Overclock.net banner

[Shacknews] Mass Effect 2 System Requirements, DRM revealed

1851 Views 37 Replies 26 Participants Last post by  Jewels
http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/61383

Quote:


Minimum System Requirements

Processor: 1.8GHz Intel Core 2 Duo or equivalent AMD CPU
Memory: 1 GB RAM for Windows XP / 2 GB RAM for Windows Vista and Windows 7
Video Card: 256 MB (with Pixel Shader 3.0 support). Supported Chipsets: NVIDIA GeForce 6800 or greater; ATI Radeon X1600 Pro or greater. Please note that NVIDIA GeForce 7300, 8100, 8200, 8300, 8400, and 9300; ATI Radeon HD3200, and HD4350 are below minimum system requirements. Updates to your video and sound card drivers may be required. Intel and S3 video cards are not officially supported in Mass Effect 2.
Hard Drive: 15 GB
OS: Windows XP SP3 / Windows Vista SP1 / Windows 7
DVD ROM: 1x Speed
Sound Card: DirectX 9.0c compatible
DirectX: DirectX 9.0c August 2008 (included)
Input: Keyboard / Mouse

not bad.
1 - 20 of 38 Posts
15GB's but now it's actually worth it.
They're not bad at all considering the garbage specs companies have been throwing around in recent times.

Can't wait.
Ugh, I need a new CPU/GPU...
GPU is fine, but needs more vRAM to play at 1680x1050 with high textures. And CPU is getting outdated.

Still, requirements are pretty modest, I'd say.
2
Quote:


Originally Posted by venom55520
View Post

15GB's but now it's actually worth it.

I liked the first one a lot. Totally worth the $10 I paid
See less See more
can't wait until someone comes into the thread flipping out about DRM without reading the article

Quote:


"a basic disk check" without online authentication

Quote:


Originally Posted by OmegaNemesis28
View Post

can't wait until someone comes into the thread flipping out about DRM without reading the article

Honestly, I couldn't care less if it turned my desktop into a montage of gay porn. This is Mass Effect we're talking about!
See less See more
I kinda wish the requirements were a little higher. Then I would know that the graphics would be better than the first ones, even though the first ones were pretty good... 2 years ago.
Not bad really. 15GB is not too bad these days considering.
Quote:


Originally Posted by ENTERPRISE
View Post

Not bad really. 15GB is not too bad these days considering.

How are they going to get that on those tiny xbox disks?
See less See more
Well, if you can get 8+ on a standard DVD, and the XBox can read HD-DVDs, I think they have the space.
Quote:

Originally Posted by MrDeodorant View Post
Well, if you can get 8+ on a standard DVD, and the XBox can read HD-DVDs, I think they have the space.
you have to buy an attachment that's discontinued for hd-dvd's lol.

i assume some lower rez texture mixed with high compression and maybe 2 disks aught to do the job.
See less See more
2
Quote:

Originally Posted by ENTERPRISE View Post
Not bad really. 15GB is not too bad these days considering.
Considering the size of these two games at least. SW: The Force Unleashed = 24.6GB, AoC = 35.2GB
See less See more
Quote:


Originally Posted by MrDeodorant
View Post

Well, if you can get 8+ on a standard DVD, and the XBox can read HD-DVDs, I think they have the space.

8GB is on DL-DVDs, which is what all 360 games use.
They do not use HD-DVDs for any games at all. 360s can't read them You need a separate attachment to watch HD-DVD movies.
See less See more
Let's just hope the weapons and armor aren't Assault rifle 1-6, shotgun 1-6, heavy armor 1-6, light armor 1-6, etc again.
Quote:


Originally Posted by Nickosha
View Post

Let's just hope the weapons and armor aren't Assault rifle 1-6, shotgun 1-6, heavy armor 1-6, light armor 1-6, etc again.

Isn't that really how most video games, particularly RPGs, work?
Can't think of any other system other then just random weapons/armor.
See less See more
1 - 20 of 38 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top