Overclock.net banner
1121 - 1140 of 17701 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
720 Posts
I couldnt resist! Its gonna be fun to pair it with the Strix 4090!



(8490kr = €776 or $764)
 
  • Rep+
Reactions: cstkl1

· Registered
Joined
·
1,310 Posts
I see what he did now. Apart from the fact that he covered up a ton of stuff (not sure why he even did that, don't see what there is to be secretive about), he's running the kit loosened to CL36, making it effectively worse than 7,200 MHz CL30, which is what most overclockers are running their tightened Hynix DDR5 kits at, and is what is actually managing to surpass DDR4 on the top-end.
he said in the vid he didn't want to go up with voltage high, so it's 1.4 or 1.45 V only, thus CL36.
it was also doing 7700 MHz, but again, at voltage he was not comfortable with, so higher than 1.4-1.45 V
 

· Facepalm
Joined
·
11,730 Posts
Guys, this 13900KF is f*cking insane.
Check out my submissions: **** (HWBOT)
View attachment 2576773
3DMark scores
Fire Strike Extreme
View attachment 2576771
Time Spy Extreme:
View attachment 2576772

Have a nice day ;)
i don't know what frequency and settings you're using but that's an atrocious R23 MT score. I can match that score at 5.7 ghz with stock ring and e cores. What was the actual all core frequency?
Would be nice to have some hwinfo64 screens up too to get an idea of the core speeds and voltages (with c-states disabled).
 

· Registered
Joined
·
249 Posts
i don't know what frequency and settings you're using but that's an atrocious R23 MT score. I can match that score at 5.7 ghz with stock ring and e cores. What was the actual all core frequency?
Would be nice to have some hwinfo64 screens up too to get an idea of the core speeds and voltages (with c-states disabled).
Max effective clock 5100. Write benchmate
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,180 Posts
i don't know what frequency and settings you're using but that's an atrocious R23 MT score. I can match that score at 5.7 ghz with stock ring and e cores. What was the actual all core frequency?
Would be nice to have some hwinfo64 screens up too to get an idea of the core speeds and voltages (with c-states disabled).
This seem to be his MT run:
Product Font Screenshot Software Computer

Autoclocking with maximum ~5.7ghz effective clock

Score seems very normal to me.. (?)
 

· Not New to Overclock.net
Joined
·
6,610 Posts
thanks i will give it a try later.
any voltage / frequency recommendation for reference , in general?

some vrm controller has some crazy vdroop with different LLC level on z790.
does raa229131 on z790 perform the same in terms of LLC with 13900k?
LLC3 0.24/1.1 works best for me . depends on your cpu but this gives me die sense load 1.128v
 

· Registered
Joined
·
30 Posts
i don't know what frequency and settings you're using but that's an atrocious R23 MT score. I can match that score at 5.7 ghz with stock ring and e cores. What was the actual all core frequency?
Would be nice to have some hwinfo64 screens up too to get an idea of the core speeds and voltages (with c-states disabled).
I’ll answer in an hour, drove 2x2.5 hours for these bench, the 42k one was with Asus AI, haven’t got time for more, cause had to travel back to be on a uni class….
On multicore, it was 5.5Ghz P core, and if I remember correctly, 4.7Ghz E core, 4.7Ghz Ring. There is more in this processor based on the voltage (1.28-1.32). :) (Asus AI chose very agressive LLC in my opinion to be stable)
 

· Registered
Joined
·
651 Posts
I’ll answer in an hour, drove 2x2.5 hours for these bench, the 42k one was with Asus AI, haven’t got time for more, cause had to travel back to be on a uni class….
On multicore, it was 5.5Ghz P core, and if I remember correctly, 4.7Ghz E core, 4.7Ghz Ring. There is more in this processor based on the voltage (1.28-1.32). :) (Asus AI chose very agressive LLC in my opinion to be stable)
What's your SP rating on the 69 apex p & e cores??
 

· Registered
Joined
·
30 Posts
No idea @Falkentyne may know?? Although still currently under NDA so maybe can't comment, What's your p core rating
Because I hadn't had time to OC it properly. I couldn't even try to reach a better score... I just used the Asus AI OC feature. I'm a University student, this is my big brothers PC. (I personally built it for him with my two hands, acquired the CPU from his money, acquired a GPU from his money on launch date for example, basically I helped him get a new PC, but its from his money), because of that and I live in Hungary and in Debrecen, I had to travel to Budapest (brother lives there) 3 times (2 times (back and forth) via Train, and 1 time with car (200km) just to build his PC. Because I had 8AM classes in Debrecen on the University, I didn't have time for more sadly.. :( I think it could be OC'd to 5.8GHz AllCore fixed and 6.2GHz (P core) Single Core. With more tweaking a 6.2-6.0-5.8-5.6GHz stable OC can be achieved with 12900KS voltages(?) I guess. We'll see more tomorrow, and I'll OC the processor according to the independent reviews and my own experience.
Few things to note here: CPU CONTACT FRAME IS INEVITABLE FOR OVERCLOCK.
AIO IS ALSO INEVITABLE EVEN FOR STOCK USAGE!
DELIDING AND POLISHING WILL ACHIEVE BETTER RESULTS!

P.S: DON'T DRIVE 200KM WHILE TIRED AFTER ASSEMBLING PC AND BENCHING IT AND SLEEPING 3 HOURS! :p
 

· Registered
Joined
·
30 Posts
One more bench for you guys, because in the past I played Counter Strike competetively (even organised LANs, and I know a lot of configuration FPS numbers I wanted to bench CSGO in my common settings (shadows high, everything low, msaa 8x, antistropic filtering x16, 1024x768) I benched CS:GO actually. And I have a picture about it. From this number alone, it doesn't seem, that the Source engine is being CPU limited. Max FPS was around 2400, lowest around 600.

This is on 64 tick local server.
Black Font Screenshot Multimedia Display device


And this is on 128 tick local server.

Font Screenshot Technology Electronic device Software

P.S: Please, don't blame phone screenshot XD I was tired, didn't want to fiddle around saving the screenshot..
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,180 Posts
One more bench for you guys, because in the past I played Counter Strike competetively (even organised LANs, and I know a lot of configuration FPS numbers I wanted to bench CSGO in my common settings (shadows high, everything low, msaa 8x, antistropic filtering x16, 1024x768) I benched CS:GO actually. And I have a picture about it. From this number alone, it doesn't seem, that the Source engine is being CPU limited. Max FPS was around 2400, lowest around 600.

This is on 64 tick local server.
View attachment 2576795

And this is on 128 tick local server.

View attachment 2576797
P.S: Please, don't blame phone screenshot XD I was tired, didn't want to fiddle around saving the screenshot..
As a comparison, this is my cpu from the other vendor. (some guys get their knickers in a twist when they see mention of the competitor in this thread)

1080p low
Screenshot Font Technology Software Multimedia


1080p high
Black Font Screenshot Technology Software

Very close results considering different platforms (y)
 
1121 - 1140 of 17701 Posts
Top