sure, if price is no object. i would upgrade space first though. You have a very nice rig with only 20gb of HD space....get a 1tb drive first, then a SSD. just my opinion.
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
2
Its fast, indeed, and small. Worth the price? Not so sure. If price isnt an option, what are you waiting for?
Get two of them and RAID0.. the speed you will see......... I wish I had cash
![]()
Quote:
depends on the cache of the seagate, but I would imagine that three of those drives in RAID 0 would be equal to two SSDs in same config.
Get two of them and RAID0.. the speed you will see......... I wish I had cash
Quote:
Originally Posted by kylej866  How much faster are SSDs compared to say... 250GB Seagate Barracuda? 7200RPM |
I heard on Vista that the SSD drives have a fair amount of issues, like super catch and defragmenting automatically......there was something else but cant remember off the top of my head.
But really, once you get the issues worked out I heard they are pretty dang fast
![]()
Edit: For my motherboards hardware raid0 I get around 135-145mb/s read speed(same HDD as yours).
But really, once you get the issues worked out I heard they are pretty dang fast
Edit: For my motherboards hardware raid0 I get around 135-145mb/s read speed(same HDD as yours).
Quote:
SSD > SCSI > Velociraptor > 7200 > 5400 > 4800 > horse dung.
Originally Posted by kylej866 Are they faster then Velociraptors HHDs? |
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
