we didnt have this discussion before on the ryzen 1st gen??Just curious, is that in a game? I ask because when i had my ryzen cpu no matter of memory tweaking would surpass even 100mhz of core clock in cpu intensive games (WoW/pubg etc)
i went lower all way down to almost 60ns on a ryzen..just like cluckos and we were achieving better than what most reviewers were saying it should net you.. Not only that you can go and browse i had a 1700/1800x and a 2700x i even have my scheduler tweaked before windows actually patched a better scheduler on 1903.. still my tweaked version is betters than windows..
the goal here on a cpu bottleneck is give the gpu usage the %, you cant claim intel is giving you more frames.. it just give you more gpu usage you can level the game out..
a cpu magically is not giving you more frames is just giving you better hardware usage. You as a user have the opportunity to tweak this.. thats why in a gpu bottleneck is a straight line between them both practically equal you dont see the intel with 2ghz over ryzen to joke about it magically giving you 50 more frames lol
In gaming latency is king specially in low resolutions and fast fps.. on intel with 3200 CL 16 the latency is around 55ns all way down to 40ns (for a ballpark) im talking about stable stuff not suicide benches...