Quote:
Originally Posted by error10 
Bah, the chip doesn't fry at 71. That's just the point at where you start significantly losing lifespan.
|
Which will lead to?
When I say "fry" I dont necessarily mean that you'll hear crackling noises,smell BBQ and see/smell smoke.
But run your chip at 73*c for any extension of time and see what happens.
IT WILL FRY EVENTUALLY.
I've noticed much of this rhetoric HERE, and it surprises me frankly :|
Believe me, when you hear Intel list a temperature as being its max operating temperature...
THEY MEAN MAX. Its plain foolish to run a chip at those temps.
One's chip may give a year under such circumstances, when another might only live for 2 months. All chips are not created equal.
Intel has not had a firm reputation over the years for giving boxed cooling that aptly cools their chips. They've always been mediocre really.
Compared to the boxed sets that came out for AMD's 64bit chips. (THEY RAN COOL.)
So Intel's chips running into the "60s" at stock is no indicator of anything.
Intel cant account for what its users case ambients are, and I forward that with an adequetly cooled case, 59-60 is round about the top temps the chips will reach under load with stock coolers. NOT the "60s".
It WAS "designed" to withstand those temperatures sure.
But the word "withstanding" suggests enough.
Its a totally different matter from creating an environment that will see the chip having a LONG lifespan.
Close to that 10-12YEAR average lifespan that is accepted as SHOULD BE average for CPUs. Suffice to say, a chip that lives in a home where its average load temp during operating is 70*c SHALL NOT LIVE THAT LONG.
I wish folks here would start realizing how important the said is in the long run.
I say, keep your chip -60*c.