br>
Maybe back up and try again, please.</div>
</div>
<br>
You are right. The second link messed up.<br>
But you did not answer if the score is UMA or NUMA based?<br>
Also using NUMA gives roughly +5% performance in games.<br>
Is yours a more gaming related rig oder for content creation?<br>
Because using Uniform Memory Access screws your latency.<br>
Could you provide a NUMA score?<br><br>
Just my opinion.<br><br>
Thanks.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
512 Posts
<div class="quote-container" data-huddler-embed="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/230#post_26448160" data-huddler-embed-placeholder="false"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>porschedrifter</strong> <a href="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/230#post_26448160"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif"></a><br><br>
Hey dudes!<br>
So what is everyone using to benchmark and compare their memory scores?<br>
I'm found an old (but latest) MaxxMem 2.04, which is old and no longer being developed which seems to work<br>
Oddly enough, my scores running 16-15-15-15-36-50 1t (with all other advanced timings on auto) have a tiny bit better performance than the Calc's suggested fast timings of 16-16-16-16 for the same speed of 2800<br><br>
If I go to 2966MHz for the timings I have to run to be stable, 3000 as well, the score is actually worse than the tighter timings. So I guess I'll keep with the lower speed and tighter timings.<br><br>
MaxxMem 2.04 (old but latest version I could find online is here 2.04)<br>
<a href="http://www.computerbild.de/download/MaxxMEM2-15080919.html" target="_blank">http://www.computerbild.de/download/MaxxMEM2-15080919.html</a><br><br>
So here are the results:<br>
16-15-15-15<br><a class="H-lightbox-open" href="http://www.overclock.net/content/type/61/id/3151459/"><img alt="" class="lightbox-enabled" data-id="3151459" data-type="61" src="http://www.overclock.net/content/type/61/id/3151459/width/500/height/1000/flags/LL" style="; width: 420px; height: 440px"></a><br><br>
And the Ryzen Dram Calc settings:<br><a class="H-lightbox-open" href="http://www.overclock.net/content/type/61/id/3151460/"><img alt="" class="lightbox-enabled" data-id="3151460" data-type="61" src="http://www.overclock.net/content/type/61/id/3151460/width/500/height/1000/flags/LL" style="; width: 420px; height: 440px"></a><br><br>
So my next question is, how can I figure out the advanced tweaked timings for running 16-15-15-15-36-50?<br>
Or even some suggestions to tweak just a few of the more crucial timings, otherwise I'll just settle for auto <img alt="biggrin.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/biggrin.gif"></div>
</div>
<br>
Use AIDA64 and SuperPi (especially SPi32M). That will give you a much better idea than MaxxMem at this point.<br><br>
Edit: You can also do CB and wprime to see to some degree, but these already have their own variances on variables. The above two will give a good idea.<br><br><div class="quote-container" data-huddler-embed="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/240#post_26448206" data-huddler-embed-placeholder="false"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>Esenel</strong> <a href="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/240#post_26448206"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif"></a><br><br>
You are right. The second link messed up.<br>
But you did not answer if the score is UMA or NUMA based?<br>
Also using NUMA gives roughly +5% performance in games.<br>
Is yours a more gaming related rig oder for content creation?<br>
Because using Uniform Memory Access screws your latency.<br>
Could you provide a NUMA score?<br><br>
Just my opinion.<br><br>
Thanks.</div>
</div>
<br>
It is UMA. I don't mess with NUMA and will not do a NUMA score (I must have missed that part when waking up). Multiple reviews show little actual performance gains while it does nothing for my workload (content creation as a hobby). If I was building a gaming rig, why would I come from a 6700K to a 1950X? Literally, my 4.8GHz daily driver on an AIO outperformed this beast in gaming (although now I have a custom loop, first built, but I mis-seated the block on the CPU (first time I seated it, it was perfect contact, but I had to remove it for some reason, I forget why atm, and evidently the second time, due to the posts being so tight on the fitting distance, I got it wrong, evidently), so am limited by temps at 4.05, even though I have an XSPC TR4 block, at least until I have the time to drain and reseat). In fact, I ignore ALL NUMA scores on this platform.<br><br>
But that does explain some of the confusion/disagreement between us, which is awesome. (please read the above as a direct statement, not as sass/snark/caddy). I am aware that UMA makes latency higher, but in actual performance, for the most part, it doesn't whereas NUMA can hurt performance in some things.
 

·
AMD overclocker/developer
Joined
·
1,651 Posts
Discussion Starter #243
<div class="quote-container" data-huddler-embed="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/220_20#post_26448088" data-huddler-embed-placeholder="false"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>ajc9988</strong> <a href="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/220_20#post_26448088"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif"></a><br><br>
Thank you for the more in depth explanation. Just having my first cup of coffee, so I'll need to review it again after fully awake.<br><br>
What I wrote was, in part, to help a person who could not find a boot solution and teaching them how to search for a boot solution (even you know that the timings generated from accurate calculations, which I will concede I do not have in what I wrote, can still wind up in a no boot situation and the person driving themselves crazy looking for one). But, I will need to take the accurate calculation information, then modify how to perform a search for something bootable at a given speed. (In other words, if a person is persistent to reach a certain speed, this is a way to achieve "finger in the sky" over nothing).<br><br>
With that said, I can only speak from my current level of knowledge on the topic, so I welcome being taught more and learning more on this topic. Once again, thank you. I do apologize if anything in this post gave offense, just waking up atm.</div>
</div>
<br><br>
everything is normal <img alt="smile.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/smile.gif"> not always accurate calculations give the result, some values have to be selected manually, as you described, this is a real example. These people are called overclockers <img alt="smile.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/smile.gif"><br><br>
the main thing is that in this thread nobody cursed
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
721 Posts
<div class="quote-container" data-huddler-embed="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/240_30#post_26448439" data-huddler-embed-placeholder="false"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>1usmus</strong> <a href="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/240_30#post_26448439"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif"></a><br><br>
the main thing is that in this thread nobody cursed</div>
</div>
<br>
... out loud [fixed it for you] <img alt="biggrin.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/biggrin.gif">
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
135 Posts

<span huddler_attributes="{"plugin":"attachment","params":{"id":"50698","name":"ryzenramtimings3200xmp.JPG","description":"How come it's recommending me timings worse than my DOCP profile (16-18-18-18)? ","size":263,"type":"JPG"}}" huddler_plugin="attachment">
<a
class="attachment HM-tool loginreq" href="/attachments/50698" title="How come it's recommending me timings worse than my DOCP profile (16-18-18-18)? "><span class="file JPG">ryzenramtimings3200xmp.JPG <span class="details">263k .JPG file</span></span>
</a></span><br><br>
How come it recommends me worse timings than the default DOCP profile (16-18-18-18)?
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
247 Posts
<div class="quote-container" data-huddler-embed="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/240#post_26449386" data-huddler-embed-placeholder="false"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>Xzow</strong> <a href="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/240#post_26449386"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif"></a><br><br>
<span huddler_attributes="{"plugin":"attachment","params":{"id":"50698","name":"ryzenramtimings3200xmp.JPG","description":"How come it's recommending me timings worse than my DOCP profile (16-18-18-18)? ","size":263,"type":"JPG"}}" huddler_plugin="attachment">
<a
class="attachment HM-tool loginreq" href="/attachments/50698" title="How come it's recommending me timings worse than my DOCP profile (16-18-18-18)? "><span class="file JPG">ryzenramtimings3200xmp.JPG <span class="details">263k .JPG file</span></span>
</a></span><br><br>
How come it recommends me worse timings than the default DOCP profile (16-18-18-18)?</div>
</div>
<br>
1st safe presets will always give you worse timmings as thats what they are-loose and safe timmings that can't possibly ever error check what fast timmings spit out and see what happens. 2nd, I might not have a general idea what hynix timmings look like in nanoseconds like I do sammy b but I can at least say your trfc vaule is utterly off and maybe your trc and tras but those could be right<br><br>
also embed the photo in the post and not as an attachment, this forum is nice in that it lets you not have to download every image to see it <img alt="smile.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/smile.gif">
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
129 Posts
Hi <a data-huddler-embed="href" href="/u/540936/1usmus">@1usmus</a>,<br><br>
I very grateful for your work and dedication to Overclock community and Ryzen users, especially RAM memory.<br>
I am roaming around Overclock forum in search of answers to my RAM issues and most elaborate answers are coming from U and few other guys.<br><br>
U did a great job regarding Calculator software. Concretizing spreadsheet values accumulated into one software <img alt="thumb.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/thumb.gif"><br>
Thank U for that... Also BIOS MODS...<br><br>
I almost sound as your groupie <img alt="biggrin.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/biggrin.gif"><br>
I wanted to say few words of praise in one place and I thought this thread was suitable <img alt="smile.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/smile.gif"><br><br>
Now I want to ask a few questions before I make some stupid move and make it worse, so please don't mind my ignorance.<br><br>
I am the owner of Asus Prime B350 Plus, Ryzen 1600 CPU with 3.8Mhz at 1.275V and Corsair LPX CMK16GX4M2B3200C16(R - red) v.5.39 Hynix chip - rank 1.<br>
I know this is not the good combination for CPU, MB and RAM, but at time of buying, this was not debated or mentioned anywhere as a problem. I have bought all in April, so I wasn't aware of that...<br><br>
3066 from Agesa 1.0.0.6 is good and stable. No errors - no issues. But I want little more, don't blame me... <img alt="smile.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/smile.gif"><br><br>
Because I have issues getting to 3200. I have tried all possible variations from the calculator, Stilt's MFR timings, other users timings, the voltage from 1.35 to 1.45, cad bus voltage, procODT, etc...<br>
Nothing is working as expected. Sometimes not even cold boot, sometimes BSOD before Windows, sometimes after 20% Memtest errors, sometimes random BSOD (Memory controller, Timing "something, something")... So I tried really almost everything from previous posts and other users comments.<br><br>
That said, now to real questions. I will try to make it short and concise as much as I can.<br><br>
1. Because B350 BIOS doesn't have VDDP voltage as an option, do U think that it will change anything and use your MOD for this motherboard?<br><br>
2. Do U need me to add my calculator screenshot timings and voltage here to show what I tried, to get a clearer image of what may be an issue?<br><br>
3. Do U think maybe PSU has to do with it something?<br><br>
This is for now...<br><br>
I am sorry for taking your time and please don't mind me be this extensive.<br><br>
Thank U in advance.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
60 Posts
New Bios for the Killer SLI X370 is out.<br><br>
But it does not work for me.<br>
Bios does not see v3.4 but it does see v3.2<br><br>
Tried global EU and China links, but none are seen <img alt="frown.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/frown.gif"><br><br>
And i/we waited so long
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
191 Posts
<div class="quote-container" data-huddler-embed="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/240#post_26449652" data-huddler-embed-placeholder="false"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>SexySale</strong> <a href="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/240#post_26449652"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif"></a><br><br>
Hi <a data-huddler-embed="href" href="/u/540936/1usmus">@1usmus</a>,<br><br>
I very grateful for your work and dedication to Overclock community and Ryzen users, especially RAM memory.<br>
I am roaming around Overclock forum in search of answers to my RAM issues and most elaborate answers are coming from U and few other guys.<br><br>
U did a great job regarding Calculator software. Concretizing spreadsheet values accumulated into one software <img alt="thumb.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/thumb.gif"><br>
Thank U for that... Also BIOS MODS...<br><br>
I almost sound as your groupie <img alt="biggrin.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/biggrin.gif"><br>
I wanted to say few words of praise in one place and I thought this thread was suitable <img alt="smile.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/smile.gif"><br><br>
Now I want to ask a few questions before I make some stupid move and make it worse, so please don't mind my ignorance.<br><br>
I am the owner of Asus Prime B350 Plus, Ryzen 1600 CPU with 3.8Mhz at 1.275V and Corsair LPX CMK16GX4M2B3200C16(R - red) v.5.39 Hynix chip - rank 1.<br>
I know this is not the good combination for CPU, MB and RAM, but at time of buying, this was not debated or mentioned anywhere as a problem. I have bought all in April, so I wasn't aware of that...<br><br>
3066 from Agesa 1.0.0.6 is good and stable. No errors - no issues. But I want little more, don't blame me... <img alt="smile.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/smile.gif"><br><br>
Because I have issues getting to 3200. I have tried all possible variations from the calculator, Stilt's MFR timings, other users timings, the voltage from 1.35 to 1.45, cad bus voltage, procODT, etc...<br>
Nothing is working as expected. Sometimes not even cold boot, sometimes BSOD before Windows, sometimes after 20% Memtest errors, sometimes random BSOD (Memory controller, Timing "something, something")... So I tried really almost everything from previous posts and other users comments.<br><br>
That said, now to real questions. I will try to make it short and concise as much as I can.<br><br>
1. Because B350 BIOS doesn't have VDDP voltage as an option, do U think that it will change anything and use your MOD for this motherboard?<br><br>
2. Do U need me to add my calculator screenshot timings and voltage here to show what I tried, to get a clearer image of what may be an issue?<br><br>
3. Do U think maybe PSU has to do with it something?<br><br>
This is for now...<br><br>
I am sorry for taking your time and please don't mind me be this extensive.<br><br>
Thank U in advance.</div>
</div>
<br>
there is hope<br><br>
maybe more so for you with later bios updates<br><br>
why ?<br><br>
i used a 1600 and that exact ram for a build but used an msi tomahawk board..and that automatically loaded xmp profile for ram which to this day has run stable at 3200 (were talking 6+ weeks now )<br><br>
my point ? if it can be done on agesa 1006 inside a msi bios ,then theres now real reason why not with a future asus bios<br>
(maybe msi bios team actually had that exact or very similar kit to hand when writing there bios .i dont know )<br>
but i was skeptical to the system owner who bought that ram that i would be able to get it to 3200 for him, but it just worked plug and play to BOTH our delights<br>
(in another similar cpu/board i managed to just click 2933 and it worked ....but this time it was with 2400 corsairs !!!) so the corsair isnt quite as awful as we have seen
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
191 Posts
<div class="quote-container" data-huddler-embed="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/240#post_26449788" data-huddler-embed-placeholder="false"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>CharlieWheelie</strong> <a href="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/240#post_26449788"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif"></a><br><br>
New Bios for the Killer SLI X370 is out.<br><br>
But it does not work for me.<br>
Bios does not see v3.4 but it does see v3.2<br><br>
Tried global EU and China links, but none are seen <img alt="frown.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/frown.gif"><br><br>
And i/we waited so long</div>
</div>
<br>
tried instant flash via bios + internet ?<br><br>
and what is so important about<br>
grey out instant flash with ftpm enabled ?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
129 Posts
<div class="quote-container" data-huddler-embed="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/240#post_26449800" data-huddler-embed-placeholder="false"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>datonyb</strong> <a href="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/240#post_26449800"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif"></a><br><br>
there is hope<br><br>
maybe more so for you with later bios updates<br><br>
why ?<br><br>
i used a 1600 and that exact ram for a build but used an msi tomahawk board..and that automatically loaded xmp profile for ram which to this day has run stable at 3200 (were talking 6+ weeks now )<br><br>
my point ? if it can be done on agesa 1006 inside a msi bios ,then theres now real reason why not with a future asus bios<br>
(maybe msi bios team actually had that exact or very similar kit to hand when writing there bios .i dont know )<br>
but i was skeptical to the system owner who bought that ram that i would be able to get it to 3200 for him, but it just worked plug and play to BOTH our delights<br>
(in another similar cpu/board i managed to just click 2933 and it worked ....but this time it was with 2400 corsairs !!!) so the corsair isnt quite as awful as we have seen</div>
</div>
<br>
Thank U <a data-huddler-embed="href" href="/u/552367/datonyb">@datonyb</a>,<br>
I had the similar issue regarding 2933 stuck for few months, but after one of the updates I got 3066 no problems, so U are right <img alt="smile.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/smile.gif"><br>
There is hope...<br><br>
Maybe wait for little more, but I wanted to ask experts before that, so I don't make a critical mistake and make it worse.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
60 Posts
No i have not tried over the net, think i will skip that tho.<br><br>
One thing i noticed in windows is that v3.2 is a Type 20 FILE and v3.4 is a Type 40 FILE.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
241 Posts
My CPU seems to be VDDSoC voltage hungry. <img alt="biggrin.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/biggrin.gif"><br><br>
Vcore 1.39v now testing with 3.925GHZ. VDDSoC 1.05v prime95 crashes my PC in about 5 minutes inside the first set of iteration. But raising VDDSoC to 1.1v allowed it to pass 3-4 iterations already, 15 minutes without crashing yet.<br><br>
But GOD my temps are a lot worse with kryonaut than with conductonaut :'(<br><br>
Have to see memory stability again now that I touched VDDSoC <img alt="frown.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/frown.gif"><br><br>
Edit yeah Got error just in 1 hr mark compared to crashing whole PC in 5 minutes with 1.05 vddsoc and now it's been longer stable (1.3hr) without errors yet in prime95 as I raised VDDSoC even more (to 1.12v)<br><br>
Does infinity fabric use VCore voltage or is infinity's voltage supplied by VDDSoC?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
135 Posts
<div class="quote-container" data-huddler-embed="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/200_100#post_26449457" data-huddler-embed-placeholder="false"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>LightningManGTS</strong> <a href="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/200_100#post_26449457"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif"></a><br><br>
1st safe presets will always give you worse timmings as thats what they are-loose and safe timmings that can't possibly ever error check what fast timmings spit out and see what happens. 2nd, I might not have a general idea what hynix timmings look like in nanoseconds like I do sammy b but I can at least say your trfc vaule is utterly off and maybe your trc and tras but those could be right<br><br>
also embed the photo in the post and not as an attachment, this forum is nice in that it lets you not have to download every image to see it <img alt="smile.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/smile.gif"></div>
</div>
<br>
The fast preset was very similar timings, 21/22 or so.
 

·
AMD overclocker/developer
Joined
·
1,651 Posts
Discussion Starter #256
<div class="quote-container" data-huddler-embed="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/240_20#post_26449652" data-huddler-embed-placeholder="false"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>SexySale</strong> <a href="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/240_20#post_26449652"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif"></a><br><br>
Hi <a data-huddler-embed="href" href="/u/540936/1usmus">@1usmus</a>,<br><br>
I very grateful for your work and dedication to Overclock community and Ryzen users, especially RAM memory.<br>
I am roaming around Overclock forum in search of answers to my RAM issues and most elaborate answers are coming from U and few other guys.<br><br>
U did a great job regarding Calculator software. Concretizing spreadsheet values accumulated into one software <img alt="thumb.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/thumb.gif"><br>
Thank U for that... Also BIOS MODS...<br><br>
I almost sound as your groupie <img alt="biggrin.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/biggrin.gif"><br>
I wanted to say few words of praise in one place and I thought this thread was suitable <img alt="smile.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/smile.gif"><br><br>
Now I want to ask a few questions before I make some stupid move and make it worse, so please don't mind my ignorance.<br><br>
I am the owner of Asus Prime B350 Plus, Ryzen 1600 CPU with 3.8Mhz at 1.275V and Corsair LPX CMK16GX4M2B3200C16(R - red) v.5.39 Hynix chip - rank 1.<br>
I know this is not the good combination for CPU, MB and RAM, but at time of buying, this was not debated or mentioned anywhere as a problem. I have bought all in April, so I wasn't aware of that...<br><br>
3066 from Agesa 1.0.0.6 is good and stable. No errors - no issues. But I want little more, don't blame me... <img alt="smile.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/smile.gif"><br><br>
Because I have issues getting to 3200. I have tried all possible variations from the calculator, Stilt's MFR timings, other users timings, the voltage from 1.35 to 1.45, cad bus voltage, procODT, etc...<br>
Nothing is working as expected. Sometimes not even cold boot, sometimes BSOD before Windows, sometimes after 20% Memtest errors, sometimes random BSOD (Memory controller, Timing "something, something")... So I tried really almost everything from previous posts and other users comments.<br><br>
That said, now to real questions. I will try to make it short and concise as much as I can.<br><br>
1. Because B350 BIOS doesn't have VDDP voltage as an option, do U think that it will change anything and use your MOD for this motherboard?<br><br>
2. Do U need me to add my calculator screenshot timings and voltage here to show what I tried, to get a clearer image of what may be an issue?<br><br>
3. Do U think maybe PSU has to do with it something?<br><br>
This is for now...<br><br>
I am sorry for taking your time and please don't mind me be this extensive.<br><br>
Thank U in advance.</div>
</div>
<br>
Hi!<br><br>
1. VDDP greatly affects the stability. In the modification of the bios, there are other useful things like CLDO_VDDP, it can help stabilize the system. If you have BSOD this is more of a problem with signal quality. Try it for 30 30 60 60 for CAD_BUS (or 20 20 30 30 if the signal quality is poor. This can be known when you check both values).<br><br>
2. RTС screenshot only needed<br><br>
3. The influence of the power unit is not excluded<br><div class="quote-container" data-huddler-embed="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/240_20#post_26449890" data-huddler-embed-placeholder="false"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>WarpenN1</strong> <a href="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/240_20#post_26449890"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif"></a><br><br>
My CPU seems to be VDDSoC voltage hungry. <img alt="biggrin.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/biggrin.gif"><br><br>
Vcore 1.39v now testing with 3.925GHZ. VDDSoC 1.05v prime95 crashes my PC in about 5 minutes inside the first set of iteration. But raising VDDSoC to 1.1v allowed it to pass 3-4 iterations already, 15 minutes without crashing yet.<br><br>
But GOD my temps are a lot worse with kryonaut than with conductonaut :'(<br><br>
Have to see memory stability again now that I touched VDDSoC <img alt="frown.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/frown.gif"><br><br>
Edit yeah Got error just in 1 hr mark compared to crashing whole PC in 5 minutes with 1.05 vddsoc and now it's been longer stable (1.3hr) without errors yet in prime95 as I raised VDDSoC even more (to 1.12v)<br><br>
Does infinity fabric use VCore voltage or is infinity's voltage supplied by VDDSoC?</div>
</div>
<br>
Lack of voltage for CPU can affect the voltage SOC.I advise you to try to increase the voltage on the processor by a step or two, and only then increase the voltage to SOC.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
129 Posts
<div class="quote-container" data-huddler-embed="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/250#post_26451609" data-huddler-embed-placeholder="false"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>1usmus</strong> <a href="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/250#post_26451609"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif"></a><br><br><br>
Hi!<br><br>
1. VDDP greatly affects the stability. In the modification of the bios, there are other useful things like CLDO_VDDP, it can help stabilize the system. If you have BSOD this is more of a problem with signal quality. Try it for 30 30 60 60 for CAD_BUS (or 20 20 30 30 if the signal quality is poor. This can be known when you check both values).<br><br>
2. RTС screenshot only needed<br><br>
3. The influence of the power unit is not excluded</div>
</div>
<br>
Thank U <a data-huddler-embed="href" href="/u/540936/1usmus">@1usmus</a> for the response.<br><br>
I will try this CAD_BUS suggestion from point 1, and give it a go. I have tried with 30 30 40 60 and 20 20 40 60 before, but, I will let U know.<br>
Thank U for your time...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
60 Posts
Well i used the online update for the Bios, and it worked.<br>
Strange how the Bios does not see it but does see the 3.2 version on my mem stick.<br><br>
And so far i see no difference at all. <img alt="frown.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/frown.gif"><br><br>
Will keep trying tho<br><br>
Have tried the settings for 2933Mhz and still i get the fans spinning up on reboot, how do i stop it doing this ?<br><br>
Otherwise seems ok with Cinebench but as i cant stop the fans spinning up at reboot i have not tried further testing.<br><br>
M Die Corsair 32GB 2x16GB LPX Vengence, so i may still be pushing my luck.<br><br>
I thought i would check my settings in Typhoon, just in case i got something wrong <img alt="smile.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/smile.gif"><br><br>
Now Typhoon was taking ages to read my memory, after 5 minutes i made a cup of tea.<br><br>
When i came back my PC had rebooted. Oh Buzzcocks<br><br>
Help, my main problem is not having enough time to really look at it.<br>
I should lock myself away for a day but i never get the time too.<br>
So very frustrating
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
129 Posts
<div class="quote-container" data-huddler-embed="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/250#post_26451609" data-huddler-embed-placeholder="false"><span>Quote:</span>
<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>1usmus</strong> <a href="/t/1640919/ryzen-dram-calculator-overclocking-dram/250#post_26451609"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif"></a><br><br><br>
Hi!<br><br>
1. VDDP greatly affects the stability. In the modification of the bios, there are other useful things like CLDO_VDDP, it can help stabilize the system. If you have BSOD this is more of a problem with signal quality. Try it for 30 30 60 60 for CAD_BUS (or 20 20 30 30 if the signal quality is poor. This can be known when you check both values).<br><br>
2. RTС screenshot only needed</div>
</div>
<br>
Hi <a data-huddler-embed="href" href="/u/540936/1usmus">@1usmus</a>,<br>
I will go straight for answers:<br><ol class="bbcode_list"><li>Tried those CAD_BUS values. Got little stable on 20 20 30 30 (on 30 30 60 60 earlier errors or BSOD), but still random BSOD and Memtest errors after 10%, sometimes immediately. Tried also various<br>
DRAM Voltage for 1.385 - 1.42.<br>
SOC - 1.08.<br>
On 2T and GDM Disable, can't cold boot...wierd.</li>
<li>Here is RTC<br></li>
</ol><br><a class="H-lightbox-open" href="http://www.overclock.net/content/type/61/id/3152965/"><img alt="" class="lightbox-enabled" data-id="3152965" data-type="61" src="http://www.overclock.net/content/type/61/id/3152965/width/500/height/1000/flags/LL" style="; width: 500px; height: 603px"></a><br><br>
Please let me know if U think your BIOS MOD should do some wonders or should I wait for AGESA 1.0.0.7 (1.0.7.0)?<br>
I read in few places that it won't bring some major additional improvement of memory, just overhaul of BIOS...<br><br><br>
Велике спасибі за ваш час та підтримку
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
683 Posts
His Bios Mod work superb!<br><br>
I have no f***ing stuttering anymore<br>
The latency timer is down to <b>3.2</b> from 3.8.<br><br>
Southbridge without spread spectrum and HPET.<br><br>
Control over SATA > i choosed show as ID 0x7904.<br><br>
Win 10 fall fresh install with this > <a href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/windows-10-lite/" target="_blank">https://sourceforge.net/projects/windows-10-lite/</a><br><br>
No iNet connection.<br>
Disabled allow driver download.<br>
Installed Amd Chipset driver, nvidia 388, latest Intel Lan driver 22.9, Titanium HD Pax 3.7.<br>
Recognized with SDI <a href="https://sdi-tool.org" target="_blank">https://sdi-tool.org</a> that there is a SATA driver available for Amd sata installed it.<br><br>
And beng! Fps is higher teamspeak starts without mouse stuck. And this time i have no sound scratches with sata driver installed (had this all the time before).<br><br>
Btw i was on 9940 bios version.<br><br>
This time i dont know why i had luck with 1701 because of the calc <img alt="wink.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/wink.gif"><br><br>
Thx mate! I hate everything with *Spread* in it.<br>
And i dont understand why they dont let us choose it.
 
241 - 260 of 9961 Posts
Top