[Matthew89]

Looking for a new mouse for FPS gaming,
your thoughts?

 

[sn0w]

I switched from my mx518 and Zowie AM and havn't looked back

 

[vss vintorez]

IF you're just on those 3. I would pick g400 without hesitate. (I like high tracking rates, 1-1 movement, low lod [g400 is good compared to other mice in terms of lod] and preciscion).
This mouse accomplish those tasks really well.

 

[vss vintorez]

Quote:

Originally Posted by sn0w

I switched from my mx518 and Zowie AM and havn't looked back

Well those 2 mice are really different between them.

G400 compared to AM:

AM doesn't have angle snapping - G400 doesn't have angle snapping.
AM has extremely low LOD - G400 is lower than the MX518 but higher than the AM.
AM has low tracking rates - G400 double AM's tracking rates.
AM isn't that good in terms of presicion - G400 is really good but not the best.
AM has unstable polling rate at 1kHz - G400 is stable at 1kHz.

 

[CtrlAltel1te]

no deathadder or savu in youre poll

 

[villain]

Depends on your preference. Razer mice are light, Logitech mice are on the heavier side and more massive.

I have both the G400 (and previously a MX518) and the DeathAdder 3.5G (and previously a 3G). Out of the two the DA feels superior in every way. The new 2013 version comes with rubber side grips (no more glossy).

 

[Makav3li]

Quote:

Originally Posted by vss vintorez

Well those 2 mice are really different between them.

G400 compared to AM:

AM doesn't have angle snapping - G400 doesn't have angle snapping.
AM has extremely low LOD - G400 is lower than the MX518 but higher than the AM. This is subjective, but I consider low LOD a pro.
AM has low tracking rates - G400 double AM's tracking rates. Define "low". It has higher tracking than imo/wmo etc. that are still very widely used. More than enough tracking speed for low sensitivity gaming.
AM isn't that good in terms of presicion - G400 is really good but not the best. It has no jitter at 450/1150dpi, some at 2300 which isn't widely used considering it's designed by and for low sensitivity style fps. Most people use 450dpi with this mouse.
AM has unstable polling rate at 1kHz - G400 is stable at 1kHz. I don't believe this is true. If I remember correctly it was a bug with certain chipsets that would show inaccurate readings.

That's my take on your generalized statements.

 

[noobdown]

I suggest the genius gila.

http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/06/genius-gila-gaming-mouse-hands-on/

 

[viowastaken]

Quote:

Originally Posted by noobdown

I suggest the genius gila.

http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/06/genius-gila-gaming-mouse-hands-on/

Most avago 9800 sensor based mice are more or less universally agreed to be unsuitable or at least suboptimal for FPS.

My suggestions are:
Deathadder
G400

 

[MrFerrari]

Quote:

Originally Posted by noobdown

I suggest the genius gila.

http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/06/genius-gila-gaming-mouse-hands-on/

12 buttons and removable weight. This has never been a good recipe for a FPS mouse.