Ya think?
Seriously the 'Ohh Ahh' effect as already run out for me, for both games.
Seriously the 'Ohh Ahh' effect as already run out for me, for both games.
[Shacknews]Blizzard: We Announce All Our Games Too Early
1 - 20 of 47 Posts
Quote:
Not me
![]()
Blizzard ALWAYS delivers an epic product. However, hopefully their ties with ACTIVISION don't make them the next InfinityFAIL.
Originally Posted by Madman340  Ya think? Seriously the 'Ohh Ahh' effect as already run out for me, for both games. |
Blizzard ALWAYS delivers an epic product. However, hopefully their ties with ACTIVISION don't make them the next InfinityFAIL.
2
Quote:
Who cares? Brb, going to go play Diablo 2.
Originally Posted by Nebel At least a year and a half left for Diablo III? Its visuals already look outdated, it's gonna look like crap in 2011. OFC Blizzard will release it when every average Joe can run the damn thing. |
Quote:
That's made made D2 and SC so damned successful. Every average joe could play the damn thing.
Originally Posted by Nebel At least a year and a half left for Diablo III? Its visuals already look outdated, it's gonna look like crap in 2011. OFC Blizzard will release it when every average Joe can run the damn thing. |
Quote:
Have you EVER played a game made by blizzard? Ever?
Graphics are the only lacking department (not at all, really, but I see your point), and that has never stopped nearly everything they touch from being the most beloved games of all time. With such widespread popularity and lengthy life of the games, why would they aim for the enthusiast market? Get over yourself and the 5970 you rode in on.
Originally Posted by Nebel At least a year and a half left for Diablo III? Its visuals already look outdated, it's gonna look like crap in 2011. OFC Blizzard will release it when every average Joe can run the damn thing. |
Graphics are the only lacking department (not at all, really, but I see your point), and that has never stopped nearly everything they touch from being the most beloved games of all time. With such widespread popularity and lengthy life of the games, why would they aim for the enthusiast market? Get over yourself and the 5970 you rode in on.
Quote:
Quoted for truth.
Originally Posted by liermam Have you EVER played a game made by blizzard? Ever? Graphics are the only lacking department (not at all, really, but I see your point), and that has never stopped nearly everything they touch from being the most beloved games of all time. With such widespread popularity and lengthy life of the games, why would they aim for the enthusiast market? Get over yourself and the 5970 you rode in on. |
Starcraft Ghost.
Quote:
I also agree.
I really despise elitist. After all, Gameplay > Graphics.
Quote:
Originally Posted by p0isonapple I love seeing how everyone defends the fact that Diablo II / WoW are successful because most people can run them. Well, then, what about the huge portion of gaming demographic that prefer visually enhanced games? We all know that Crysis was a bunch of crap for story and single player gaming, but how much hype rose due to it's graphical engine and visual effects? With GPU's and visuals heading the way they are it's time to admit that releasing a graphically updated and pleasing game is another big way to sell your game to customers, this is 2009, I mean, cmon! What do you think other games will look like in 2011? They're certainly going to make Diablo III look EXTREMELY outdated. Torchlight 2, anyone? PS. No, I'm not saying that people with older computers shouldn't be able to run the game, I'm saying there should most definitely be a high quality option worthy of current GPU power at the time or release. |
I also agree.
I really despise elitist. After all, Gameplay > Graphics.
Quote:
Please, don't get me wrong. I'm not trying to say that graphics is more important that gameplay in a game, because it's not in any way, what I'm trying to say is that in this day if you're looking to really open up both your game and audience and up to date and polished graphics engine is a serious requirement.
Originally Posted by pablo420 Starcraft Ghost. I also agree. I really despise elitist. After all, Gameplay > Graphics. |
Quote:
I understand that, but it is true what you are stating. Today's demands are polished graphics and great gameplay. I mean look at Crysis, it has great graphics, but at the same time, it lacks gameplay. I got bored after 10 minutes. I think that Game Developers should be looking at the mainstream instead of the Enthusiasts department.
Originally Posted by p0isonapple Please, don't get me wrong. I'm not trying to say that graphics is more important that gameplay in a game, because it's not in any way, what I'm trying to say is that in this day if you're looking to really open up both your game and audience and up to date and polished graphics engine is a serious requirement. |
Quote:
I don't doubt that it'll have meager visuals, but bear in mind that it's still a long way from being released. There's certainly plenty of time to refine visuals.
Originally Posted by Nebel At least a year and a half left for Diablo III? Its visuals already look outdated, it's gonna look like crap in 2011. OFC Blizzard will release it when every average Joe can run the damn thing. |
I don't think I can stress enough how infuriating I find this sort of thing. Blizzard`s strategy seems to be create YEARS of expectation for each of its games. I don't even know if I'll want to play it by 2011
![]()
.
BTW, was the game really so unfinished? back when the teaser came out, along with a gameplay video, it seemed things were well on their way, and that was a long time ago...
BTW, was the game really so unfinished? back when the teaser came out, along with a gameplay video, it seemed things were well on their way, and that was a long time ago...
1 - 20 of 47 Posts
