Overclock.net banner

[Official] NVIDIA RTX 4080 / SUPER Owner's Club

290K views 2K replies 196 participants last post by  petsku1993  
#1 · (Edited)
Last Updated: November 16, 2022

Note: This content is licensed under Creative Commons 3.0. This means that you are free to copy and redistribute this material, but only if the following criteria are met: 1) You must give appropriate credit by linking back to this thread. 2) You may not use this material for commercial purposes or place this on a for-profit website with ads. 3) You cannot create derivative work based on this material.

NVIDIA GeForce® RTX 4080


⠀⠀RTX 4080 Owner's Club
RTX 4090 Owner's Club


Click here to join the discussion on Discord or join directly through the Discord app with the code kkuFR3d

Image

Source: NVIDIA

SPECS (Click Spoiler)

Rich (BB code):
 
   Architecture Ada Lovelace
   Chip AD103-300
   Transistors 45,900 million
   Die Size 379 mm²
   Manufacturing Process 4nm

   CUDA Cores 9728
   TMUs 304
   ROPs 112
   SM Count 76
   Tensor Cores 304
   GigaRays -- GR/s

   Core Clock 2210 MHz
   Boost Clock 2510 MHz
   Memory 16GB GDDR6X
   Memory Bus 256-bit
   Memory Clock 1400 MHz / 22400 MHz
   Memory Bandwidth 716 GB/s
   External Power Supply 16-Pin
   TDP 320W

   DirectX 12.2 Ultimate
   OpenGL 4.6
   OpenCL 3.0
   Vulkan 1.3
   CUDA 8.9

   Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
   Connectors 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
   Dimensions 304 x 137mm (3-Slot)

   Price $1199 US

   Release Date November 16, 2022

Rich (BB code):
RTX 4090    | AD102-300 |  4nm | 608mm² | 76.3 BT | 16384 CCs | 512 TMUs | 176 ROPs | 128 SMs | 2520 MHz |  24GB | 2048MB x 12 | GDDR6X | 384-bit | 1008 GB/s | 450W⠀⠀
RTX 4080    | AD103-300 |  4nm | 379mm² | 45.9 BT |⠀ 9728 CCs | 304 TMUs | 112 ROPs | ⠀76 SMs | 2505 MHz |  16GB | 2048MB x 8  | GDDR6X | 256-bit | ⠀716 GB/s | 320W⠀⠀
RTX 3090 Ti | GA102-350 |  8nm | 628mm² | 28.3 BT | 10752 CCs | 336 TMUs | 112 ROPs | ⠀84 SMs | 1865 MHz |  24GB | 2048MB x 12 | GDDR6X | 384-bit | 1008 GB/s | 450W⠀⠀
RTX 3090    | GA102-300 |  8nm | 628mm² | 28.3 BT | 10496 CCs | 328 TMUs | 112 ROPs | ⠀82 SMs | 1695 MHz |  24GB | 1024MB x 24 | GDDR6X | 384-bit | ⠀936 GB/s | 350W⠀⠀
RTX 3080 Ti | GA102-250 |  8nm | 628mm² | 28.3 BT | 10240 CCs | 320 TMUs | 112 ROPs | ⠀80 SMs | 1665 MHz |  12GB | 1024MB x 12 | GDDR6X | 384-bit | ⠀912 GB/s | 320W⠀⠀
RTX 3080    | GA102-200 |  8nm | 628mm² | 28.3 BT |⠀ 8704 CCs | 272 TMUs |  96 ROPs | ⠀68 SMs | 1710 MHz |  10GB | 1024MB x 10 | GDDR6X | 320-bit | ⠀760 GB/s | 320W
Note: Gaming performance on Ampere and later, do not scale linearly with CUDA core count when compared with previous generations.
Rich (BB code):
RTX 2080 Ti | TU102-300 | 12nm | 754mm² | 18.6 BT |⠀ 4352 CCs  | 272 TMUs |  88 ROPs | ⠀68 SMs | 1635 MHz |  11GB | 1024MB x 11 | GDDR6  | 352-bit | ⠀616 GB/s | 250W
RTX 2080 S  | TU104-450 | 12nm | 545mm² | 13.6 BT |⠀ 3072 CCs  | 192 TMUs |  64 ROPs | ⠀48 SMs | 1815 MHz |   8GB | 1024MB x 8  | GDDR6  | 256-bit | ⠀496 GB/s | 250W
RTX 2080    | TU104-400 | 12nm | 545mm² | 13.6 BT |⠀ 2944 CCs  | 184 TMUs |  64 ROPs | ⠀46 SMs | 1710 MHz |   8GB | 1024MB x 8  | GDDR6  | 256-bit | ⠀448 GB/s | 215W
GTX 1080 Ti | GP102-350 | 16nm | 471mm² | 12.0 BT |⠀ 3584 CCs  | 224 TMUs |  88 ROPs | ⠀28 SMs | 1582 MHz |  11GB | 1024MB x 11 | GDDR5X | 352-bit | ⠀484 GB/s | 250W
GTX 1080    | GP104-400 | 16nm | 314mm² |  7.2 BT | ⠀2560 CCs  | 160 TMUs |  64 ROPs | ⠀20 SMs | 1733 MHz |   8GB | 1024MB x 8  | GDDR5X | 256-bit | ⠀320 GB/s | 180W
GTX 980 Ti  | GM200-310 | 28nm | 601mm² |  8.0 BT |⠀ 2816 CCs  | 172 TMUs |  96 ROPs | ⠀22 SMs | 1076 MHz |   6GB |  512MB x 12 | GDDR5  | 384-bit | ⠀336 GB/s | 250W
GTX 980     | GM204-400 | 28nm | 398mm² |  5.2 BT |⠀ 2048 CCs  | 128 TMUs |  64 ROPs | ⠀16 SMs | 1216 MHz |   4GB |  512MB x 8  | GDDR5  | 256-bit | ⠀224 GB/s | 165W
GTX 780 Ti  | GK110-425 | 28nm | 551mm² |  7.1 BT |⠀ 2880 CCs  | 240 TMUs |  48 ROPs | ⠀15 SMs |  928 MHz |   3GB |  256MB x 12 | GDDR5  | 384-bit |⠀ 336 GB/s | 250W
GTX 780     | GK110-300 | 28nm | 551mm² |  7.1 BT | ⠀2304 CCs  | 192 TMUs |  48 ROPs | ⠀12 SMs |  900 MHz |   3GB |  256MB x 12 | GDDR5  | 384-bit |⠀ 288 GB/s | 250W
GTX 680     | GK104-400 | 28nm | 294mm² |  3.5 BT |⠀ 1536 CCs  | 128 TMUs |  32 ROPs |  ⠀8 SMs | 1058 MHz |   2GB |  256MB x 8  | GDDR5  | 256-bit | ⠀192 GB/s | 200W
GTX 580     | GF110-375 | 40nm | 520mm² |  3.0 BT |  ⠀512 CCs  |  64 TMUs |  48 ROPs | ⠀16 SMs |  772 MHz | 1.5GB |  128MB x 12 | GDDR5  | 384-bit | ⠀192 GB/s | 250W

ASUS
AsusTek Computer (stylised as ASUS) was founded in Taipei, Taiwan in 1989, currently headquartered in Taipei, Taiwan.

ModelLengthSlotFanHDMIBIOSPower LimitPCBPWMGPU StageVRAM StageMPN

COLORFUL - Not available in Europe or North America
Colorful Group (referred to as CFG) was founded in Shenzhen, China in 1995, currently headquartered in Shenzhen, China.


ModelLengthSlotFanHDMIBIOSPower LimitPCBPWMGPU StageVRAM StageMPN

GALAX | KFA2 - Not available in North America
GALAXY was founded in Hong Kong, China in 1994, GALAXY and its European brand KFA2 (Kick Friggin Ass) merged in 2014 to form GALAX as a single unified brand, the name KFA2 still exist for the European market but all designs are GALAX, currently headquartered in Hong Kong, China.


ModelLengthSlotFanHDMIBIOSPower LimitPCBPWMGPU StageVRAM StageMPN

GIGABYTE
GIGA-BYTE Technology (stylised as GIGABYTE) was founded in Taipei, Taiwan in 1986, currently headquartered in Taipei, Taiwan and California, United States.

ModelLengthSlotFanHDMIBIOSPower LimitPCBPWMGPU StageVRAM StageMPN

INNO3D
InnoVISION Multimedia was founded in Hong Kong, China in 1989, primarily recognized for its graphic cards marketed under the Inno3D brand, acquired by PC Partner in 2008, currently headquartered in Hong Kong, China.

ModelLengthSlotFanHDMIBIOSPower LimitPCBPWMGPU StageVRAM StageMPN

MSI
Micro-Star International (stylised MSI) was founded in Taipei, Taiwan in 1986, currently headquartered in Taipei, Taiwan.

ModelLengthSlotFanHDMIBIOSPower LimitPCBPWMGPU StageVRAM StageMPN

NVIDIA
Nvidia Corporation (stylised nVIDIA) was founded in California, United States in 1993, currently headquartered in California, United States.

ModelLengthSlotFanHDMIBIOSPower LimitPCBPWMGPU StageVRAM StageMPN

PALIT | GAINWARD - Not available in North America
Palit Microsystems (stylised PaLiT) was founded in Taipei, Taiwan in 1988, acquired the Gainward brand and company in 2005, currently headquartered in Taipei, Taiwan.


ModelLengthSlotFanHDMIBIOSPower LimitPCBPWMGPU StageVRAM StageMPN

PNY
PNY Technologies was founded in New York, United States in 1985, currently headquartered in New Jersey, United States.

ModelLengthSlotFanHDMIBIOSPower LimitPCBPWMGPU StageVRAM StageMPN

ZOTAC
ZOTAC is under the umbrella of PC Partner, and was founded in Hong Kong, China in 2006, currently headquartered in Hong Kong, China.

ModelLengthSlotFanHDMIBIOSPower LimitPCBPWMGPU StageVRAM StageMPN

TECHPOWERUP | GPU-Z

Download TechPowerUp GPU-Z

NVIDIA | NVFLASH

Download NVIDIA NVFlash

BIOS | ROM

TechPowerUp BIOS Collection < Verified

TechPowerUp BIOS Collection < Unverified

OVERCLOCKING | TOOLS

Download ASUS GPUTweak III

Download Colorful iGame Center

Download Gainward EXPERTool

Download Galax/KFA2 Xtreme Tuner Plus

Download Gigabyte AORUS Engine

Download Inno3D TuneIT

Download MSI Afterburner

Download Palit ThunderMaster

Download PNY Velocity X

Download Zotac FireStorm
 
See less See more
Preview image for a collapsed post.
1
#1,137 ·
Yeah, i've changed thermal pads and paste and ripped the warranty label. They use ALOT of paste, and I mean ALOT. Before changing my card was hitting about 55°c on the core at 320w with stock bios. Now i'm hitting about 48°c at 370w with the MSI 4080 Super Expert bios. I've reduced the fan speed to 1000rpm, instead of the 1400rpm i was using before. (2x360 rad)
 
#1,138 ·
That much difference would be worth it for me. I'm at 69c core 85c hotspot now at 370w but that's on 54% fan speed on air. If I can drop 5-8c that would be nice. MX6 or PK3 should be able to do that.
 
#1,147 ·
I can be honest here. On the stock BIOS at 320w my card is as good as quiet with coil whine but at 400+w it has quite the squeak lol.

I thought about grabbing a Alphacool Eiswolf for the card but then I remembered I can't actually fit another 360 in my case..

Is there like, a 240 or 280 AIO solution like the Eiswolf for the 4080? The Inno3D uses the "reference" PCB btw. Same as PNY and some other models.
 
#1,153 ·
I can be honest here. On the stock BIOS at 320w my card is as good as quiet with coil whine but at 400+w it has quite the squeak lol.

I thought about grabbing a Alphacool Eiswolf for the card but then I remembered I can't actually fit another 360 in my case..

Is there like, a 240 or 280 AIO solution like the Eiswolf for the 4080? The Inno3D uses the "reference" PCB btw. Same as PNY and some other models.
If you run higher power and voltages throgh the vrm its normal to hear buzzing sound, but i am talking with official bios, if there is coil whine on it, that card prob last max 3-4 years because already too high for it.
 
#1,148 · (Edited)
Just picked up a new Gigabyte 4080 Super Gaming OC before the prices seemingly went up over night. I would have liked the Master, but since release, haven't seen them in stock at release price. Quick impressions - its a really nice card. Seems well built. Zero coil whine so far. PCB is small. 3000/1500 very easy. Temps are very good for a stock cooler. The cooler is huge compared to the pcb. My old x299 platform not doing me any favors in benches. Some glitching between 3d Mark, AB(latest beta and nvidia driver), and GPUz software. Moving voltage slider decreases read voltage to .950mv instead of increasing, as read by AB. Stock was reading 1.00mv. Spiking to 1.095mv during bench in GPUz.. 3080/1500 and it starts to get perfcap due to power. Topping at 355w. Temps are good.
 
#1,159 ·
I repasted it but for the Inno3D the sticker is on the backplate and another one from backplate.wrapped over to the PCB. Neither of them have to be broken to remove the cooler. I repasted without damaging either of them.

I did figure out it's not paste or fan speed / airflow limiting my cooler. The block just isn't any more efficient. At 355-360w constant load temps are basically identical between 38% fan speed and 60% fan speed. Not even 1c difference. Only at the full 100% does it drop a bit but less then I'd expect. About 6c only.

So, is it still within reason to run a peak of 74.9c core with 87.5c hotspot and 60.0c VRAM? It sounds pretty reasonable to me tbh at constant 360w load (3045 @ 1.100v).
 
#1,160 ·
my sticker broke after getting wet due to a leak from the water block
 
#1,164 · (Edited)
I was trying some undervolting + Overclocking with the curve and while my card loves to just stretch it's legs at the full 1.100v with 370w it really doesn't wanna undervolt OC well at all.

I tried to push something like 2925 @ 1.025v but in RT it is so unstable it will crash within minutes. 2865 @ 0.985v (which is what my 4070 Ti ran fine) it's not even loading into Cyberpunk with PT enabled.

So yeah, can't just blindly trust the curve. +195 at max voltage is stable but +195 at 1.025 is not for example. I can probably pull off about 2910-2925 at 1.035v ish but that isn't enough of an undervolt to be worth it. I wanna make a low power profile that uses like max 270-280w for hot summers and games that don't need the full 3060-3045Mhz. I will probably end out somewhere in the low 2800's with 0.980-1.000v ish I guess.

EDIT: so, I got a stable profile set up. 2850 @ 0.990 with 12500 (+1000) VRAM. It's sitting around 262w in Cyberpunk with Path Tracing with temps at 61-62 core 74c hotspot 58c VRAM at very low fan speeds (about 34%) and thus is very very quiet and efficient. FPS is only about 4 (89 vs 93 in the same static scene) lower than 3045 +500 VRAM @ 1.100 at 360w. Percentage wise that's about 5% mainly because I can push VRAM higher to +1000 (or more, haven't tested any higher yet) without dropping core clocks due to higher power consumption but it drops power and temps by like 30% so yeah. Way more efficient.

She's definitely a keeper with two exceptions. If I ever find a MSRP or used ASUS Strix or factory AIO card I'll scoop that up for sure.
 
#1,165 · (Edited)
#1,167 · (Edited)
Sure, as you wish. Speed Way is not CPU or RAM bound at all though, and Time Spy Extreme barely. A quick run should be simple: push the fans to 100 %, clock up voltage, GPU and VRAM, maybe open a window in the room and bench it, that is what I did (ShirKhan @3DMark). My card cannot run +195 MHz stable in games. 180 in some of them, only 165 everywhere. That's why I'd love to see your scores. :)
 
#1,176 ·
Actually, if you do Ctrl F in MSI Afterburner for curve editor and switch from voltage tab to temperature tab you'll see the 4080S does NOT drop boost bins at 70 but at 83. It's a flat line. Mine doesn't drop boost bins at all even at insane temps 81c core 96c hotspot still did not drop from 3060 @ 1.100 at all with a 450w BIOS.

Not that I run that daily but for benches.. it's rather nice.

Daily is at 2850 @ 0.990v with +1000 memory now drawing about 260w in Cyberpunk with PT and in lighter stuff like Division 2 or World of Tanks it barely breaks 200w. 55c core 66c hotspot at 34% fan speed. I like.
 
#1,177 ·
Actually, if you do Ctrl F in MSI Afterburner for curve editor and switch from voltage tab to temperature tab you'll see the 4080S does NOT drop boost bins at 70 but at 83. It's a flat line. Mine doesn't drop boost bins at all even at insane temps 81c core 96c hotspot still did not drop from 3060 @ 1.100 at all with a 450w BIOS.

Not that I run that daily but for benches.. it's rather nice.

Daily is at 2850 @ 0.990v with +1000 memory now drawing about 260w in Cyberpunk with PT and in lighter stuff like Division 2 or World of Tanks it barely breaks 200w. 55c core 66c hotspot at 34% fan speed. I like.
I got the same number on my undervolt.
Set 2865mhz, drops to 2850mhz at 0.990v.
The hardess pass by far was 3dmark speedway.
 
#1,181 · (Edited)
My undervolt 0.990v at 2865mhz is a 135mhz overclock.
Thanks, that I could see in the video. Very nice. Yet, the numbers don't seem to match, explanation below.

What is your stock boost clock?
2820, 60 MHz lower than yours. So, my card should need +195 MHz @990 mV to reach 2865. But as shown above, +255 are needed. 60 MHz missing, that's odd.

Next what is strange: Your SW score of 7547 with this great OCUV setting.

Screenshot Font Rectangle Software Electronic device


Here around +200 pts are scored with only +120 Mhz @975 mV. In Speed Way this is a notable difference. A higher score with a significantly lower GPU frequency ... maybe a matter of too many background apps in Windows on your side?

Screenshot Font Software Operating system Electronic device

Link

Could you upload the run in the video and link to it? Maybe the frequency data shed some light on this.
 
#1,182 ·
Thanks, that I could see in the video. Very nice. Yet, the numbers don't seem to match, explanation below.


2820, 60 MHz lower than yours. So, my card should need +195 MHz @990 mV to reach 2865. But as shown above, +255 are needed. 60 MHz missing, that's odd.

Next what is strange: Your SW score of 7547 with this great OCUV setting.

View attachment 2649853

Here around +200 pts are scored - with only +120 Mhz @975 mV. In Speed Way that is a notable difference. A higher score with a significantly lower GPU frequency ... maybe a matter of too many background apps in Windows on your side?

View attachment 2649861
Link

Could you upload the run in the video and link to it? Maybe the frequency data shed some light on this.
The only thing i can think of why the score is lower is that i run pcie Gen 3.

Sure i can do that tomorow and even a run with gen 4.
 
#1,185 ·
Curious what type of minimums you guys are getting @ 1080p with a 5800X3D, High settings, in CS2. I get some bad minimum dips when starting on the T side of Nuke like mid to high 100s, the CT side i'm in the low 200s for my mins, in a 10 vs 10. When less players are in the server the minimums are noticeably higher.
 
#1,187 · (Edited)
nilssohn
Here is the score running pcie gen 4.

Running the fans at 100% and got a even better result, 2880mhz (drops to 2865mhz) at 0.990v.
Got my block today, hoppfully i get even better result :)
Gas Technology Electrical wiring Machine Automotive lighting
 
#1,188 · (Edited)
Got my block today, hoppfully i get even better result :)
Before you install it, maybe you wanna check the card's potential in SW on air first for comparison. 1100 mV, no powerlimit, max GPU clock, 100 % fans. Please clock the VRAM to its limit, Speed Way score is memory dependant.

Font Rectangle Screenshot Software Technology


Highscore so far:
 
  • Rep+
Reactions: Jwick
#1,191 ·
well I tested the limits of my card windforce v2 4080S. i couldnt hold 3000MHz for 5 secs. 2985MHz only for 10+ sec and crash. it can do 2970MHz right now.
and I put mems to 12800MHz (25.6Gbps) which all 4080S cards should do, I also tried 26Gbps but no difference in perf.

edit: power used was msot 360W, this is 385W bios. So i dont have to flash 400+W bioses as its not even close to 385W.
 
  • Rep+
Reactions: nilssohn
#1,194 ·
I got around 8260 in Speedway. The 4080 Super is really an amazing GPU for 4K gaming.

@robalm how is the quality of the EKWB block? I thought their stuff seemed pretty chintzy in the past. It’s also really expensive at like $280.
 
#1,196 ·
If I ever decide to watercool the card I'm 100% going Alphacool for the block. Had many good experiences with their blocks.
 
#1,201 ·
Are you going to use different pads? I always thought the EKWB pads were a little chintzy.

If I order one, I may as well go all out and get some nice Gelid pads too.
 
#1,205 · (Edited)
Sorry I replied on page earlier instead of just posting it.

RE: Alphacool and EK.

From personal experience, Alphacool is still trash I don't think they even check quality of their products before they ship.
As far is EK? I used EK once in 2019 and never again, but my nephew who got their block recently can confirm that what EK was always terrible at and that was their nickle plating prematurely wearing out, especially pealing is still the same years later and dealing with returns! that is another headache.

He send his Quantum Vector RTX 4090 RGB Nickle plexi block for RMA due to nickel turned black and came off clogging his loop, Its been 2 weeks, he still waiting, they might look nice and shiny, but not for long, frankly I'm surprised EK is still in business.

I used Aquacomputer and Heatkiller blocks, Heatkiller more so on one of my Strix 3090 and even on much earlier, older cards e.g Titans Black, Titan RTX and never ever single issue, in fact, after almost 2 years taking one of the blocks of Titan Black after using distilled with Mayhems Biocide, block still looked like new.
 
#1,207 ·
If you are happy with "just a block" and nothing fancy you can't beat Bykski or Barrow.
 
  • Helpful
Reactions: kairi_zeroblade
#1,209 · (Edited)
Anyone who has water-cooled for a long time knows by now which brands are to be most likely best in their line of products with lowest failure rate of any kind and easiest RMA process compare to other brands.

In my 2 decades of water-cooling, although I still do air-cool specific systems, but here is my list of blocks, fittings and coolants brands that have performed absolutely superb with 1-2% small issue(s) that were rectified by company(s) within timely fashion and these products in my experience are "buy once" and forget it, unless you upgrading and block(s) are no longer compatible.

GPU and CPU blocks:

Heatkiller
Aquacomputer
Bykski

Fittings always Bitspowers. I have tried Aquacomputer, alphacool.....nahhh....Bitspowers tolerance and quality is by far superior, expensive, but in my opinion worth it.
Liquids Mayhems Biocida with distilled water has been awesome and Aquacomputer Double protect Ultra.
 
#1,210 ·
I absolutely loved my bitspower summit m pro block for the looks but the performance just wasn't there. On the 5900X I swapped it for a TechN that was far superior. For fluid I always use Mayhems X1 premix in a 5 liter can and for tubing Mayhems Ultra Clear. I had EK fittings, junk. The y splitter especially felt super loose and leaked all the time at the junction o ring..
 
#1,215 ·
Hello!

First, sorry for my bad english...

I have a 4080 ichill frostbite with D5 pump and 1080 rad. Temp water doesn't exceed 28°C in game but the GPU is around 60°C :(. Do you think the waterblock is incorrectly mount?
What do you recommend that I do?

Thank you in advance :)
What's the hotspot temperature? Check in HWINFO64. That would tell us way more about the quality of the mount.

As soon as I see single D5 + 1080 rad I'm like.. flow rate? My D5 could barely handle a 280 + 420 + CPU + GPU block + 10/13mm tubing + lots of restrictive fittings. Flow rate even at 100% PWM was.. borderline... And if I ran the pump at anything under 80% PWM it would make temps shoot up a lot. How is the loop built fitting wise, lots of 90's, small tubing? CPU block also in the loop?