[Official] NVIDIA Titan X Pascal Owners Thread
634115
7655
http://www.geforce.com/hardware/10series/titan-x-pascal
Elite members welcome 24/7.
Peasants opening times 4:45pm - 5:00pm.
Peasants must remain behind barriers at all times.
DO NOT TOUCH IT. DO NOT SNEEZE EVER!. DO NOT BREATHE ON IT...
I SAID DON'T BREATHE ON IT!
and no RGB's... don't you even think about it
1 - 20 of 7656 Posts
Joined
·
601 Posts
imagine the AUD then... $2000 or thereabouts.
Joined
·
11,185 Posts
Quote:
I'm more concerned with how GTX 1080 owners must be feeling right now, spending so much money on the GTX 1080 which was almost Titan X money in the first place for a midrange die, only for this monster to come along so soon after. Especially when you consider how long it was before people actually got hold of the GTX 1080 and SLI HB Bridge due to low stocks.
This is probably the biggest stab in the back I've ever seen from Nvidia. 6months later sure, but 2months? Man that's gotta hurt....
It was something I expected to see happen this year, but not August 2nd. That was waaaaaaay sooner than I expected.Originally Posted by Leyaena
I'm straight up disappointed. No GP100, no HBM2 and a higher price tag that the previous TX... I'll wait for the benchmarks, but I'll probably be passing on this one. At an msrp like that, I'd expect it to be 1.5k EUR over here at the minimum.
I'm more concerned with how GTX 1080 owners must be feeling right now, spending so much money on the GTX 1080 which was almost Titan X money in the first place for a midrange die, only for this monster to come along so soon after. Especially when you consider how long it was before people actually got hold of the GTX 1080 and SLI HB Bridge due to low stocks.
This is probably the biggest stab in the back I've ever seen from Nvidia. 6months later sure, but 2months? Man that's gotta hurt....
Joined
·
92 Posts
Why would any half intelligent person purchase computer components solely based on it being the best and not around what fits their needs.
If I was a 1080 owner I would care less to what new card came out so long as I was still hitting my intended frame rates based on the research I would have done before purchasing a high end component.
I don't really think 1080 owners care about new titan x release, nor should they.
If I was a 1080 owner I would care less to what new card came out so long as I was still hitting my intended frame rates based on the research I would have done before purchasing a high end component.
I don't really think 1080 owners care about new titan x release, nor should they.
Quote:
From the looks of it, the 1080 still has better price to performance. I've seen claims that the TX Pascal is supposed to be ~60% faster than the old TX, which puts it around the ~25-30% faster than 1080, but it almost costs 2x as much.Originally Posted by Mhill2029
It was something I expected to see happen this year, but not August 2nd. That was waaaaaaay sooner than I expected.
I'm more concerned with how GTX 1080 owners must be feeling right now, spending so much money on the GTX 1080 which was almost Titan X money in the first place for a midrange die, only for this monster to come along so soon after. Especially when you consider how long it was before people actually got hold of the GTX 1080 and SLI HB Bridge due to low stocks.
This is probably the biggest stab in the back I've ever seen from Nvidia. 6months later sure, but 2months? Man that's gotta hurt....
Quote:
I'm sure I read that Nvidia pushed Volta back to 2018. So I think they're stretching Pascal out over two years. Like this.
They release flagship 1080 based on GP104 (as they have done already). But now the 1080 outperforms Titan X, so to rectify the situation they release new Titan X based on GP102 with GDDR5X memory.
NEXT YEAR, 2017: Is when they release the GP100 with HBM2 positioned above Titan X (or replacing it) and release a slightly cut down GP100 as 1080Ti. Both with performance improvements over the 2016 releases.
Just a theory.
I have a theory.Originally Posted by Leyaena
I'm straight up disappointed. No GP100, no HBM2 and a higher price tag that the previous TX... I'll wait for the benchmarks, but I'll probably be passing on this one. At an msrp like that, I'd expect it to be 1.5k EUR over here at the minimum.
I'm sure I read that Nvidia pushed Volta back to 2018. So I think they're stretching Pascal out over two years. Like this.
They release flagship 1080 based on GP104 (as they have done already). But now the 1080 outperforms Titan X, so to rectify the situation they release new Titan X based on GP102 with GDDR5X memory.
NEXT YEAR, 2017: Is when they release the GP100 with HBM2 positioned above Titan X (or replacing it) and release a slightly cut down GP100 as 1080Ti. Both with performance improvements over the 2016 releases.
Just a theory.
Joined
·
350 Posts
Quote:
Yes agree. For that price I can get 2x 1080 GTX. The 1080 has a better price/performance ratio. Unless you are running 4k and wanting over 60fps, a 1080 is a better bet.Originally Posted by Lays
From the looks of it, the 1080 still has better price to performance. I've seen claims that the TX Pascal is supposed to be ~60% faster than the old TX, which puts it around the ~25-30% faster than 1080, but it almost costs 2x as much.
Joined
·
5,171 Posts
You guys have a lot of catching up to do:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1606550/twitter-jen-hsun-introduces-the-new-nvidia-titan-x
http://www.overclock.net/t/1606550/twitter-jen-hsun-introduces-the-new-nvidia-titan-x
Quote:
![thumb.gif]()
.
Anyway, in my opinion the just-announced Titan X is not the last one in the Pascal line, it has 250 W TDP and DDR5 RAM while the P100 for computing has 300 W TDP and HBM2 memory. One can thus expect a similar Titan XXL with the TDP of 300 W, HBM2 memory and with killing heart-attack price
![mad.gif]()
.
I would if I am sure 7 of such cards would run in a single mobo having 7 PCIe slots (with watercooling the cards can be converted to single-slot)Originally Posted by Zurv
oh god.. i have soooo many pointless video cards now.
After i upgrade to these new titans.. i'll have 8! gtx 1080s and 7 Titan X... anyone looking to buy some cards![tongue.gif]()
Anyway, in my opinion the just-announced Titan X is not the last one in the Pascal line, it has 250 W TDP and DDR5 RAM while the P100 for computing has 300 W TDP and HBM2 memory. One can thus expect a similar Titan XXL with the TDP of 300 W, HBM2 memory and with killing heart-attack price
Joined
·
384 Posts
Quote:
![tongue.gif]()
Indeed i amOriginally Posted by Zurv
oh god.. i have soooo many pointless video cards now.
After i upgrade to these new titans.. i'll have 8! gtx 1080s and 7 Titan X...
anyone looking to buy some cards![tongue.gif]()
Joined
·
2,198 Posts
Quote:
Why would they feel bad? That card is twice the price of a GTX 1080 for 30% more performance.Originally Posted by Mhill2029
It was something I expected to see happen this year, but not August 2nd. That was waaaaaaay sooner than I expected.
I'm more concerned with how GTX 1080 owners must be feeling right now, spending so much money on the GTX 1080 which was almost Titan X money in the first place for a midrange die, only for this monster to come along so soon after. Especially when you consider how long it was before people actually got hold of the GTX 1080 and SLI HB Bridge due to low stocks.
This is probably the biggest stab in the back I've ever seen from Nvidia. 6months later sure, but 2months? Man that's gotta hurt....
Joined
·
897 Posts
Quote:
oh pooo.. i can' t post anything in the market till i have 35 rep.. hrmm.. i wonder what is needed to setup a selling account on amazonOriginally Posted by Zurv
oh god.. i have soooo many pointless video cards now.
After i upgrade to these new titans.. i'll have 8! gtx 1080s and 7 Titan X...
anyone looking to buy some cards![tongue.gif]()
Quote:
You can say that you can overclock GTX 1080 too. But due to the high starting clocks and aggressive adaptive overclocking you don't actually net more than 10% additional performance. If all of the above are true, you can have +50-60% of greater performance as compared to GTX 1080 merely by overclocking your Titan X. This in turn would make Titan X (overclocked) the first 4K card (minimum FPS to most games maxed @ 4K > 50FPS)
Can't say I'm not excited, what I can say is that I'll probably not be able to justify that cost to me (or my wife).
Depends on whether one overclocks or not. I suspect that the new Titan X would be loaded, it will have the overclockability of a founder's edition card. So if you overclock you would get it quite a lot higher than that as compared to a GTX 1080. For example if you reach 2-2.1 GHz (which is very possible for a founder edtion's card), you get at least 30% on top of its initial performance. That totals to around 70% above GTX 1080.Originally Posted by Juub
Why would they feel bad? That card is twice the price of a GTX 1080 for 30% more performance.
You can say that you can overclock GTX 1080 too. But due to the high starting clocks and aggressive adaptive overclocking you don't actually net more than 10% additional performance. If all of the above are true, you can have +50-60% of greater performance as compared to GTX 1080 merely by overclocking your Titan X. This in turn would make Titan X (overclocked) the first 4K card (minimum FPS to most games maxed @ 4K > 50FPS)
Can't say I'm not excited, what I can say is that I'll probably not be able to justify that cost to me (or my wife).
Joined
·
1,145 Posts
Quote:
So even if they both OC to 2100 on average, then the Titan would still be less than 50% faster. (1.14*1.3)
1417 vs 1607 base clockOriginally Posted by Steven185
Depends on whether one overclocks or not. I suspect that the new Titan X would be loaded, it will have the overclockability of a founder's edition card. So if you overclock you would get it quite a lot higher than that as compared to a GTX 1080. For example if you reach 2-2.1 GHz (which is very possible for a founder edtion's card), you get at least 30% on top of its initial performance. That totals to around 70% above GTX 1080.
You can say that you can overclock GTX 1080 too. But due to the high starting clocks and aggressive adaptive overclocking you don't actually net more than 10% additional performance. If all of the above are true, you can have +50-60% of greater performance as compared to GTX 1080 merely by overclocking your Titan X. This in turn would make Titan X (overclocked) the first 4K card (minimum FPS to most games maxed @ 4K > 50FPS)
Can't say I'm not excited, what I can say is that I'll probably not be able to justify that cost to me (or my wife).
So even if they both OC to 2100 on average, then the Titan would still be less than 50% faster. (1.14*1.3)
Quote:
Anyway these cards are priced very far apart. 700 dollars is a lot for me to spend on a GPU 1200 is unthinkable. It will be cool to see but speaking as a 1080 owner I was never going to buy it even if it launched first.
Your assuming it will overclock like a 1080. Pretty big assumption. Why in the world would Nvidia neuter the Titan's performance with clock speed out of the box anyways? Doesn't even make sense for them to do that to their flagship.Originally Posted by Steven185
Depends on whether one overclocks or not. I suspect that the new Titan X would be loaded, it will have the overclockability of a founder's edition card. So if you overclock you would get it quite a lot higher than that as compared to a GTX 1080. For example if you reach 2-2.1 GHz (which is very possible for a founder edtion's card), you get at least 30% on top of its initial performance. That totals to around 70% above GTX 1080.
You can say that you can overclock GTX 1080 too. But due to the high starting clocks and aggressive adaptive overclocking you don't actually net more than 10% additional performance. If all of the above are true, you can have +50-60% of greater performance as compared to GTX 1080 merely by overclocking your Titan X. This in turn would make Titan X (overclocked) the first 4K card (minimum FPS to most games maxed @ 4K > 50FPS)
Can't say I'm not excited, what I can say is that I'll probably not be able to justify that cost to me (or my wife).
Anyway these cards are priced very far apart. 700 dollars is a lot for me to spend on a GPU 1200 is unthinkable. It will be cool to see but speaking as a 1080 owner I was never going to buy it even if it launched first.
Joined
·
634 Posts
Quote:
Quote:
Don't use amazon. I've read about lots of people getting ripped off selling expensive items. Use /r/hardwareswapOriginally Posted by Zurv
oh pooo.. i can' t post anything in the market till i have 35 rep.. hrmm.. i wonder what is needed to setup a selling account on amazon
Quote:
Probably to keep it at 250w. But I agree, I don't see it clocking past 2000 like the other cards. Heat and PT will be killer. The FE cooler can't even keep the smaller chips cool.Originally Posted by jtom320
Your assuming it will overclock like a 1080. Pretty big assumption. Why in the world would Nvidia neuter the Titan's performance with clock speed out of the box anyways? Doesn't even make sense for them to do that to their flagship.
Joined
·
2,527 Posts
20% price increase over previous gen with no actual differences over the previous gen? At least Intel added some cores when they made a totally insane price increase. But I guess that's what you can get away with when you have literally zero competition and the future of multi-GPU is grim...
1 - 20 of 7656 Posts
