I had a Q8200 before, OCed with my current Asus P5QC, got up to 3.23ghz @ 1.35v. FSB 460 I think, 1:1 ratio memory.
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
Quote:
Most boards can do 440fsb and 1.35 volts to make a stable 3ghz outa this. It's a $30 cheaper entry into the quad core market than the 6600 and cause its 45nm it'll run cooler and use less power. I think I'll be including this proc in my next build. I read about the ease this goes thru cpu intensive tasks with that little OC.
Fits the bill just right for me. Cheapest intel quad core with a bit of an OC should make me future proof for a couple years at least.
Originally Posted by tbates1244 I never owned the q8200 but seeing as it only can do a 7x multiplier, I don't think it will OC any higher than your Q6600, probably lower. Your friend is gona have to have over 400 FSB just to get 2.8Ghz. It will be tough but it should still OC alright. |
Fits the bill just right for me. Cheapest intel quad core with a bit of an OC should make me future proof for a couple years at least.
Quote:
I understand that 3ghz (420 FSB) will be not hard, or even 3.2Ghz (460 FSB). I was just making note of the fact that at the max native "rated FSB" for that board (400FSB/1600 rated FSB) he will only be at 2.8ghz. The further you go over the max native "rated FSB", the harder it gets to OC. It is a great quad core though, you are correct.
Originally Posted by charliemopps Most boards can do 440fsb and 1.35 volts to make a stable 3ghz outa this. |
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
