Joined
·
75 Posts
Hi guys! Here's my another review on Armaggeddon's gaming mouse - G11 
[REVIEW] Armaggeddon AlienCraft G11 Gaming Mouse
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
Joined
·
75 Posts
Quote:
For me, it's a bit mouthful to say XDOriginally Posted by trhead
"Armaggeddon AlienCraft"
LOL![biggrin.gif]()
Joined
·
75 Posts
Quote:
The sensor position will affect the mouse's performance?Originally Posted by trhead
Mouse looks nice and comfy but that sensor position is a deal breaker for me.
Joined
·
75 Posts
Quote:
Any recommendation for good fps gaming mouse?Originally Posted by MrFerrari
Looks like just another overspeced OEM mouse. It has a lot of features, but nothing that will make it good for fps.
Quote:
With this sensor position, flick RJ from left to right will feel different than right to left. Its hard to explain but any Quaker knows what I mean
![biggrin.gif]()
That is just one example why I don't like off centre sensor.
No but it makes some flick rocket jumps in Quake/TF2 unreliable.Originally Posted by Jeffrey1987
The sensor position will affect the mouse's performance?
With this sensor position, flick RJ from left to right will feel different than right to left. Its hard to explain but any Quaker knows what I mean
That is just one example why I don't like off centre sensor.
Quote:
Except super low max PCS on the sensor means a no-go for low sensers.Originally Posted by MrFerrari
Wheel Mouse Optical is a perfect example of what makes a great FPS mouse. Light & well balanced, precise,responsive, low LOD and a very "liftable" shape.
Quote:
I'm surprised. In order for me to have 400 CPI to move one pixel or less per report on FPS games I have to set my minimum sens to a number so low that the PCS becomes a problem. My normal sens is 70cm/360 though so yeah 1.5 m/s is absolutely unusable, but that's just in my case.Originally Posted by MrFerrari
I don't find the negative acceleration being that big of a deal. I don't notice it very much.
Quote:
I play with about 60cm/360 and does not have problems with it. Sure, I can notice it on fast swipes, but I mostly play CS:GO and focus a lot on crosshair placement. So it's very seldom that I have to swipe.Originally Posted by metal571
I'm surprised. In order for me to have 400 CPI to move one pixel or less per report on FPS games I have to set my minimum sens to a number so low that the PCS becomes a problem. My normal sens is 70cm/360 though so yeah 1.5 m/s is absolutely unusable, but that's just in my case.
Quote:
Yeah, that would be the one exception. My flicks are way, way too fast when playing BF4 Rush or old school COD games at 70cm/360.Originally Posted by MrFerrari
I play with about 60cm/360 and does not have problems with it. Sure, I can notice it on fast swipes, but I mostly play CS:GO and focus a lot on crosshair placement. So it's very seldom that I have to swipe.
Joined
·
633 Posts
Quote:
Why do you say DA2013 is worse? I had the FK, Savu, and Spawn (which all have the 3090 sensor) and the DA2013 beats them. I also don't know why people say they expierence "smoothing" with it because I can't (maybe its because I play on 400dpi).Originally Posted by metal571
Mionix Avior/Naos 7000.
SteelSeries Rival.
Corsair M45.
Any Zowie.
DA 2013 (distinctly a little worse than the 3310 and 3090 mice though)
Quote:
It's not really that, but there is more smoothing with the 2013 than the 3310, at least back when I tested it. Who knows, maybe some firmware helped improve it but the build quality and the materials they use for the main surface just doesn't make any sense to me. This board is also littered with stories of having to RMA that mouse...I myself had to RMA 4 3.5Gs back in the day. Yeah, no more Razer for me. Can't stand that company. The drivers are also...quite lame.Originally Posted by ronal
Why do you say DA2013 is worse? I had the FK, Savu, and Spawn (which all have the 3090 sensor) and the DA2013 beats them. I also don't know why people say they expierence "smoothing" with it because I can't (maybe its because I play on 400dpi).
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
Join the discussion
