I'm debating between Q9450 and Q6600, because if I were to buy Q6600 and a water cooling system, the net cost is equivalent to Q9450. I heart on Q6600, with Water cooling, achieving 3.6Ghz OC isn't much problem. I'm not sure how good Q9450 Overclocks though.
Which would be more of an efficient option for me?
I'm debating between Q9450 and Q6600, because if I were to buy Q6600 and a water cooling system, the net cost is equivalent to Q9450. I heart on Q6600, with Water cooling, achieving 3.6Ghz OC isn't much problem. I'm not sure how good Q9450 Overclocks though.
Which would be more of an efficient option for me?
Go with a Q6600 and pray you get a nice VID with WCing.
with a Q9450 youre guaranteed 3.3-3.6
with a Q9550 youre guaranteed 3.4-3.8
with a NEWER Q6600 youre guaranteed 3.0-3.2
with an older Q6 youre guaranteed 3.2-3.5
all of this considering you have a good aftermarket cooler (tuniq tower, xigmatek, TRUE, vendetta2)
It all really depends on the chip & motherboard.Each on will oc different,you just never know.But with the q9450 you'll need to run your fsb at 450 to achieve 3.6,because of the multi(8x).Where as with the q66 it has a multi of 9x.Either or will do IMO,but as of right now I think I would go with the newer chip.
Look at the proof in my SIG..It´s on Air..It´s an 24/7 Setting..Easily could be over 4.0 Ghz..But depend on other components in the Sistem too...
I stick with the 9450, or better for the same price the 9550!!
Heh, I've got my 1.3000 VID Q6600 up to 3.6. When are you going to OC yours?
I tried I got it to 9x @ 3.5 but one core fails after a few minutes of small tests on P95. I did try 8x to try and get a stable 3.6 but my temps kept going above 70°C so I stopped. The most stable clock was @ 3.4 with temps in the mid 60s so I was OK, but I wasn't interested in pushing it for that long just seeing what I am capable of. I got a horrible VID
Look at the proof in my SIG..It´s on Air..It´s an 24/7 Setting..Easily could be over 4.0 Ghz..But depend on other components in the Sistem too...
I stick with the 9450, or better for the same price the 9550!!
What's your temps and stuff @ idle and load with your clock, give this guy an idea
get the Q9550 for SURE.. it's only a few dollars more. and cheaper at some places if you get a deal... if you can get an E0 stepping then great. if not then oh well. I've seen almost everyon Q9550 get to 4.0 Ghz on Air.. they are amazing chips for sure.
I'd do that for sure!
my friend just got a Q6600 from TD and it was a 1.2750 VID. I was amazed! either way a Q9xxx is better.
I tried I got it to 9x @ 3.5 but one core fails after a few minutes of small tests on P95. I did try 8x to try and get a stable 3.6 but my temps kept going above 70°C so I stopped. The most stable clock was @ 3.4 with temps in the mid 60s so I was OK, but I wasn't interested in pushing it for that long just seeing what I am capable of. I got a horrible VID
The 1.3250 VID is the worst made for the Q6600 G0. But you should be able to run that 3.4 for 24x7 load. Mid 60s isn't bad. Probably even lower temps if you get a TRUE.
I'd go for the Q9450. It will probably clock higher than the newer Q6600 and has 12MB of cache. It's also 45nm and has SSE4.1 so is cooler and has a newer instruction base.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could
be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Overclock.net
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!