Overclock.net banner

1 - 7 of 7 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
174 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Hey,

Simple question - In terms or Overall boot time and responsiveness , how much improvement in terms of % would I get if upgraded from Force 3 60GB to Samsung 840 - 120GB ?

Thanks in Advance.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
174 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokinWaffle View Post

Not much real world difference apart from space, the 840 has much slower sequential write speeds too (140MB/s vs almost 500MB/s for the Force) so it would be slower if anything.
Perfect answer that I was looking for!! Thanks again
biggrin.gif
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,159 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokinWaffle View Post

Not much real world difference apart from space, the 840 has much slower sequential write speeds too (140MB/s vs almost 500MB/s for the Force) so it would be slower if anything.
Hey sl4y3r,i dont know,maybe you wanted to hear that,but sorry SmokinWaffle is telling you wrong.Samsung can eat for breakfast Corsair Force 60GB and ask for more.
That 500mb/s that Corsair can do,its just in ATTO benchmark and like we all know ATTO benchmark is not real world benchmark,SO here you go:



O and i dont even want to talk about IOPS
 
  • Rep+
Reactions: sl4y3r

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
14,051 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unit Igor View Post

,its just in ATTO benchmark and like we all know ATTO benchmark is not real world benchmark
The same thing goes for AS SSD really, what about situations that utilize compressible data?

You won't find enough real-world difference in general usability to offset the cost.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,159 Posts
Yes you are right,what i want to say is that manufacturers use ATTO benchmark for advertising,because there is no sata3 SSD that cant hit 500 with ATTO. Why they dont use AS-SSD,AS-SSD dont deceive people with big numbers.You can be pretty sure,if you getting 500 in AS-SSD you are getting great SSD.
For ATTO there is no low performance SSD.
Also the best benchmark for SSD would be:"PCMark Vantage - Drives with Data Testing" ,but i cant find this two SSD on same review site.
 
  • Rep+
Reactions: sl4y3r

·
Registered
Joined
·
174 Posts
Discussion Starter #7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unit Igor View Post

Hey sl4y3r,i dont know,maybe you wanted to hear that,but sorry SmokinWaffle is telling you wrong.Samsung can eat for breakfast Corsair Force 60GB and ask for more.
That 500mb/s that Corsair can do,its just in ATTO benchmark and like we all know ATTO benchmark is not real world benchmark,SO here you go:



O and i dont even want to talk about IOPS
Thanks for your input.
smile.gif
Good to know the dirty tricks marketers play on us!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by beers View Post

The same thing goes for AS SSD really, what about situations that utilize compressible data?

You won't find enough real-world difference in general usability to offset the cost.
That's what I was looking for, and you Sir have told me that no real world benefits would be visible, so thank you for that!!
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
Top