Overclock.net banner

Short Stroke Results Correct?

720 Views 9 Replies 5 Participants Last post by  eflyguy
Hey
Ok i just reinstalled Windows and short stroked
I short stroked to 50gb per drive (100gb total)

Before short stroke


After Short Stroke


Do these results seem right?

Thnx btw
See less See more
2
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
These are not the result that you should've get, did you actually short stroke it or are you using both sides? The short (outer part) and the rest of the unformated partition?
Quote:


Originally Posted by Ecchi-BANZAII!!!
View Post

These are not the result that you should've get, did you actually short stroke it or are you using both sides? The short (outer part) and the rest of the unformated partition?

Well when i was setting up raid

It asked me to change parition size form 1000gb
and i chose 100gb (50gb per drive)

Windows also sees it as a 100gb drive

I thought i did it right since my access time dropped

So did i do it wrong?
See less See more
Quote:


Originally Posted by XX-Sunny-XX
View Post

Well when i was setting up raid

It asked me to change parition size form 1000gb
and i chose 100gb (50gb per drive)

Windows also sees it as a 100gb drive

I thought i did it right since my access time dropped

So did i do it wrong?

Technically you did right (I'm no pro at Short Stroking), but it may be the integrated RAID controller than doesn't delivers.
Since it's minimum speed is lower. but at least the max speed is higher.
See less See more
  • Rep+
Reactions: 1
Quote:


Originally Posted by Ecchi-BANZAII!!!
View Post

Technically you did right (I'm no pro at Short Stroking), but it may be the integrated RAID controller than doesn't delivers.
Since it's minimum speed is lower. but at least the max speed is higher.

Ahh okay thnx

Usually the minimum fluctuates quite alot tho

Also i changed my stripe size from 128k to 64k
See less See more
Yeah looks good. Since that's your OS drive you'll definitely get more of a boost out of the access times than the transfer rates. On regular hard disk drives the access times won't get too much lower, unless you get a couple of 10k RPM drives
Making the partions smaller isn't short stroking. Short stroking is when you actually reduce the hard drive's capacity. When you do this, you make only the outer ring of the platter usable, making the hard drive only have to seek on the outer ring. What you have done is just make a partion on the outer ring (Only if the 100gb is the primary) and the other 900gb of the hard drive is still usable. This means that the hard drive is still going to seek the other parts of the platter because all of the drive is usable.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Livinstrong View Post
Making the partions smaller isn't short stroking. Short stroking is when you actually reduce the hard drive's capacity. When you do this, you make only the outer ring of the platter usable, making the hard drive only have to seek on the outer ring. What you have done is just make a partion on the outer ring (Only if the 100gb is the primary) and the other 900gb of the hard drive is still usable. This means that the hard drive is still going to seek the other parts of the platter because all of the drive is usable.
Well what i did was

It asked me what size i wanted to set my raid array in the bios
i put 100gb

So i think i did it right
I can not see the 900gb in windows

Edit: Just checked under disk management and there is only the 100gb

I think i did it right
See less See more
You short-stroked correctly, as evidenced by the significant drop in access times.

Unfortunately, your controller is limiting your throughput, and having a major impact on CPU ultilization.
..a
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top