Overclock.net banner

1 - 10 of 10 Posts

·
News Junkie
Joined
·
8,232 Posts
Looks good, although your voltage is way high.

I had my [email protected] 3.8ghz with 1.53v.

You should be stable @ 3.7 with about 1.46v
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
990 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
I've tried the next voltage step down (1.5325) and it isn't stable. This MB likes AM3 cpus better than AM2+.
 

·
News Junkie
Joined
·
8,232 Posts
Really? Odd, I have exact same mobo. Must just be a power hungry chip you got there.
 

·
News Junkie
Joined
·
8,232 Posts
Yup. Load was about 54c, give or take 1c. Idle was about 33c give or take 1c
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
990 Posts
Discussion Starter #7
Any of you guys using the Venomous-X? There are a lot of Intel users but not too many AMD users.
 

·
 
Joined
·
13,020 Posts
It's not worth it to go from a TRUE to a Venomous X.

Some 940's need 1.55v for 3.7Ghz. Mine needs about 1.5v for 3.7Ghz, it's all up to what the your chip wants.

Look at what the TRUE can do with a 1090T, check out my 1090T 4.1Ghz proof link.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,134 Posts
Quote:


Originally Posted by Newbie2009
View Post

Looks good, although your voltage is way high.

I had my [email protected] 3.8ghz with 1.53v.

You should be stable @ 3.7 with about 1.46v

AMD requeires a much higher vltg than intel omg, not that this is a con or anything just a fact...
 
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Top